To: *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ElkGroveDan; ...
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Gov. Davis increased the size of government 40 percent in his first term," said Ron Hayes of Calabasas, sipping a cup of coffee at The Commons in Calabasas. "I think we need a top-to-bottom review of state government to cut any wasteful programs and expenditures. Higher sales taxes will just make it worse because it will only result in lower revenue to the state." Give this guy a gold star! He has to be a Freeper.
4 posted on
01/11/2003 8:19:18 AM PST by
randita
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Leave it up to the LA Slimes and the SF Gayrhonicle to go out and interview the left wing maggots that infect their areas about increasing sales taxes or any tax.
Of course these socialist maggots have no problem with any new tax/fee or any tax/fee increases as long as they get their share of our tax/fees to live their dark side life styles.
5 posted on
01/11/2003 8:21:20 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Support Free Republic. Become a monthly donor !)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
if it's going to help with the deficit I was an Econ major in the early '80's, when "trickle down" Economics was being debated. I have YET to hear the Laffer Curve mentioned in ANY debate about tax cuts other than in an Econ class. It is a standard bell curve, with Gov revinues on the left bar, and tax rates on the bottom bar. There is no Economist that denys the accuracy of the Laffer curve, there is only debate as to how far to the right the curent tax rates are. The Kenedy (John F; after his death) and the Reagan tax cuts PROVED that we were on the wrong side of the curve. Yet, even on "right wing" talk radio, Mr Laffer is never mentioned. Rush may talk about the Reagan tax cuts doubling Fed revinue, but doesn't elaborate.
Let's put it this way. If your tax rate was 100%, would you go to work every day? Heck no you wouldn't! What would be the point?
The problem is that this is never explained to the masses, so they think that the only way to eleminate a deficit it to RAISE taxes, when the exact opposite it true! Lower taxes and you will GROW YOUR WAY OUT of the deficit; IF you control government spending!
MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
the 30-year-old stay-at-home mother from Pacoima said she isn't too bothered by the prospect of paying 9.25 percent in sales tax to help bring revenue to California's beleaguered budget. "It's pretty steep, but if it's going to help with the deficit, I don't think it's going to push us off a cliff," she said Friday while shopping at the Panorama City Wal-Mart.
Several people interviewed Friday in the San Fernando Valley said they were willing to swallow the bitter pill of higher taxes to maintain spending for schools, police, roads and other purposes
Roya Hashemi of Tarzana said she'd pay more for cigarettes if the money is earmarked toward education and other worthy programs.
"It's not good, but I support it," she said. "It's not going to break my back."
"I don't mind paying the higher taxes, but I don't know what they're going to do with that extra penny (of sales tax)."
Jon Yenney, a middle-school teacher from Northridge, said he would rather the state increase sales taxes than cut money from the education budget.
"As far as sales taxes, I don't see that as that big of a deal," he said. "I think education is one area the governor shouldn't be messing around with."
Unbelievable. The government needs the money, so I don't mind paying higher taxes. I like the quote about education being one area the governor shouldn't be messing around with, but I don't think the speaker meant it the way I think it could be interpreted.
8 posted on
01/11/2003 8:27:42 AM PST by
.38sw
(how humiliatin')
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Public unfazed by hikes
That's not surprising since most of them are mind-numbed robots anyway.
9 posted on
01/11/2003 8:29:04 AM PST by
mass55th
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
a bump for atzlan
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is such a L I E!
At my work (all liberals) and here at freep, it's ALL us Californians are thinking about!
Talk about a bald-faced LIE!
Spin control, that's what this is. Pure spin!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Unfazed? The problem is, that unless there is more vocal opposition to the tax hikes, they will pass. Some Republican will cave.
I plan to send the SHIRT OFF MY BACK to Davis.
12 posted on
01/11/2003 8:39:44 AM PST by
Drango
(don't need no stinkin' tag line)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hmmm....this will increase internet sales, then Davis will want to tax the internet......
?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
California: Public unfazed by hikes (Budget Crisis ) That's because much to the dismay of Califronia/ns haters and self-loathing Californians most of us can afford it...If you can't, move to Oregon or Washington...try finding a job there.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Indeed, the people of California deserve the governor they got! "The 1% sales tax increase will not push me over the cliff" says one resident. This zoombie reminds me of another, who lived in a house 5 meters from the edge of a cliff over looking the Pacific ocean. I asked this resident if he was worried about his house sliding into the sea. I'm not on the edge it's 5 meters away, besides the view is fantastic. Well, 5 years later his house floated away. Most Californians live for today, tomorrow is another day.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Francisco Esparza, a construction worker from Sylmar, said that while his income is limited, he'd rather pay more in taxes than witness a decline in services, especially police. Esparza said he travels regularly to Tecate, Mexico, to visit his 5-month-old son and immediately notices the higher quality of services and infrastructure in the United States.Yeah, he doesn't mind the higher taxes and likes our infrastructure better than Mexico's....He's probably one of the bottom 50% that's paying almost nothing in taxes, but is sucking up a lot of social services. Glad you like the amenities that other people are paying for, buddy.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's pretty steep, but if it's going to help with the deficit, I don't think it's going to push us off a cliff," she said Friday while shopping at the Panorama City Wal-Mart.LOFL, you can always count on the LA Times to not only slobber with glee over tax hikes, but to kick over rocks until they find a few idiots like "Katrina Darrett" who don't mind helping government out of its deficit problems.
This article is a classic, hahahahaaaa...
24 posted on
01/11/2003 10:51:39 AM PST by
Lancey Howard
(Tag line (optional, printed after your name on post):)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I read in another article where a dozen Califronia lawmakers requested and reciever SUV's valued at about $30,000 each!, and at tax payer expense no less. And people wonder why the state is in a deficet situation. If the state lawmakers and legislateurs took a pay cut and didn't spenk tax payers money on frivolous items the deficent wouldn't be as great.
26 posted on
01/11/2003 11:05:24 AM PST by
flynhghr
(Do not read this tag!)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I don't think it's going to push us off a cliff Spoken like a true Californian Lemming.
31 posted on
01/11/2003 3:27:37 PM PST by
pke
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
California: Public unfazedI believe the correct term is STUPOR
37 posted on
01/12/2003 10:31:45 AM PST by
paul51
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Hence the term "sheeple".
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson