Pedophiles Seek Online Support, Societal Acceptance

CNSNews.com ^ | 6/13/03 | Steve Brown

[GrandMoM]

....let's see how many FR posters that defend homosexuals, and dispute any connection to the vile NAMBLA or BUTTERFLY KISSES surface and PROCLAIM THEIR OPPOSITION and REPULSION for pedophiles who seek support and acceptance for their fixation on children. ....I'm WAITING!

GEE!.... more than Five minutes later and still no familar voices from the gay is good crowd! Gee, the voice of silence is deafening!

[GrandMoM]

BUMP see post #35!

[Jeff Gordon]

....I'm WAITING!

Whatever floats your boat.

[LanPB01]

Are you still waiting? Still haning on? You must really be obsessed with homos, lady. Here's my message - you're an idiot. Homosexual pedophiles, as well as hetero, should be taken out and shot. Equating all the homos with pedophilia is just stupid. It's as stupid as equating pedophilia with Catholicism.

[scripter]

As I see it, to stay true to the gay agenda, gays and gay proponents will appear to distance themselves from groups that may hurt their cause. As documented in After the Ball, How America will Conquer its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90s by Kirk and Madsen, they write on page 182:

Because our movement must first grow stronger before it can help its still weaker friends, we recommend a rule for public alliance that is tough and selfish. But that rule doesn't favor insularity: the movement should eagerly ally itself with large , mainstream groups that can actually advance our interests (e.g., the Democratic P arty, the National Organization for Women, or the Presbyterian Church). But even then, we should demand to see some major public demonstration of their commitment to our cause before we rush to commit to theirs.

Unless and until such bold alliances materialize, however, the bottom line remains: be focused in your efforts to reach the public via mass media. In the minds of straights, we must be gay people, not leftists or whales. So talk, talk, talk about gay rights, and leave it at that. (Feel free to agitate for any other cause you like, of course, but do so while wearing another hat.) And downplay any support from outgroups whose very names are likely to arouse suspicion and antipathy. Otherwise, desensitization will be all the harder to achieve.

[maxwell]

Are, or are not, homosexuals over-represented in the pedophile set?

[LanPB01]

I don't know if they are or not. For every study I see claiming they are, I see a couple saying they aren't. Regardless, it's lazy thinking to lump all homos together due to the fact that some of them are pedophiles.

[GrandMoM]

And downplay any support from outgroups whose very names are likely to arouse suspicion and antipathy. Otherwise, desensitization will be all the harder to achieve. ....and that is quite obvious what the pro gay posters here on FR are doing, isn't it!

Here is their chance to rise up to the occasion and prove to us they weren't lying!

Let's here some oppositon to these child raping animals from the pro gay poster!!!

[GrandMoM]

Are you still waiting? Still haning on? You must really be obsessed with homos, lady. Here's my message - you're an idiot. Homosexual pedophiles, as well as hetero, should be taken out and shot.....am I? Most pro-gay posters voiced no interest in NAMBLA, BUTTERFLY KISSES, but funny thing is, they never show up on these threads to voice their repulsion!

Equating all the homos with pedophilia is just stupid. It's as stupid as equating pedophilia with Catholicism. ....you want to show me where I equated all homos with pedophilia? All I want is to really hear them denounce the child loving crowd as they proclaim they do! Here is their chance!

....Oh and....BACK OFF BOZO!

[Antoninus]

I don't know if they are or not. For every study I see claiming they are, I see a couple saying they aren't. Regardless, it's lazy thinking to lump all homos together due to the fact that some of them are pedophiles.

Since you brought up the Catholic Church, I don't suppose you could explain how a full 90% of the sex abuse incidents in the Catholic Church involved men on boys.

A bitter harvest of omnisexual freaks is the whirlwind we are reaping from sowing the sexual wind in the 1960s and 1970s. That said, if anyone ever touches my kids, they won't make it to trial.

[GrandMoM]

Whatever floats your boat. ....so when are you graduating from pre-school?????

[LanPB01]

"I don't suppose you could explain how a full 90% of the sex abuse incidents in the Catholic Church involved men on boys."

No, I can't. I don't think it's particularly relevant, either. I'm not about to blame Catholicism for the sex abuse, nor am I about to blame homosexuality. I blame pedophiles.

[LanPB01]

These "pro-gay" posters you're referring to (and I'm certainly not aware of any "pro-gay" group; maybe a group that doesn't care about homos, maybe) probably don't show up to discuss a thread about pedophiles because they don't have a reason to. They don't automatically equate homos with pedophilia, as you apparently do.

[scripter]

It never fails. Conservatives warned years ago about normalizing homosexuality, as normalizing something based on a behavior (and a sexual behavior at that), is just plain ignorant. For those who don't get it, think about it.

Yet if society continues to normalize behaviors we will eventually come to a point when pedophiles, based on their behaviour, want the behavior normalized. Well, we've reached that point. So when conservatives point this out, gays and gay proponents miss the point entirely and argue a straw man argument. That being, most homosexuals are not pedophiles.

That's not the argument. Conservatives have always warned that normalizing something based on behavior is wrong. Now that we've reached that point, those who disagree can only argue against a straw man.

[Gargantua]

Demanding public acceptance of queers is just the first step in de-sensitizing society to all of these other abhorrent, morally depraved and anti-social perversions.

But, it ain't worth getting all het-up over. The fags have won. We're too far over the edge of that slippery slope to change anything now. Enjoy.

;-/

[jhw61]

Well some of us do have reason to discuss pedophiles. Do you have children, grandchildren? Couple of comments regarding you profile...
forcing a woman to carry a child....o'h yes, so terrible...nine months out of your whole life. Maybe if they gave it a try, they'd see how great the experience was. BTW, Women who become pregnant from rape make up a very small percentage and I don't necessarily believe that being raped and becoming pregnant from the horror = automatic abortion.

You're a twinkie in the world.

[LanPB01]

Then go talk about the pedophiles. This thread should actually BE about pedophiles, but oddly enough, every thread that relates to sex on FreeRepublic ends up with some social conservative screaming how every fault in society is somehow the blame of the queers. And save your analysis of profiles for someone that gives a damn, cause I don't.

[Qwerty]

"....let's see how many FR posters that defend homosexuals, and dispute any connection to the vile NAMBLA or BUTTERFLY KISSES surface and PROCLAIM THEIR OPPOSITION and REPULSION for pedophiles who seek support and acceptance for their fixation on children."

I defend homosexuals, dispute connection to Nambla or Butterfly Kisses, and proclaim opposition and repulsion for pedophiles who seek acceptance for their fixation on children.

So?

[Qwerty]

"Let's here some oppositon to these child raping animals from the pro gay poster!!!"

When have you ever seen ANY Freeper support pedophilia? For that matter, have you ever heard anyone anywhere support it?

[GrandMoM]

LanPBo1 Since Jan 30, 2003

....you might want refrain from making SHORTSIGHTED remarks like this; I'm certainly not aware of any "pro-gay" until your here for a while NEWBIE!