Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/20/2003 9:45:33 AM PDT by freepatriot32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: freepatriot32; scripter
Here it is, the PROOF!

ACLU defends NAMBLA!

In addition, how come we didn't hear about THIS case in the news ad infinatum, like Matthew Shepard? It's because the newsmedia wants us to think gays are just like you and I, they're harmless really.

But we know, it's complete utter BS.
2 posted on 07/20/2003 9:51:45 AM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
go get 'em!

I first heard of NAMBLA more than 20 years ago from gay friends in LA -- they were digusted by it and trying to get other gays and straights they knew to oppose it in its infant stages. Almost everyone they talked to about it thought NAMBLA was just a joke, and gave my friends a bad time about being alarmists. Pity more people wouldn't listen.

3 posted on 07/20/2003 9:55:00 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
American Civil Liberties Union, which is defending NAMBLA in the lawsuit,
Your KIDDING!!(Sarcasm off)
Why am I not suprised. Where are they when people try and talk to the young ladies going into the abortion clinics? We can kill them before they see the light of day, we can rape and murder them, no wonder they are confused! If that's "The Village" that Hillary was speaking of then count me out.
4 posted on 07/20/2003 9:55:05 AM PDT by CCCV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
The perps of this crime are doing very hard time at MCI Cedar Junction (aka Walpole). A prison guard called into a talk show and said they are not having a good time there.
5 posted on 07/20/2003 10:00:19 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
ACLU.... so concerned about their invented separation of church and state
taking God out of the Pledge
incessant lobbying making school prayer illegal
The harrassing of kids who want to bring their bibles to school
defender of the sickest most vile sexual predators ...

What a great addition to our culture these atheist bass turds are...
6 posted on 07/20/2003 10:01:21 AM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Imagine the national furor if the headline read, "ACLU asks federal judge to dismiss case against man-girl sex group." We wouldn't tolerate the existance of such a group in this nation if it involved girls, and we should be equally as outraged that these monsters target young boys. It doesn't surprise me AT ALL that the ACLU is taking the lead in this.
7 posted on 07/20/2003 10:01:58 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Does anyone know what, if any, redeeming words there are in a lawyer's oath after passing the bar? Certainly, in so many words, its says" Do whatever it takes to get your client off", and I suspect, nowhere is there any reference to justice.
9 posted on 07/20/2003 10:04:36 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Barbara Curley stands next to photos of her son, Jeffrey Curley, at her home in Cambridge, Mass., in 1998. Jeffrey was kidnapped and killed in October 1997.
10 posted on 07/20/2003 10:05:14 AM PDT by freepatriot32 (Heaven is weary, of the hollow words Which States and Kingdoms utter when they talk of justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Braggadocio Bill O'Reilly has championed this case for several years now, with good cause. He'll address the movement in the case I'm sure.

My rather large gut has a BAD feeling about this case. If the case was being held in Arkansas, (site of another NAMBLA inspired vicious homosexual gang rape and murder on a pubescent male, Jesse Dirkheising), a saner verdict would be reached. In the land of the Kennedy, a decision against NAMBLA is a long shot.
11 posted on 07/20/2003 10:12:01 AM PDT by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
An ethical or moral wrong can always be measured by the ACLU's position on ANY given issue...

Shame on Bob Barr for ANY affiliation with this heinous so-called "liberties" advocacy group.

12 posted on 07/20/2003 10:12:36 AM PDT by F16Fighter (Ann Coulter for Attorney General... Joe Scarborough for VP...Tom Tancredo as Homeland Security Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Last year, the boy's parents, Barbara and Robert Curley, filed a $200 million wrongful death lawsuit against the North American Man/Boy Love Association, claiming Jaynes was incited by the group.

Here is my question: what is the difference between this lawsuit and the RICO lawsuit against the pro-life organization? Why did the ACLU not step forward and defend the pro-lifers? I think we know the reason why.

14 posted on 07/20/2003 10:23:21 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
The ACLU showing their true beliefs.

Also many of the "Libertarian Right" on FR, IMO, praise everything the ACLU does.

No surprise there.

15 posted on 07/20/2003 10:28:41 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Disgusted bump.
16 posted on 07/20/2003 10:30:21 AM PDT by FourPeas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Thanks for the post. The ACLU is truly disgusting...
17 posted on 07/20/2003 10:32:50 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
The ACLU thinks pedophilia is chic but works to stamp out God in America. Its their interpretation of the First Amendment that's twisted. If at least they were consistent in their defense of unpopular views they would have more credibility.
18 posted on 07/20/2003 10:37:53 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
The lawsuit alleges that Jaynes joined NAMBLA in the fall of 1996...

The suit does not allege that Sicari was a member of the group.

How can it allege both of these things? Most likely, the reporter is an idiot.

19 posted on 07/20/2003 10:45:35 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Now we know why the ACLU hates the Boy Scouts so much. The Scouts have standards for what is and what is not considered acceptable; and they are high standards that all are demanded to meet or they are either gone or cannot come in!
23 posted on 07/20/2003 11:19:05 AM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32; All
I truly believe that GLSEN is closely associated with this bunch of perverts, considering their zeal in spreading degeneracy in elementary schools! GLSEN should be investigated at the Federal level from top to bottom.
24 posted on 07/20/2003 11:28:53 AM PDT by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
Like the hapless and delusional Bob Barr, I once believed that ACLU was a necessary shield for Constitutional rights, even when this required unpopular stands.

I first came into conflict with the organization over their dogmatic policy of attacking relatively minor, and often personal, examples of religious symbolism. I was agnostic at the time, but I did not see that such things as a Nativity Scene or a Ten Commandments plaque represented a threat. Rather, they were symbols of our collective cultural heritage and their exclusion would represent a kind of censorship: the attempt to prohibit this kind of expression seemed to be the greater threat.

I realized that the ACLU's perception of a threat was based on a fundamental component of the left/liberal worldview: that every action and word associated with government and its employees should carry the weight of law. They were interpreting these displays in terms of what the displays would mean if THEY were running things.

This is true of the Pledge of Allegiance as well. "Under God" is officially "endorsed" according to ACLU and therefore carries the weight of authority by virtue of emanating from an official source. This is projection, nothing more. Liberals want this kind of authority to apply to their own pronouncements, and assume that it does, so they must project it onto the actions of others. Remember this when you hear about LL indoctrination in, say, multi-culturalism or Kennedy/Roosevelt hagiography.

30 posted on 07/20/2003 12:03:57 PM PDT by atomic conspiracy ( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: freepatriot32
INTREP
31 posted on 07/20/2003 12:10:03 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson