Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2003 8:11:17 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ElkGroveDan; ...
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register




2 posted on 01/11/2003 8:12:03 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Gov. Davis increased the size of government 40 percent in his first term," said Ron Hayes of Calabasas, sipping a cup of coffee at The Commons in Calabasas. "I think we need a top-to-bottom review of state government to cut any wasteful programs and expenditures. Higher sales taxes will just make it worse because it will only result in lower revenue to the state."

Give this guy a gold star! He has to be a Freeper.

4 posted on 01/11/2003 8:19:18 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Leave it up to the LA Slimes and the SF Gayrhonicle to go out and interview the left wing maggots that infect their areas about increasing sales taxes or any tax.

Of course these socialist maggots have no problem with any new tax/fee or any tax/fee increases as long as they get their share of our tax/fees to live their dark side life styles.
5 posted on 01/11/2003 8:21:20 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Support Free Republic. Become a monthly donor !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
if it's going to help with the deficit

I was an Econ major in the early '80's, when "trickle down" Economics was being debated. I have YET to hear the Laffer Curve mentioned in ANY debate about tax cuts other than in an Econ class. It is a standard bell curve, with Gov revinues on the left bar, and tax rates on the bottom bar. There is no Economist that denys the accuracy of the Laffer curve, there is only debate as to how far to the right the curent tax rates are. The Kenedy (John F; after his death) and the Reagan tax cuts PROVED that we were on the wrong side of the curve. Yet, even on "right wing" talk radio, Mr Laffer is never mentioned. Rush may talk about the Reagan tax cuts doubling Fed revinue, but doesn't elaborate.

Let's put it this way. If your tax rate was 100%, would you go to work every day? Heck no you wouldn't! What would be the point?

The problem is that this is never explained to the masses, so they think that the only way to eleminate a deficit it to RAISE taxes, when the exact opposite it true! Lower taxes and you will GROW YOUR WAY OUT of the deficit; IF you control government spending!

MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/

7 posted on 01/11/2003 8:27:38 AM PST by logic101.net
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
the 30-year-old stay-at-home mother from Pacoima said she isn't too bothered by the prospect of paying 9.25 percent in sales tax to help bring revenue to California's beleaguered budget.

"It's pretty steep, but if it's going to help with the deficit, I don't think it's going to push us off a cliff," she said Friday while shopping at the Panorama City Wal-Mart.

Several people interviewed Friday in the San Fernando Valley said they were willing to swallow the bitter pill of higher taxes to maintain spending for schools, police, roads and other purposes

Roya Hashemi of Tarzana said she'd pay more for cigarettes if the money is earmarked toward education and other worthy programs.

"It's not good, but I support it," she said. "It's not going to break my back."

"I don't mind paying the higher taxes, but I don't know what they're going to do with that extra penny (of sales tax)."

Jon Yenney, a middle-school teacher from Northridge, said he would rather the state increase sales taxes than cut money from the education budget.

"As far as sales taxes, I don't see that as that big of a deal," he said. "I think education is one area the governor shouldn't be messing around with."

Unbelievable. The government needs the money, so I don't mind paying higher taxes. I like the quote about education being one area the governor shouldn't be messing around with, but I don't think the speaker meant it the way I think it could be interpreted.

8 posted on 01/11/2003 8:27:42 AM PST by .38sw (how humiliatin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Public unfazed by hikes

That's not surprising since most of them are mind-numbed robots anyway.

9 posted on 01/11/2003 8:29:04 AM PST by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
a bump for atzlan
10 posted on 01/11/2003 8:30:26 AM PST by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is such a L I E!

At my work (all liberals) and here at freep, it's ALL us Californians are thinking about!

Talk about a bald-faced LIE!

Spin control, that's what this is. Pure spin!
11 posted on 01/11/2003 8:37:50 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Unfazed? The problem is, that unless there is more vocal opposition to the tax hikes, they will pass. Some Republican will cave.

I plan to send the SHIRT OFF MY BACK to Davis.

12 posted on 01/11/2003 8:39:44 AM PST by Drango (don't need no stinkin' tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hmmm....this will increase internet sales, then Davis will want to tax the internet......
?

14 posted on 01/11/2003 8:54:30 AM PST by gortklattu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
California: Public unfazed by hikes (Budget Crisis )

That's because much to the dismay of Califronia/ns haters and self-loathing Californians most of us can afford it...If you can't, move to Oregon or Washington...try finding a job there.

17 posted on 01/11/2003 8:59:44 AM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Indeed, the people of California deserve the governor they got! "The 1% sales tax increase will not push me over the cliff" says one resident. This zoombie reminds me of another, who lived in a house 5 meters from the edge of a cliff over looking the Pacific ocean. I asked this resident if he was worried about his house sliding into the sea. I'm not on the edge it's 5 meters away, besides the view is fantastic. Well, 5 years later his house floated away. Most Californians live for today, tomorrow is another day.
19 posted on 01/11/2003 9:21:45 AM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Francisco Esparza, a construction worker from Sylmar, said that while his income is limited, he'd rather pay more in taxes than witness a decline in services, especially police. Esparza said he travels regularly to Tecate, Mexico, to visit his 5-month-old son and immediately notices the higher quality of services and infrastructure in the United States.

Yeah, he doesn't mind the higher taxes and likes our infrastructure better than Mexico's....He's probably one of the bottom 50% that's paying almost nothing in taxes, but is sucking up a lot of social services. Glad you like the amenities that other people are paying for, buddy.

22 posted on 01/11/2003 10:16:38 AM PST by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's pretty steep, but if it's going to help with the deficit, I don't think it's going to push us off a cliff," she said Friday while shopping at the Panorama City Wal-Mart.

LOFL, you can always count on the LA Times to not only slobber with glee over tax hikes, but to kick over rocks until they find a few idiots like "Katrina Darrett" who don't mind helping government out of its deficit problems.
This article is a classic, hahahahaaaa...

24 posted on 01/11/2003 10:51:39 AM PST by Lancey Howard (Tag line (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I read in another article where a dozen Califronia lawmakers requested and reciever SUV's valued at about $30,000 each!, and at tax payer expense no less. And people wonder why the state is in a deficet situation. If the state lawmakers and legislateurs took a pay cut and didn't spenk tax payers money on frivolous items the deficent wouldn't be as great.
26 posted on 01/11/2003 11:05:24 AM PST by flynhghr (Do not read this tag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don't think it's going to push us off a cliff

Spoken like a true Californian Lemming.

31 posted on 01/11/2003 3:27:37 PM PST by pke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
California: Public unfazed

I believe the correct term is STUPOR

37 posted on 01/12/2003 10:31:45 AM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hence the term "sheeple".
38 posted on 01/12/2003 12:50:46 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson