Click on URL for the sources.
I needed to post this since amazingly, some people even here are actually defending the ban.
To: *bang_list
Bang!
2 posted on
04/16/2003 9:33:55 PM PDT by
Atlas Sneezed
("Democracy, whiskey! And sexy!")
Bump to read later
3 posted on
04/16/2003 9:42:06 PM PDT by
Drew68
To: Dan from Michigan
People should be able to "keep and bear" the same arms our "authorities" use against us, including those automatic weapons we saw used in the Elian Gonzales kidnaping and the tank cannon used against Mt. Carmel in Waco.
To: Dan from Michigan
The prohibition is no more rational than a prohibition on beer based on legislative "findings" that beer grows on trees, that a single sip always causes instant physical addiction,
And yet when a libertarian makes the same statement about marijuana,
a hefty portion of the gun crowd gets 'up in arms.' The refusal to
recognize that gungrabbers and drugwarriors are two sides of one antiliberty
coin leads to a split in what should be solid support for the freedom of both.
6 posted on
04/16/2003 9:57:30 PM PDT by
gcruse
(The F word, N word, C word: We're well on our way to spelling 'France.')
To: Dan from Michigan
A folding stock makes a gun shorter and easier to carry, thus making it useful to hunters. Non-NFA firearms with folding stocks (as distinct from folding actions) are a fair bit larger than smallish rifles/shotguns without them. To avoid NFA classification, a firearm with a folding stock must have a minimum collapsed length of 26"; since the sights, grip, and trigger are usually located for maximum utility with the stock unfolded (which, to be meaningful, must add at least 6" to the gun) this means such firearms generally have a useful length of 32" or more. While a rifle that's e.g. 34" collapsable to 26" has some advantages over one that's simply 26" long, concealability is hardly one of them.
7 posted on
04/16/2003 10:08:36 PM PDT by
supercat
(TAG--you're it!)
To: Dan from Michigan
bflr
8 posted on
04/16/2003 10:15:27 PM PDT by
Drammach
To: Dan from Michigan
Because of an injury to her wrist, she was unable to use a handgun. WAIT Wait wait -
- she *only* had one arm too?
11 posted on
04/16/2003 10:23:00 PM PDT by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: Dan from Michigan
30-round ammunition magazineA 30-round clip?
THAT is a little excessive for defense of property in a city (unless, of course, you're protecting your storefront property somewhere in LA during a riot) ...
12 posted on
04/16/2003 10:25:38 PM PDT by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: Dan from Michigan
Baaaaad article. Quite literally falls apart in several places in the last several paragraphs IMNSHO ...
14 posted on
04/16/2003 10:31:55 PM PDT by
_Jim
( // NASA has a better safety record than NASCAR \\)
To: Dan from Michigan
34 posted on
04/16/2003 10:44:31 PM PDT by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Dan from Michigan
I needed to post this since amazingly, some people even here are actually defending the ban.
-DfM-
Far more than 'some'. I would estimate that we may be nearing the 50/50 mark at FR.
The governments position on such prohibitive 'regulating' of the RKBA's is virtually unapposed by the GOP or the current administration, and those who support them here.
Ashcroft's giving lip service to an 'individual right', as if there were any question on the matter, means nothing. The right will be 'regulated' into meaningless rhetoric, -- slowly..
46 posted on
04/16/2003 11:00:04 PM PDT by
tpaine
To: Dan from Michigan
This isn't an assault weapon, it's my homeland defense rifle.
47 posted on
04/16/2003 11:00:52 PM PDT by
2nd_Amendment_Defender
("It is when people forget God that tyrants forge their chains." -- Patrick Henry)
To: Dan from Michigan
Dan, great post. Thanks.
50 posted on
04/16/2003 11:05:50 PM PDT by
Badray
(I won't be treated like a criminal until after they catch me and convict me.)
To: Dan from Michigan
A visual aid:
To: Dan from Michigan
BTTT
62 posted on
04/17/2003 7:10:56 AM PDT by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: Dan from Michigan
M-60 Machine Gun = Assault weapon
M249 SAW (Squad Automatic Weapon) = Assault weapon
M-16 = Personal Rifle
Unless you are a member of the uniformed armed services, you should not be allowed to have possesion of the top 2. They are not precision weapons but weapons used to kill by utilizing overwhelming fire. That is why we have armies.
Any citizen of the United States should be allowed to own the bottom weapon (subject to some common sense restrictions, convicted violent felons, etc...). It is a precision weapon, even with full auto capabilities available.
Just my personal opinion.
66 posted on
04/17/2003 7:49:15 AM PDT by
Bryan24
To: Dan from Michigan
.
Don't be too sure that Bush will extend the assault gun ban. All this is spin. It is being treated as if it is a foregone conclusion. I think that everyone here might be pleasantly surprised... |
.
73 posted on
04/17/2003 1:41:43 PM PDT by
vannrox
(The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
To: Dan from Michigan
Thanks Dan, good job, as usual!
83 posted on
04/19/2003 5:17:57 PM PDT by
gc4nra
To: Dan from Michigan
BTTT
89 posted on
04/19/2003 8:27:09 PM PDT by
Gritty
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson