Posted on 08/12/2002 6:19:40 AM PDT by Valin
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:36:57 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
CLEVELAND -- I've written 14 movies. My characters smoke in many of them, and they look cool and glamorous doing it.
Smoking was an integral part of many of my screenplays because I was a militant smoker. It was part of a bad-boy image I'd cultivated for a long time -- smoking, drinking, partying: rock 'n' roll.
(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...
"I love it when the grandchildren come over to visit. It brings such a smile to my face. My smile gets even bigger when they leave."
True, his screenplays are rated R and NC-17 and are not to be viewed by "a 12-or 14-year-old". Then why not permit the characters on screen to smoke?
And if these kids are exposed to actors smoking, then they're exposed (literally) to all the rest. This is good? He is glamorizing more than smoking in his screenplays.
Keep in mind that is already illegal for "a 12-or 14-year-old" to puchase cigarettes. It is not as though society condones smoking by this group -- it's not kids smoking on the screen. How much clearer can the message be? Smoking is legal for adults only.
Forget about having to prove/justify that not all cartoons/comics are for kids, the language used by the left to frame the argument is clearly designed to weaken any counter arguments.
I've seen an anti-smoking documentary that showed some clips from old cigarette ads but didn't place them in context. Through countless reruns, The Flintstones became a daytime cartoon rerun but originally it was a prime time broadcast sponsored by Winston Cigarettes. I've seen one of the Flintstones Winston Cigarettes ads. There were also Flintstones ads for One A Day Vitamins. There was even an industrial sales pitch film (20-30 minutes) for a brewery hosted by Fred Flinstone (never intended for a young audience). Mr. Magoo did ads for Stag Beer. Many ads in the 1950s and 1960s were animated. It doesn't mean that the intended audience was kids.
Yeah, it is hard to take it from Hollywood when they say that cigarettes in movies inspire impressionable young minds (and that studios court commercial businesses to pay for product placement in movies to improve their sales) and yet any talk of harming society with violence, foul language, promiscuous sex, aberant sex, etc. has no impact on the audience.
But Old Joe now thinks that folks should not be given the freedom to make bad decisions. Young Joe made bad decisions; Old Joe must live and die with them. Thats freedom baby!
Serious contradiction in these two sentences.
Of course being from hollyweird this guy probably supports murdering unborn babies and the democrat party too
God Save America (Please)
Many people in Hollywood (onscreen and behind the scenes) have died of AIDS but I haven't heard of an outcry from Hollywood to close bath houses (where public sex occurs) or end promiscuity.
Same old nonsense from you, we don't subscribe to this, but if the nannies are going to say it makes kids smoke, then I say ban all movies, just look at all the rape, murder, war and what have you....... who knows if we didn't have movies, we may have a placid peaceful world, Stepford wives comes to mind again.
![]() |
Fri Aug 9,10:36 AM ET |
Screenwriter Joe Eszterhas, is shown in this September 21, 1995 file photo in Los Angeles. Eszterhas, best known for 1992's "Basic Instinct" script, has throat cancer after a lifetime of smoking, and is urging Hollywood to stop glamorizing cigarette use the way he says he did. (AP Photo/Michael Caulfield, file) |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.