Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No apology, more charges from Simon [GOP hopeful defends allegations to the shock of Davis' camp]
Contra Costa Times ^ | October 10, 2002 | Daniel Borenstein and Andrew LaMar

Posted on 10/10/2002 4:27:46 AM PDT by RonDog

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:29:49 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

As Bill Simon's allegations of illegal fund raising crumbled, the Republican candidate acknowledged late Wednesday that his charges against Gov. Gray Davis were unfounded.

But Simon did not apologize to the governor. He said he had "a good-faith basis" for believing the false accusation he made public Monday.


(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: billsimon; calgov2002; graydavis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
YES!!!

Davis to Simon: "Drop out."

Simon to Davis: "Nuts!"


1 posted on 10/10/2002 4:27:47 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RonDog
For the more traditional left-wing "Simon can do no right" spin on this story, which seems to be very POPULAR on this forum lately, see San Jose Mercury News:
Posted on Thu, Oct. 10, 2002 story:PUB_DESC
ANALYSIS
Simon's latest stumble might be fatal blow to GOP hopeful's campaign

Mercury News Sacramento Bureau
It was supposed to be the ``October Surprise'' that would knock Gov. Gray Davis off his game and give Republican Bill Simon the last-minute momentum he needed to oust the Democratic incumbent.

Instead, it has turned into a devastating debacle that may have sealed the Los Angeles investor's political doom.

In an extraordinary gamble that quickly went awry, Simon charged that Davis had illegally accepted a campaign contribution in the state Capitol. That single now-discredited allegation turned what had been Simon's greatest asset -- his theme that Davis has repeatedly sold out to please campaign contributors -- into the GOP candidate's biggest liability.

The controversy gave Simon the widespread television exposure that he has been unable to get by making news or buying ads -- but it was hardly the coverage he wanted. Four weeks before the election, the incident called into question the credibility of a candidate whose campaign has been plagued with stumbles.

``I don't think one can overstate the damage that's been done by this,'' said Republican political analyst Allan Hoffenblum. ``I think this totally destroys Simon's ability to convince voters that he's a credible alternative to the incumbent.''

For months, Simon has tried to galvanize opposition to Davis by attacking the governor's aggressive fundraising tactics. And he thought he had found the silver bullet when a public safety group told his campaign that they had photographs showing Davis breaking the law in 1998 by accepting a $10,000 check in his state Capitol office.

The photos for the first time gave television reporters the visual evidence they needed to illustrate Simon's main campaign theme. But the photos that aired prominently across California this week ended up illuminating Simon's blunder rather than the governor's wrongdoing.

In 24 hours, Simon's ploy undermined months of relentless assaults on the governor's ethics by trumpeting a baseless charge that Davis had broken the law.

Simon has stumbled numerous times since winning the GOP nomination in March, but many California political analysts viewed the latest Simon misstep as fatal.

``The Simon campaign was sort of dead anyway, but now it's basically a corpse kicking itself,'' said Bruce Cain, a political scientist at the University of California-Berkeley.

With the group that made the claim -- the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs -- retracting its allegations late Wednesday, GOP strategists urged Simon to admit his mistake and try to move on.

``The first thing Simon should do is apologize,'' said Dan Schnur, a political consultant who worked for former GOP Gov. Pete Wilson. ``That shows that he's willing to take responsibility for a mistake. The second thing he should do is fire someone.''

Despite Simon's attempts to blame COPS and distance himself from the controversy, his campaign had planned to use the charge as its ace in the hole.

Republican sources said the Simon campaign had heard about the COPS photographs three or four months ago and had been told by the group last week that they were preparing to make their allegations public.

After weighing the options, Simon agreed to set a trap for Davis on Monday afternoon in the first and only scheduled debate.

``Mr. Davis,'' Simon asked the governor, ``it is illegal to accept campaign contributions in state government office buildings. In your career, have you ever accepted a campaign contribution in the state Capitol or in any of your government offices? Please answer this question yes or no.''

Davis said he has always ``conducted himself within the law,'' and later told reporters he had no memory of ever taking such a donation.

Simon strategists hoped to lure Davis into a lie and then come forward the following day with the damning COPS photos.

But the strategy fell apart right after the debate. Reporters pressed Simon about whether he had hard evidence that Davis had broken the law, as he had implied in the live televised debate.

At first, Simon balked and told reporters to ``stay tuned.'' When reporters persisted, Simon strategist Ed Rollins caught the candidate's attention and gave him the green light to say that he did have evidence.

That sparked an angry demand from reporters for Simon to prove his explosive allegation.

In yet another example of the disarray in the campaign, high-level Simon strategists complained that they had been denied the chance to check out the photos and had to rely on assurances from COPS. Several Simon advisers said they weren't shown the photos until COPS held its news conference on Tuesday.

``A campaign that was doing well would have had a difficult time recovering from such a fiasco,'' said Hoffenblum. ``For one that's already on the ropes, this may well have been the fatal blow.''


Mercury News Staff Writer Mark Gladstone contributed to this report. Contact Dion Nissenbaum at dnissenbaum@sjmercury.com or (916) 441-4603.

2 posted on 10/10/2002 4:35:50 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
From www.EnterStageRight.com:

The "Eleventh Commandment"

By David C. Wilcox
web posted April 8, 2002

Ronald Reagan in 1966During Ronald Reagan's 1966 campaign for governor of California, Republicans established the so-called Eleventh Commandment: "Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican."

It was proposed by State Republican Chairman Gaylord Parkinson to help prevent a repeat of the liberal Republican assault on Barry Goldwater that laid the foundation for Goldwater's trouncing in the 1964 presidential election. Just as Nelson Rockefeller and his East Coast cronies had branded Goldwater as an "extremist" who was unfit to hold office, so candidate George Christopher and California's liberal Republicans were leveling similar personal attacks on Reagan. Party liberals eventually followed Parkinson's advice, and the rest is history.

more

3 posted on 10/10/2002 4:45:55 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
I like this one developed and part of the Rat playbook.....

"It is not the accusation that is important, it is the seriousness of the charges that cause us such concern" Use it Mr.Lott. Make them regret the caustic linguistics and lies they spew to an ever increasingly stupid public.

4 posted on 10/10/2002 4:48:13 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
YES!!!

Davis to Simon: "Drop out."
Simon to Davis: "Nuts!"

From www.military.com:

Gen. Anthony McAuliffe
Asked to Surrender at Bastogne, Surrounded Commander Said "Nuts"

Military.com Image
McAuliffe receives the D.S.C. from General George S. Patton
in late December of 1944 at Bastogne.
(U.S. Army photo)
Gen. Anthony Clement McAuliffe is best remembered for uttering a single word -- no mean feat, considering that even the shortest Bible verse has two. Commanding the U.S. Army’s beleaguered and surrounded 101st Airborne Division during World War II’s Battle of the Bulge, McAuliffe received a German surrender ultimatum. "Nuts!" he replied, and became a lasting symbol of American courage and determination under fire.

A 1918 West Point graduate, McAuliffe held various field artillery positions before World War II. On the eve of D-Day, McAuliffe jumped with the first wave as a commander of division artillery, although he had never received formal parachute training.

In December 1944, during the siege of Bastogne, Belgium, McAuliffe was acting commander of the 101st in Gen. Maxwell D. Taylor’s absence. The Americans had been holding the Belgian town "at all costs," and on Dec. 22, Gen. McAuliffe received the encouraging news that the 4th Armored Division was beginning its drive north to relieve the 101st. Later that morning, members of the division’s glider regiment saw four Germans coming up the road carrying a white flag. Everyone hoped they were offering surrender. Instead, they presented two pages demanding the Americans’ surrender: "To the USA Commander of the encircled town of Bastogne. . .There is only one possibility. . .the honorable surrender of the encircled town."

McAuliffe glanced at the message and said, "Aw, nuts!" When he told his commanders he didn’t know what answer to send, Lt. Col. Harry Kinnard said ‘That first crack you made would be hard to beat, General." Everyone laughed as a sergeant typed up the succinct response: "To the German Commander: Nuts! The American Commander."

Between this stoic reply, Patton’s troops from the south, and a change in the weather that allowed air reinforcement the following day, the 101st was able to hold Bastogne. Their victory resulted in the first full-Division Presidential Distinguished Unit Citation.

McAuliffe’s actions at Bastogne helped assure the final defeat of the Germans. Gen. McAuliffe continued to serve on active duty, including assignments as Head of the Army Chemical Corps, Commander, 7th Army, and Commander-In-Chief of the U.S. Army, Europe, until his 1956 retirement. He died in Washington, D.C. in 1975 and is buried at Arlington National Cemetery.

5 posted on 10/10/2002 5:03:11 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
My thinking regarding this statement is this: Someone, somewhere knew EXACTLY where this donation took place. Others know EXACTLY where that picture in the background is located. Yet, no one has provided this information to any media outlet?

Methinks the media is trying to spin the Simon-blunder angle hot and heavy, before ultimately reporting the truth on the location, showing Simon was right all along.

You can bet someone in the media knows where this exchange took place. Why hasn't it been reported?

6 posted on 10/10/2002 5:06:15 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Davis called on Simon to withdraw from the race. "As a former prosecutor, he should certainly be embarrassed, and if he had any sense of honor, he would drop out of the race,"

He didn't say that about Gary Con-did-it, now did he?

7 posted on 10/10/2002 5:13:35 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnnaZ; Mercuria; feinswinesuksass; DoughtyOne; Cinnamon Girl; Tony in Hawaii; Bob J; diotima; ...
"The Simon move amazed analysts and left Davis campaign spokesman Garry South dumbfounded..."
PING!
8 posted on 10/10/2002 5:40:08 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Simon was hoaxed and stupidly went forward with the pic before verifying its veracity.

He's got idiots running his campaign.
9 posted on 10/10/2002 6:19:53 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
"The American public is very forgiving when they are directly apologized to," she said. "I can't imagine anyone would listen to new charges until the air is cleared on this allegation." Jack Pitney, government professor at Claremont McKenna College, said that Simon's situation "has crossed the line from bad to bizarre."

Where was all this "righteous indignation" when Gray Out called Simon a criminal as a result of the unfounded verdict against Simon's company? The verdict was later thrown out, but did Davis apologize or drop out of the race? Of course not.

Hold your ground, Simon. That's the only way to stand up to bullies.

10 posted on 10/10/2002 6:20:49 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
11 posted on 10/10/2002 6:36:48 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Uh, I don't see any bias. I see Bill Simon acting like a complete horse's arse. I agree with Gay Davis (gag!)- Simon should drop out. He's an embarrasement.
12 posted on 10/10/2002 6:37:05 AM PDT by That Subliminal Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
As I said on numerous threads on this $10,000 photo op, the key was to locate that huge modern artwork on the wall behind Angele. That was unique, expensive, and known.

Now the painting has been located. It was and is on private property. And receipt of a campaign donation on private property is legal in California. So the charge based on the photograph is false.

But the general charge, that Davis runs a "cash-and-carry" Administration, remains and is true. Bribery of public officials is usually proved through "kickbacks." Official steers contract to company. Company kicks back part of the contract price to official.

Davis is more subtle than that. He deals in "kickfronts." (I invented that word, so please give credit where credit is due.) Company donates money to official's campaign, not to him personally. Board or administrator appointed by official then gives valuable benefits to company. The payment to the official comes before the act, not after.

Of course, the kickfront requires the company to believe that the official will keep his part of the bargain. It requires that the official be an "honest politician." That is using the Maryland-New Jersey definition of an honest politician, "Once he's bought, he stays bought."

Unless someone turns states' evidence and squeals, the kickfront pattern is legal on its face. Nathanson did turn states' evidence. That's why Davis has fought for two years to keep the courts from releasing that document. Now that the US Supreme Court declined to act on that case on Monday of this week, the Nathanson letter will probably hit the papers before the Simon-Davis election.

It might have a similar impact as the Chang Memorandum did on Senator Robert ("the Public Official") Torricelli. Governor Gray ("high public official") Davis should then be referred to that way, because that's the code phrase used for Davis in the Nathanson letter.

Congressman Billybob

Click for "Oedipus and the Democrats"

Click for "Til Death Do Us Part."

Click for "to Restore Trust in America"

13 posted on 10/10/2002 6:37:12 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Lesson in biased reporting.

As written: As Bill Simon's allegations of illegal fund raising crumbled, the Republican candidate acknowledged late Wednesday that his charges against Gov. Gray Davis were unfounded

If written more objectively: As the evidence for one of many allegations of illegal fund raising by Gov. Gray Davis crumbled, the Republican candidate acknowledged late Wednesday that his charges against Gov. Gray Davis were based on a source that let him down

Quiz next Wednesday.

Dan

14 posted on 10/10/2002 6:45:40 AM PDT by BibChr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
"Simon was hoaxed and stupidly went forward with the pic before verifying its veracity."

Simon had never seen the picture, COPS didn't release it until the day after Simons comments, and they didn't release it to Simon.

BTW why don't you mind your own business, NE liberal!
15 posted on 10/10/2002 6:52:45 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
The house, with an abstract painting by artist David Amico, belonged in 1998 to Bruce Karatz, chairman and CEO of KB Home. The company was then called Kaufman and Broad.

In the photos, "the door behind Gray leads into his (Karatz') den," said company vice president Larry Gotlieb. "(Karatz) recognized the door that leads into his den and he recognized the Amico painting."

Karatz has since sold the 8,451-square-foot house. But Gotlieb said Karatz still owns the distinctive painting that is shown in the photos.

Gotlieb said Karatz hosted a campaign meeting on the morning of Jan. 31, 1998, the day the photos were taken. Gotlieb said he also attended the meeting.

I know this sounds silly, but I still think these guys are lying.

Looking at that picture, there is no way that's in someone's house. That's a heavy-duty door, the type of which is typically only found in public buildings. I'm just not buying that explanation.

16 posted on 10/10/2002 6:57:58 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Good call on the painting. Too bad Simon has no streets smarts. I don't think the voters want a candidate who can't see that he is getting set up. They rather have the corrupt guy is has savy.
17 posted on 10/10/2002 6:58:30 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
That sparked an angry demand from reporters for Simon to prove his explosive allegation.

There was a similar phrase used in an article yesterday, before the alleged "real venue" was revealed (finally).

Why do the reporters characterize themselves as "angry"??

I find it most illuminating.

18 posted on 10/10/2002 6:58:58 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: That Subliminal Kid
Simon should drop out.

Get a grip, Kid. That is an over-reaction.

19 posted on 10/10/2002 7:00:09 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
Simon should have never mentioned the issue and should have let surrogates do it. Thats poly-sci 101. There is not a single long-time freeper that would have made the same mistake on acting without verifying.
20 posted on 10/10/2002 7:00:26 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson