To: steve50
You should have threatened to not vote for him, even if you intend to. What reason does he have to take your position into consideration if he knows he has your vote anyway? I'm sure you hate to lie, but since you're dealing with politicans..."when in Rome" comes to mind. Steve! What other choice do I HAVE up here! If I don't vote for him, some Democrud will get his seat. Which is the better of two evils?
14 posted on
09/07/2002 8:07:44 AM PDT by
SheLion
To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; red-dawg; ...
15 posted on
09/07/2002 8:54:22 AM PDT by
SheLion
To: SheLion
I know, SheLion. But he has to believe he runs the risk of losing votes or he has no incentive to change his position. By telling him you will still support him with your vote you have made your objection to his policy meaningless, at least make him think he is going to lose votes.
16 posted on
09/07/2002 9:00:18 AM PDT by
steve50
To: SheLion
You should have threatened to not vote for him, even if you intend to. What reason does he have to take your position into consideration if he knows he has your vote anyway? I'm sure you hate to lie, but since you're dealing with politicans..."when in Rome" comes to mind. Steve, I received email from Irvin. The man isn't running again. He is having a retirement dinner up here on the 21st of Sept. I felt like an ass.
40 posted on
09/09/2002 2:00:38 PM PDT by
SheLion
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
