Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just another Joe
The subject of the thread is the rights of the property owner to allow a legal commodity to be consumed in their place of business.

If the business is open to the public, it's gonna be regulated. In California no smoking is allowed where members of the general public are present.

Private clubs are another matter.

251 posted on 10/03/2002 9:52:11 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies ]


To: Roscoe
Private clubs are another matter.

Anything is allowed in private clubs? I'm glad to see you support that. LOL

254 posted on 10/03/2002 9:53:50 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: Roscoe
In California no smoking is allowed where members of the general public are present.

That's not quite correct but I'll give you a little leeway.
It also wasn't a thought on the subject of the thread.
Lacking proof of harm, why would the dissolution of a persons property rights , to allow a LEGAL commodity to be consumed in their place of business, be allowed?
I can give you the short answer now but you probably won't like it.

265 posted on 10/03/2002 10:15:02 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson