Posted on 08/14/2002 11:43:01 PM PDT by Jean S
PRINCETON, NJ -- Calling it "the most important measure my administration may take to save people's lives," New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently championed a hefty cigarette tax increase, driving cigarette prices in his city to twice the national average. And it's not just New York that is boosting the tax burden on smokers. USA Today reports that so far this year, 15 states have approved cigarette tax increases. Now, with smoking already forbidden in New York offices, public buildings and most restaurants, Bloomberg announced his intention to ban it in one of the last bastions of public accommodation of smokers: bars.
With government taxes and regulations tightening around smokers, are they angry, have they been driven to the decision to quit, or are they more resolved than ever to continue their habit?
Major Conclusions
Over the last decade, smokers have generally seemed tolerant of increased restrictions on smoking in public places. Gallup's most recent survey on smoking, conducted July 9-11, 2002, found only 39% of smokers feeling "unjustly discriminated against" by these regulations; 58% said the restrictions are justified. These attitudes have not changed since 1994. By contrast, a majority of smokers express resentment about rising cigarette taxes: Two-thirds (68%) say they feel unjustly discriminated against by the increase in taxes, while just 29% believe the increases are justified.
Between one-quarter and one-third of smokers tell Gallup that these measures are causing them to smoke less. The indication that government efforts may have a modest impact on smoking is also seen in the prevalence of adult smoking, which has declined slightly over the past decade and a half.
Among current smokers, it appears that government policies are having only a limited impact on the amount people smoke. From 1999-2000 the number of cigarettes individuals smoked per week seemed to be declining, but that was reversed this year. The percentage of smokers who would like to quit is only slightly higher today than it has been in the past.
Two types of reasons are generally given for raising taxes on cigarettes: one is to discourage smoking and the other to provide the government with money to offset the healthcare costs associated with smoking. Smokers oppose tax increases on cigarettes for either reason, although they are more amenable to the cost argument than the health one. Non-smokers widely support raising cigarette taxes for either reason.
Details
Smokers Reaction to Anti-Smoking Policies |
July 9-11, 2002 |
Prevalence of Cigarette Smoking Among National Adults |
Smoke More Than One Pack a Day |
Smoking in Restaurants, 2001 |
||
Smokers |
Non-smokers |
|
% |
% |
|
Ban |
22 |
53 |
Set aside |
69 |
45 |
No restrictions |
8 |
2 |
Smoking in Workplaces, 2001 |
||
Smokers |
Non-smokers |
|
% |
% |
|
Ban |
17 |
46 |
Set aside |
76 |
51 |
No restrictions |
5 |
2 |
Smoking in Hotels/Motels, 2001 |
||
Smokers |
Non-smokers |
|
% |
% |
|
Ban |
10 |
34 |
Set aside |
77 |
61 |
No restrictions |
12 |
4 |
Survey Methods
These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected national sample of 1,004 adults, aged 18 and older, conducted July 9-11, 2002. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
Have you, yourself, smoked any cigarettes in the past week?
Yes |
No |
Yes |
No |
|||
% |
% |
% |
% |
|||
2002 Jul 9-11 |
24 |
76 |
1989 Apr 4-9 |
29 |
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
1988 Jul 1-7 |
32 |
68 |
2001 Jul 19-22 |
28 |
72 |
1987 Mar 14-18 |
30 |
70 |
|
2000 Nov 13-15 |
25 |
75 |
1986 Jun 9-16 |
31 |
69 |
|
1999 Sep 23-26 |
23 |
77 |
1985 Jun 7-10 |
35 |
65 |
|
1998 Jun 22-23 |
28 |
72 |
1983 |
38 |
62 |
|
1997 Sep 25-28 |
26 |
74 |
1981 Jun 26-29 |
35 |
65 |
|
1997 Jun 26-29 |
26 |
74 |
1978 Jan 20-23 |
36 |
64 |
|
1997 Jun 23-24 |
26 |
74 |
1977 Aug 19-22 |
38 |
62 |
|
1997 May 6-7 |
25 |
75 |
1974 May 10-13 |
40 |
60 |
|
1997 Mar 24-26 |
27 |
73 |
1972 Apr 21-24 |
43 |
57 |
|
1996 May 9-12 |
27 |
73 |
1971 May 14-17 |
42 |
58 |
|
1994 Jul 15-17 |
27 |
73 |
1969 Jul 24-29 |
40 |
60 |
|
1994 Mar 11-13 |
27 |
73 |
1957 |
42 |
58 |
|
1991 Nov 7-10 |
28 |
72 |
1954 |
45 |
55 |
|
1990 Jul 6-8 |
27 |
73 |
1949 |
44 |
56 |
|
1989 May 15-18 |
27 |
73 |
1944 |
41 |
59 |
About how many cigarettes do you smoke each day?
BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS
Less than |
One |
More than one pack |
No |
Mean |
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
54 |
29 |
17 |
* |
16 |
2001 Jul 19-22 |
59 |
29 |
11 |
* |
15 |
2000 Nov 13-15 |
62 |
29 |
9 |
0 |
15 |
1999 Sep 23-26 |
55 |
35 |
9 |
1 |
14 |
1997 Jun 26-29 |
48 |
32 |
19 |
1 |
-- |
1997 Jun 23-24 |
48 |
30 |
21 |
1 |
-- |
1996 May 9-12 |
43 |
38 |
16 |
3 |
-- |
1994 Mar 11-13 |
44 |
38 |
18 |
0 |
-- |
1991 Nov 7-10 |
48 |
34 |
17 |
1 |
-- |
1990 Jul 6-8 |
51 |
32 |
14 |
3 |
-- |
1989 May 15-18 |
39 |
39 |
20 |
2 |
-- |
1988 Jul 1-7 |
40 |
38 |
20 |
2 |
-- |
1987 Mar 14-18 |
48 |
32 |
18 |
2 |
-- |
1986 Jun 9-16 |
43 |
33 |
22 |
2 |
-- |
1981 Jan 26-29 |
38 |
37 |
24 |
1 |
-- |
1977 Aug 19-22 |
41 |
31 |
27 |
1 |
-- |
All things considered, would you like to give up smoking, or not?
BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS
Yes |
No |
No opinion |
|
% |
% |
% |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
79 |
18 |
3 |
2000 Nov 13-15 |
82 |
16 |
2 |
1999 Sep 23-26 |
76 |
23 |
1 |
1997 Jun 26-29 |
74 |
24 |
2 |
1997 Jun 23-24 |
64 |
34 |
2 |
1996 May 9-12 |
73 |
26 |
1 |
1994 Mar 11-13 |
70 |
28 |
2 |
1991 Nov 7-10 |
76 |
22 |
2 |
1990 Jul 6-8 |
74 |
24 |
2 |
1989 May 15-18 |
63 |
33 |
4 |
1988 Jul 1-7 |
68 |
27 |
5 |
1987 Mar 14-18 |
77 |
20 |
3 |
1986 Jun 9-16 |
75 |
22 |
3 |
1981 Jun 26-29 |
66 |
30 |
4 |
1977 Aug 19-22 |
66 |
29 |
5 |
As a result of increased restrictions on smoking in public places, do you feel unjustly discriminated against as a smoker, or do you think the restrictions are justified?
BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS
|
Yes, unjustly discriminated against |
No, restrictions |
No |
% |
% |
% |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
39 |
58 |
3 |
2001 Jul 19-22 |
32 |
65 |
3 |
1994 Mar 11-13 |
39 |
60 |
1 |
Would you say you, personally, are smoking less because of these restrictions, or not?
BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS
|
Yes, smoking less |
No, not smoking less |
No opinion |
% |
% |
% |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
28 |
71 |
1 |
1994 Mar 11-13 |
30 |
70 |
0 |
As a result of increased taxes on cigarettes, do you feel unjustly discriminated against as a smoker, or do you think these tax increases are justified?
BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS
|
Yes, unjustly discriminated against |
No, restrictions |
No |
2002 Jul 9-11 |
68% |
29% |
3% |
Would you say you, personally, are smoking less because of these tax increases, or not?
BASED ON --213-- SMOKERS
|
Yes, smoking less |
No, not smoking less |
No opinion |
2002 Jul 9-11 |
27% |
71% |
2% |
Did you, yourself, ever smoke cigarettes on a regular basis?
BASED ON --791-- NON-SMOKERS
|
Yes |
No |
No answer |
2002 Jul 9-11 |
34% |
66% |
* |
Do you consider the amount of taxes on a pack of cigarettes as -- [ROTATED: too high, about right, or too low]?
Too high |
About right |
Too low |
No opinion |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
40% |
27% |
26% |
7% |
Which of the following statements concerning new tax increases on cigarettes do you agree with more -- [ROTATED: cigarette taxes should be raised by substantial amounts in order to discourage smoking (or) cigarette taxes should not be raised by substantial amounts because doing so would unfairly discriminate against smokers]?
BASED ON --508-- NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM A
|
|
Other |
Depends (vol.) |
No |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
46% |
50% |
1% |
1% |
2% |
Which of the following statements concerning new tax increases on cigarettes do you agree with more -- [rotatED: cigarette taxes should be raised by substantial amounts in order to help state and local governments pay for the health costs related to smoking (or) cigarette taxes should not be raised by substantial amounts because doing so would unfairly discriminate against smokers]?
BASED ON --496-- NATIONAL ADULTS IN FORM B
|
|
Other |
Depends (vol.) |
No |
|
2002 Jul 9-11 |
55% |
39% |
2% |
1% |
3% |
Source: | Gallup.com |
Date Released: | 8/15/2002 |
Location: | http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr020815.asp |
I sometimes question these figures and wonder if there aren't many closet smokers.
Within our Houston FReeper Chapter the percentage of smokers is 80 - 90%. Are conservatives more likely to smoke because they more willing to make decisions for themselves, rather than live by the Nanny State guidelines?
---
While I can't give you any figures, I can give you an example... our "new" family doctor is my wife's age- 43- and publically rabidly anti- smoking...
...she smokes... just not in public.
First, they came for the smokers, but since I wasn't a smoker, I didn't care....
I bet they'd howl with outrage if the gov started taxing their favorite habit/vice. Big Mac tax? SUV tax?
I wish those who advocate taxes on OTHER people would realize the gov is raising taxes because they want more money to spend, not because they're trying to reform smokers.
C'mon, Smokers ... DEFY! You have more support than you realize.
More and more smokers are waking up to what is going on and are fighting and fighting hard. But we are at a major disadvantage, we're all just regular folks. The anti-smokers are well financed by major corporations and taxpayer dollars. We need all the help we can get.
I'm also starting to see more non-smokers balking at the tactics of the anti-smokers because of the claim of the antis that they are speaking for ALL non-smokers.
C'mon, Smokers ... DEFY! You have more support than you realize.
According to the anti-smoker propaganda you are wrong. weren't you aware that the anti-smoker organizations represent the position of ALL non-smokers? They continually tell us this, so it must be true. /sarcasm
Thank you for your support.
Here they go again, the taxes provide for politicians wasting money, spend like drunken sailors and whom hasn't got the foggiest idea about finances.
Thank you, and keep up the good fight because you are right, it isn't just about smoking.......... they are now officially going after fast food, using the same ANTI SMOKING lawyer yet.
There is a lot more of that going on than we know, same goes for frothing at the mouth politicians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.