Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smokers Bristle Over Cigarette Taxes, But generally tolerant of restrictions on smoking in public
Gallup News Service ^ | 8/15/02 | Gallup Poll Analysis by Lydia Saad

Posted on 08/14/2002 11:43:01 PM PDT by Jean S

PRINCETON, NJ -- Calling it "the most important measure my administration may take to save people's lives," New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently championed a hefty cigarette tax increase, driving cigarette prices in his city to twice the national average. And it's not just New York that is boosting the tax burden on smokers. USA Today reports that so far this year, 15 states have approved cigarette tax increases. Now, with smoking already forbidden in New York offices, public buildings and most restaurants, Bloomberg announced his intention to ban it in one of the last bastions of public accommodation of smokers: bars.

With government taxes and regulations tightening around smokers, are they angry, have they been driven to the decision to quit, or are they more resolved than ever to continue their habit?

Major Conclusions

Over the last decade, smokers have generally seemed tolerant of increased restrictions on smoking in public places. Gallup's most recent survey on smoking, conducted July 9-11, 2002, found only 39% of smokers feeling "unjustly discriminated against" by these regulations; 58% said the restrictions are justified. These attitudes have not changed since 1994. By contrast, a majority of smokers express resentment about rising cigarette taxes: Two-thirds (68%) say they feel unjustly discriminated against by the increase in taxes, while just 29% believe the increases are justified.

Between one-quarter and one-third of smokers tell Gallup that these measures are causing them to smoke less. The indication that government efforts may have a modest impact on smoking is also seen in the prevalence of adult smoking, which has declined slightly over the past decade and a half.

Among current smokers, it appears that government policies are having only a limited impact on the amount people smoke. From 1999-2000 the number of cigarettes individuals smoked per week seemed to be declining, but that was reversed this year. The percentage of smokers who would like to quit is only slightly higher today than it has been in the past.

Two types of reasons are generally given for raising taxes on cigarettes: one is to discourage smoking and the other to provide the government with money to offset the healthcare costs associated with smoking. Smokers oppose tax increases on cigarettes for either reason, although they are more amenable to the cost argument than the health one. Non-smokers widely support raising cigarette taxes for either reason.

Details

Smokers’ Reaction to Anti-Smoking Policies
July 9-11, 2002

Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking
Among National Adults

Smoke More Than One Pack a Day

Smoking in Restaurants, 2001

Smokers

Non-smokers

%

%

Ban

22

53

Set aside

69

45

No restrictions

8

2

Smoking in Workplaces, 2001

Smokers

Non-smokers

%

%

Ban

17

46

Set aside

76

51

No restrictions

5

2

Smoking in Hotels/Motels, 2001

Smokers

Non-smokers

%

%

Ban

10

34

Set aside

77

61

No restrictions

12

4

Survey Methods

These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 1,004 adults, aged 18 and older, conducted July 9-11, 2002. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

Have you, yourself, smoked any cigarettes in the past week?

Yes

No

Yes

No

%

%

%

%

2002 Jul 9-11

24

76

1989 Apr 4-9

29

71

1988 Jul 1-7

32

68

2001 Jul 19-22

28

72

1987 Mar 14-18

30

70

2000 Nov 13-15

25

75

1986 Jun 9-16

31

69

1999 Sep 23-26

23

77

1985 Jun 7-10

35

65

1998 Jun 22-23

28

72

1983

38

62

1997 Sep 25-28

26

74

1981 Jun 26-29

35

65

1997 Jun 26-29

26

74

1978 Jan 20-23

36

64

1997 Jun 23-24

26

74

1977 Aug 19-22

38

62

1997 May 6-7

25

75

1974 May 10-13

40

60

1997 Mar 24-26

27

73

1972 Apr 21-24

43

57

1996 May 9-12

27

73

1971 May 14-17

42

58

1994 Jul 15-17

27

73

1969 Jul 24-29

40

60

1994 Mar 11-13

27

73

1957

42

58

1991 Nov 7-10

28

72

1954

45

55

1990 Jul 6-8

27

73

1949

44

56

1989 May 15-18

27

73

1944

41

59

About how many cigarettes do you smoke each day?

BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS

Less than
one pack

One
pack

More than one pack

No
answer

Mean

%

%

%

%

%

2002 Jul 9-11

54

29

17

*

16

2001 Jul 19-22

59

29

11

*

15

2000 Nov 13-15

62

29

9

0

15

1999 Sep 23-26

55

35

9

1

14

1997 Jun 26-29

48

32

19

1

--

1997 Jun 23-24

48

30

21

1

--

1996 May 9-12

43

38

16

3

--

1994 Mar 11-13

44

38

18

0

--

1991 Nov 7-10

48

34

17

1

--

1990 Jul 6-8

51

32

14

3

--

1989 May 15-18

39

39

20

2

--

1988 Jul 1-7

40

38

20

2

--

1987 Mar 14-18

48

32

18

2

--

1986 Jun 9-16

43

33

22

2

--

1981 Jan 26-29

38

37

24

1

--

1977 Aug 19-22

41

31

27

1

--

All things considered, would you like to give up smoking, or not?

BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS

Yes

No

No opinion

%

%

%

2002 Jul 9-11

79

18

3

2000 Nov 13-15

82

16

2

1999 Sep 23-26

76

23

1

1997 Jun 26-29

74

24

2

1997 Jun 23-24

64

34

2

1996 May 9-12

73

26

1

1994 Mar 11-13

70

28

2

1991 Nov 7-10

76

22

2

1990 Jul 6-8

74

24

2

1989 May 15-18

63

33

4

1988 Jul 1-7

68

27

5

1987 Mar 14-18

77

20

3

1986 Jun 9-16

75

22

3

1981 Jun 26-29

66

30

4

1977 Aug 19-22

66

29

5

As a result of increased restrictions on smoking in public places, do you feel unjustly discriminated against as a smoker, or do you think the restrictions are justified?

BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS

Yes, unjustly discriminated against

No, restrictions
are justified

No
opinion

%

%

%

2002 Jul 9-11

39

58

3

2001 Jul 19-22

32

65

3

1994 Mar 11-13

39

60

1

Would you say you, personally, are smoking less because of these restrictions, or not?

BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS

Yes, smoking less

No, not smoking less

No opinion

%

%

%

2002 Jul 9-11

28

71

1

1994 Mar 11-13

30

70

0

As a result of increased taxes on cigarettes, do you feel unjustly discriminated against as a smoker, or do you think these tax increases are justified?

BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS

Yes, unjustly discriminated against

No, restrictions
are justified

No
opinion

2002 Jul 9-11

68%

29%

3%

Would you say you, personally, are smoking less because of these tax increases, or not?

BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS

Yes, smoking less

No, not smoking less

No opinion

2002 Jul 9-11

27%

71%

2%

Did you, yourself, ever smoke cigarettes on a regular basis?

BASED ON --791-- NON-SMOKERS

Yes

No

No answer

2002 Jul 9-11

34%

66%

*

Do you consider the amount of taxes on a pack of cigarettes as -- [ROTATED: too high, about right, or too low]?

Too high

About right

Too low

No opinion

2002 Jul 9-11

40%

27%

26%

7%

Which of the following statements concerning new tax increases on cigarettes do you agree with more -- [ROTATED: cigarette taxes should be raised by substantial amounts in order to discourage smoking (or) cigarette taxes should not be raised by substantial amounts because doing so would unfairly discriminate against smokers]?

BASED ON --508-- NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM A


Raised


Not raised

Other
(vol.)

Depends (vol.)

No
opinion

2002 Jul 9-11

46%

50%

1%

1%

2%

Which of the following statements concerning new tax increases on cigarettes do you agree with more -- [rotatED: cigarette taxes should be raised by substantial amounts in order to help state and local governments pay for the health costs related to smoking (or) cigarette taxes should not be raised by substantial amounts because doing so would unfairly discriminate against smokers]?

BASED ON --496-- NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM B


Raised


Not raised

Other
(vol.)

Depends (vol.)

No
opinion

2002 Jul 9-11

55%

39%

2%

1%

3%

 


Source: Gallup.com
Date Released: 8/15/2002
Location: http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr020815.asp


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: bloomberg; cigarettetax; pufflist

1 posted on 08/14/2002 11:43:01 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Thanks for posting.
2 posted on 08/14/2002 11:44:50 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Damn, reading this made me want a cigarrette.
3 posted on 08/14/2002 11:54:29 PM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Hey I don't even smoke and everytime I hear a smoking nazis story I wanna light up. I don't know what kind of tact to take with restriction tolerant smokers though.. do I just say "fine, I'm done fighting for you if you won't fight for yourselves, don't come crying to me when smoking is made illegal everywhere"... OR do I keep fighting, knowing that I'm not just fighting for smokers rights, I'm fighting for the right to imbibe in something that may not be good for me, because it's my decision as a taxpaying adult." ??
4 posted on 08/15/2002 12:02:05 AM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Between 1986 and 1989, an average of 30% of Americans told Gallup that they had smoked any cigarettes within the past week. In Gallup's July 2002 survey, the figure is only 24%.

I sometimes question these figures and wonder if there aren't many closet smokers.

Within our Houston FReeper Chapter the percentage of smokers is 80 - 90%. Are conservatives more likely to smoke because they more willing to make decisions for themselves, rather than live by the Nanny State guidelines?

---

Flyer

5 posted on 08/15/2002 12:09:05 AM PDT by Flyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; SheLion; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity

6 posted on 08/15/2002 12:48:05 AM PDT by KS Flyover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
I sometimes question these figures and wonder if there aren't many closet smokers

While I can't give you any figures, I can give you an example... our "new" family doctor is my wife's age- 43- and publically rabidly anti- smoking...

...she smokes... just not in public.

7 posted on 08/15/2002 1:39:59 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
Definately choose the OR

You're Next.

And many of us are fighting. As a result of Michigan Republicans jamming through our latest tax hike, I will never vote for a Republican again at the state level (I won't vote for Dem's either - although they opposed the tax). I buy Indian and foreign smokes. Be assured that the Nanny govt. will not stop at smoking.
8 posted on 08/15/2002 3:07:50 AM PDT by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Self-interest appears to play an important role in the formation of attitudes toward cigarette taxation policy. Smokers widely oppose raising taxes on cigarettes, whether purportedly for their own good (83% are opposed) or as financial compensation to government for smoking-related health costs (70% are opposed). A majority of non-smokers favor both proposals; 58% favor taxes aimed at discouraging smoking; 62% favor it to recoup health costs.

First, they came for the smokers, but since I wasn't a smoker, I didn't care....

I bet they'd howl with outrage if the gov started taxing their favorite habit/vice. Big Mac tax? SUV tax?

I wish those who advocate taxes on OTHER people would realize the gov is raising taxes because they want more money to spend, not because they're trying to reform smokers.

9 posted on 08/15/2002 3:27:32 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flyer
I’m glad I quit in 1986 – before the smoke-nazis took charge of our lives. If I were still smoking, I’d probably never quit – out of defiance! Stupid reason, I know, but quitting was very hard; defiance is easy by comparison!

C'mon, Smokers ... DEFY! You have more support than you realize.

10 posted on 08/15/2002 4:19:30 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
I hope you stick with your third option.

More and more smokers are waking up to what is going on and are fighting and fighting hard. But we are at a major disadvantage, we're all just regular folks. The anti-smokers are well financed by major corporations and taxpayer dollars. We need all the help we can get.

I'm also starting to see more non-smokers balking at the tactics of the anti-smokers because of the claim of the antis that they are speaking for ALL non-smokers.

11 posted on 08/15/2002 7:53:27 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: self_evident
You make an interesting point about the Dems. Here in Delaware the majority of those that voted against the total smoking ban were Dems and many of the backers of various cigarette tax increases are Republicans.
12 posted on 08/15/2002 7:56:08 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bimbo
LOL!!! My husband says the only reason he continues to smoke is as a political statement. He does not believe a politician has the right to tell him how to live his life, and he knows better than they do.

C'mon, Smokers ... DEFY! You have more support than you realize.

According to the anti-smoker propaganda you are wrong. weren't you aware that the anti-smoker organizations represent the position of ALL non-smokers? They continually tell us this, so it must be true. /sarcasm

Thank you for your support.

13 posted on 08/15/2002 8:01:13 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
to provide the government with money to offset the healthcare costs associated with smoking.

Here they go again, the taxes provide for politicians wasting money, spend like drunken sailors and whom hasn't got the foggiest idea about finances.

14 posted on 08/15/2002 8:13:35 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodieD
OR do I keep fighting, knowing that I'm not just fighting for smokers rights, I'm fighting for the right to imbibe in something that may not be good for me, because it's my decision as a taxpaying adult." ??

Thank you, and keep up the good fight because you are right, it isn't just about smoking.......... they are now officially going after fast food, using the same ANTI SMOKING lawyer yet.

15 posted on 08/15/2002 8:18:21 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
While I can't give you any figures, I can give you an example... our "new" family doctor is my wife's age- 43- and publically rabidly anti- smoking... ...she smokes... just not in public.

There is a lot more of that going on than we know, same goes for frothing at the mouth politicians.

16 posted on 08/15/2002 8:20:58 AM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: self_evident
Exactly. We are on our way to a new Prohibition era..of EVERYTHING.. and we will enjoy all the 'benefits' that prohibition had to offer...like a rise in organized crime, and turning ordinary citizens into criminals... of course California has already managed to do that on so many levels.
17 posted on 08/15/2002 9:44:39 AM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson