Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New book on parenting engenders anger in gays
www.northjersey.com ^ | 12/13/02 | Ruth Padawar

Posted on 12/14/2002 1:12:14 PM PST by I_Love_My_Husband

New book on parenting engenders anger in gays

RUTH PADAWER

Move over, Dr. Spock. Now, alongside parenting books on discipline, potty training, and sibling rivalry, there's this: "A Parent's Guide to Preventing Homosexuality."

In a message that has some people getting riled and others throwing out the welcome mat, authors Joseph and Linda Ames Nicolosi argue that homosexuality is a "disorder" that parents can head off. To do that, they say parents should toughen up "girlish" boys, feminize rough-and-tumble girls, and make sure their kids stick with toys, activities, and mannerisms traditionally aligned with their gender.

It's a controversial prescription - sure to get the daytime TV talk shows buzzing.

"He uses the ugliest of stereotypes, with a 'science' that is provably bankrupt," Wayne Besen, spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay and lesbian political group, says of Joseph Nicolosi. "His underlying message is that people can't find peace and happiness in being gay. It's complete nonsense."

But Len Deo, head of the New Jersey Family Policy Council, applauds the Nicolosis' message.

"Man was created to be in a complementary union with a woman - that's the natural order," he said. "No matter how you slice it, homosexuality is a tough lifestyle, and for parents, it's becoming more and more important to direct their children toward a normal, healthy lifestyle."

Joseph Nicolosi is no stranger to controversy. As founder and president of the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality, he has long argued that homosexuality is a disability that can be repaired.

In the new book, Nicolosi and his wife urge parents to intervene as soon as they spot trouble: a boy playing with dolls; a girl romping only with boys. They tell fathers to be close to their sons, showing them how to fill gas tanks and partake in sports, and they warn that if fathers don't hug their sons, someday another man will.

Mothers, they say, must avoid over-involvement in their boys' lives. Children should find playmates of the same gender, so girls who might tend toward lesbianism can learn feminine ways, and what he calls "pre-homosexual boys" can be toughened up by other boys' roughness.

Mainstream psychologists and gay rights advocates are not the only ones rankled by the Nicolosis' advice.

"His ideas sound like they're from the 1950s," said John Chapman, a Teaneck father of two girls, ages 15 and 19. "I was brought up with those ideas, and I can't imagine imposing them on my kids. Giving girls dolls or making boys play baseball won't make them heterosexual, though it may make them miserable and repress who they really are. We raised our children to know we would love them no matter what."

The bottom line is that no one is born gay, Joseph Nicolosi said in an interview, and the proper environment can help children "actualize their true heterosexual nature." He contends that boys become gay because they feel insecure in their masculinity, and girls become lesbians to make up for the lack of connection with their mothers.

They are ideas that the medical establishment rejected years ago. The American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Medical Association all concluded about 30 years ago that homosexuality is not a disorder. More recently, they note that several studies indicate at least some biological basis for sexual orientation.

"His ideas about homosexuality are a recitation of old psychoanalytic theories that never had any empirical support to begin with," said Douglas Haldeman, co-author of the American Psychological Association's guidelines for psychotherapy for lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Haldeman says his colleagues have been firing off e-mails raging about the book. "His ideas are totally out of step with the social sciences. The notion that we should interfere with atypical gender behavior - especially based on prejudicial and outmoded ideas of gender identity - is potentially very dangerous for kids."

The Nicolosis suggest that parents replace toys, games, and articles of clothing that are not specific to their child's gender. They stress the importance of "extinguishing feminine behavior" in boys with "gentle and consistent disapproval." And they say parents should also watch out for tomboys.

"In and of itself, a girl who wants to wear blue jeans and climb trees is not a cause of concern," said Nicolosi. "But the pre-lesbian condition includes stereotypic rejection of femininity, only wearing things that look like a boy's, being emotionally detached from the mother, wanting to play only with boys."

Gay rights supporters have dismissed the book as simply the latest salvo in the ongoing, rancorous debate over homosexuality.

"They used to try to save society from gay people, like in the late 1980s saying that gays should be quarantined if they had AIDS," said Besen. "Then in the Nineties, there were people like Fred Phelps, the minister of God Hates Fags, with the idea that fire and brimstone and condemnation was the answer. And now their line is: 'We love gay people. We're simply trying to save them from themselves.' It's the same message, just in a prettier package."

Of course, not everyone agrees. The book carries a long list of endorsements from leaders in the traditional family values movement, who welcome it as a refreshing addition to a world they view as both too prescriptive and too lenient. The well-known radio evangelist James Dobson has called the book the "very best resource for parents and teachers."

"In our culture, boys can't be boys anymore," said Frances Edwards, a Ridgewood mother of children aged 10, 9, and 4. "Traditional boyish pranks are now viewed as psychosis or a crime. They're put on Ritalin and told they have to behave a certain way. There's a lot of pressure in our society to feminize boys and of course that's going to have an impact on a certain percentage of them."

Jim Slagter, a Wayne father of an 18-year-old boy and 15-year-old daughter, has always been amused at the ways his kids entertained themselves during car rides - his son making car and gun noises, his daughter singing and talking to her dolls.

"I agree with efforts not to encourage anything that might lead to homosexual behavior, primarily because I believe it would not be a happy life," Slagter said. "My wife and I have always tried to be conscious not to smother our son with too much protection. We have tried to find a balance. We wanted him to grow up to be tough enough to be a ... well, to be a man."

Little of the political debate resonates with parents who have come to accept their children's homosexuality. Though they agree with Nicolosi's assertion that lesbians and gays are sometimes distraught over their orientation, they say it's only because they fear a hostile reception.

"My daughter would have been very happy at one point not to be gay," said Lillian Epstein, a Park Ridge mother whose children are now grown. "Going through high school, college, her first years as a lawyer, those were difficult years. She was terrified of being found out, of being fired. She had to live a life of lies. When she came out to us, 25 years ago, I wondered, like every parent does: What did I do wrong? Did I send her to the wrong college? Was it too liberal?

"In the beginning, when you learn your child is gay, you think you should bring your child to therapy so they can change. But parents have to realize that it's their own expectations that have to change. Eventually, you move beyond accepting, to the point where you cherish their uniqueness and admire their courage."


TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gays; homosexualagenda; michaeldobbs; prisoners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last
To: On the Road to Serfdom
BTTT
81 posted on 12/15/2002 9:04:03 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
I don't pretend to understand what causes homosexuality, nor do I pretend to understand what would prevent it. I do know that there was a time when it did not matter so much. When it was kept private, to be shared with only those they chose to share it with, they were treated much like heterosexual couples. No one ever talked about their sex life, because it was a very personal and private subject.

If they were born with this homosexuality, like people are born with blue eyes or brown eyes, and if there was nothing they could do to change their behavior, like they want us to believe, why are they so intent on "converting" our young peopl?. Why do they want to teach homosexuality in the schools? If it were normal or natural, all of their efforts would be in vain.

I could care less if someone wants to indulge in that lifestyle as long as they do it in the privacy of their homes, and do not try and convert me or my children.

Using the public school systems to teach that this is "normal" behavior, that homosexuals can't change how they feel, and encourage young people to engage in this behavior without giving them the facts about how risky this lifestyle is is not acceptable.

IF they kept their behavior private, there would not be any discrimination against them because no one would know.

82 posted on 12/15/2002 10:13:07 AM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
My wife provides an excellent and ongoing treatment for such a malady, and she states I'm a good treatment for her as well. Sign me, still playing doctor after 13 years!
83 posted on 12/15/2002 12:01:09 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
I don't know but it's very likely. The Division 44 in the APA is disproportionately homosexual.
84 posted on 12/15/2002 1:53:56 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
What's next? Foot binding?

I know the facts don’t concern the pro-sodomy crowds but foot binding isn’t a pathology, homosexuality is. All the sarcasm in the world can’t change that. Now go crawl back under the rock from whence you came.

85 posted on 12/15/2002 2:06:17 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
Men and women are made differently for a reason. To not have the desire to utilize one's differences for the right purpose is a disorder. Darwin comes into play here though..
86 posted on 12/15/2002 2:58:57 PM PST by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Foot binding is an attempt to deform what is natural into what is pleasing to somebody else. Forcing kids into roles they may not fit does them a great disservice. Tomboys may grow up to be perfectly hetero girls. Making them ashamed for being themselves is destructive. If there's a rock here, it's your head.
87 posted on 12/15/2002 3:08:45 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Thank you for the history of foot binding, too bad the analogy is inane. Comparing a pathology to something natural (i.e. comparing right behavior with wrong behavior) is in and of itself disordered.

Tomboys may grow up to be perfectly hetero girls.

Oh? They “may” but research show it’s likely that they won’t.

Making them ashamed for being themselves is destructive.

First of all who said that treatment involves shaming? Second, do you have some research that shows this treatment is “destructive”? I’ll bet you don’t. So are we to believe your OPINION or research that proves otherwise? Remember, sarcasm and stupidity is no replacement the facts and truth.

88 posted on 12/15/2002 3:54:01 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Trickyguy
That's what I decided ---it's better to not over-react over things little kids might do, I've seen tomboys grow up to still be tomboys but very boy-crazy and most little boys will at some point put on their mom's makeup just to see what it is ---out of curiosity ---if they're 1 or 2 when they do this, it means nothing ---but maybe means something if they're 15 or 16.
89 posted on 12/15/2002 4:26:59 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
"New book on parenting engenders anger in gays"

Male, Female, Gay, Lesbian, and now "EN" genders. The pecadillos one must study just to comprehend the news. Tut tut.

90 posted on 12/15/2002 8:54:24 PM PST by Uncle Miltie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: luckystarmom
I have identical twin daughters too!! It's been a lifetime of fun!
91 posted on 12/15/2002 10:38:48 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Of course they will. They did not drop homosexuality as a disorder because of any scientific study that proved otherwise (especially since none exist), but due to political pressure from homosexual activists.
92 posted on 12/16/2002 3:12:43 AM PST by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BrowningBAR
"They are ideas that the medical establishment rejected years ago."

Uhh ... before the medical establishment became politicized, Nicholosi's ideas were ideas that the medical establishment endorsed for hundreds of years. But, I bet that data won't make it into the next press release.

93 posted on 12/16/2002 7:47:29 AM PST by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband

The American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Medical Association all concluded about 30 years ago that homosexuality is not a disorder.

Everyone commenting on this phrase seems to forget about the following sentence.

More recently, they note that several studies indicate at least some biological basis for sexual orientation.

To rephrase this, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, and the American Medical Association all concluded decided to call homosexuality not a disorder and after 30 years of doing studies have finally found SOME evidence that they can twist to support their politically decided decsion. But it took them 30 years of searching to be able to find anything they call evidence of biologically based homosexuality.

By the way, there is ample evidence that addictive behaviors is at least partly genetic. I haven't heard of any shrinks that try to treat alcoholics by telling them that they are normal, should continue drinking and actually be proud they are different. Even if homosexuality is shown conclusively to be inborn, that still does not make it desireable.

And one other word - those who would attack someone because they are homosexual has a bigger disorder than the homosexual.

94 posted on 12/16/2002 8:09:38 AM PST by BruceS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
Message to crybaby gays & lesbian:


WE'RE HERE, WE'RE STRAIGHT, GET USED TO IT!!!
95 posted on 12/16/2002 11:07:49 AM PST by Copperhead61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Copperhead61; Clint N. Suhks; scripter; ppaul
Bump
96 posted on 12/16/2002 11:22:34 AM PST by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
When my little boy was three I thought he was playing too much with his twin sister's barbie dolls, telling them they were pretty and kissing them, so I got him a Ken doll but then I saw him throwing Ken at the wall or onto the ceiling and asked him what he was doing to Ken ---he was beating him up.

Sounds like your little boy is normal, though you better watch him. He might want to be a professional wrestler. Randy 'Macho Man' Savage, watch out!!!

97 posted on 12/16/2002 11:41:14 AM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
bump for later reading
98 posted on 12/16/2002 1:37:41 PM PST by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
New book ... engenders anger in gays

Was this deliberate humor?

99 posted on 12/16/2002 4:33:54 PM PST by Rytwyng
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
Bumping for your later reading.
100 posted on 12/16/2002 5:13:18 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson