HOW CONSERVATIVE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?

The Cato Institute ^ | August 3, 2002 | By Veronique de Rugy

[Uncle Bill]

How Conservative Is President Bush?

The Cato Institute
By Veronique de Rugy
August 3, 2002
Source

Veronique de Rugy is a fiscal policy analyst at the Cato Institute.

President Bush may be repeating the sins of his father. Although elected on a Reaganesque, tax-cutting platform, the White House has veered to the left. President Bush has signed a bill to regulate political speech, issued protectionist taxes on imported steel and lumber, backed big-spending education and farm bills, and endorsed massive new entitlements for mental health care and prescription drugs. When the numbers are added up, in fact, it looks like President Bush is less conservative than President Clinton.

It makes little sense to discourage one's core supporters prior to a mid-term election. Yet that is the result when a Republican president expands government, which Bush is doing. Also, academic research on voting patterns shows that a president is most likely to get re-elected if voters are enjoying an increase in disposable income. Yet making government bigger is not a recipe for economic growth. After all, there is a reason why Hong Kong grows so fast and France is an economic basket case. But you can't tell that to the Bush administration.

Administration officials privately admit that much of the legislation moving through Congress represents bad public policy. Yet they argue either that everything must take a back seat to the war on terror (much as the first Bush administration treated the war against Iraq) or that compromises are necessary to neutralize issues such as education. But motives and rationalizations do not repeal the laws of economics.

In less than two years, President Bush has presided over more government expansion than took place during eight years of Bill Clinton. For instance:

• The education bill expands federal involvement in education. The administration originally argued that the new spending was a necessary price to get vouchers and other reforms. Yet the final bill boosted spending and was stripped of almost all reform initiatives. And there is every reason to believe that this new spending will be counter-productive, like most other federal money spent on education in the past 40 years. Children and taxpayers are the big losers.

• The farm bill is best characterized as a bipartisan orgy of special interest politics. Making a mockery of the Freedom to Farm Act, the new legislation boosts farm spending to record levels. Old subsidies have been increased and new subsidies created. Perhaps worst of all, the administration no longer has the moral credibility to pressure the European Union to reform its socialized agricultural policies. Taxpayers and consumers are the big losers.

• The protectionist decisions on steel and lumber imports make free traders wish Bill Clinton were still president. These restrictions on world commerce have undermined the productivity of U.S. manufacturers by boosting input prices and creating massive ill will in the international community. American products already have been targeted for reciprocal treatment. Consumers and manufacturers are the big losers.

• The campaign finance law is an effort to protect the interests of incumbent politicians by limiting free speech rights during elections. The administration openly acknowledged that the legislation is unconstitutional, yet was unwilling to make a principled argument for the Bill of Rights and fair elections. Voters and the Constitution are the big losers.

• New health care entitlements are akin to throwing gasoline on a fire. Medicare and Medicaid already are consuming enormous resources, and the burden of these programs will become even larger when the baby boom generation retires. Adding a new prescription drug benefit will probably boost spending by $1 trillion over 10 years. A mandate for mental health coverage will drive up medical costs, making insurance too expensive for many more families.

Those policy decisions make government bigger and more expensive. They also slow the economy and hurt financial markets -- read the headlines lately? For all his flaws, President Clinton's major policy mistake was the 1993 tax increase. Other changes, such as the welfare reform bill, NAFTA, GATT, farm deregulation, telecommunications deregulation, and financial services deregulation, moved policy in a market-oriented direction.

Perhaps most importantly, there was a substantial reduction in federal spending as a share of gross domestic product during the Clinton years. Using the growth of domestic spending as a benchmark, Clinton was the second most conservative president of the post-World War II era, trailing only Ronald Reagan.

To be sure, much of the credit for Clinton's good policy probably belongs to the Republican Congress, but that is not an excuse for bad policy today. And on one positive note, President Bush has "promised" to fight for partial privatization of Social Security. Yet, so far, President Bush has not vetoed a single piece of legislation. Needless to say, this means it will be rather difficult to blame "big-spending" Democrats if the economy continues to sputter.

---

Compassionate Conservatism Means Big Government

No To 'Compassionate Conservatism'
"Marvin Olasky, the former Marxist journalism professor who coined the term. But he and George W. Bush are barking up the wrong tree if they think "compassionate conservatism" is going to rally popular support necessary to effect the real change needed to turn this country around."

President Highlights Compassionate Conservative Agenda for Inner Cities

---

If You Want Increasing Huge Government, Vote Bush

BUSH SPENDING BILL LARGEST EVER

U.S. quietly OKs fetal stem cell work - Bush allows funding despite federal limits on embryo use

Bush Signs Largest Family Planning Bill In U.S. History

Un El día En El la vida de Jorge W. La arbusto

OPEN BORDERS

Bush's 'open door' slammed

"I told the Congress that I want to make sure that the Mexican citizen here is well-respected," Bush said. "And one way to do that is to pass 245I."

CFR - "I Believe In Free Speech"

Meanwhile, Back On The Farm

Bush Urges Congress To Deliver on Prescription Drugs For Medicare

• AARP Likes Bush's Prescription Drug Plan

GOP Medicare Prescription Drug Plan Advances in House - Another Trillion Dollars

Pig Book - 2002

Orgy At Federal Trough

Bush and House Republicans Push Legislation For Full Drug Subsidies For Low-Income Elderly

Bush Prepares 'Big-Time' Response To African Famine

Government Spending - War Against The Stock Market

Bush signs debt-limit increase

Bush Pushes Minority Homeownership

Bush's Food Stamp Plan Called Ethnic Pandering

Bush Wants Food Stamps For Non-Citizens

Worse Than Drunken Sailors!

Senate Clears Way For Trade Bill - More Spending

BUSH AND THE BIG GOVERNMENT GOP

Security Bill Loaded With Wasteful PORK

Senate Ok's $31.5 Billion Anti-Terror Bill Loaded With Pork

How Bad Can Things Get?

George W. Bush and Gun Control

Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government

Bush Backs Down From Immunity Demand - Caves Again

Bush administration has been "as bad, if not worse" than the Clinton administration when it comes to the transfer of sensitive technologies to the People's Republic of China

BUSH, G7 to pay $20 billion to get rid of Russian nuke stockpiles

George W. Bush - The Global Warming Sell-Out

• George W. Bush Told Americans Before Elected That He Was A Global Warming Wacko

• Conservatives Angered by Environmental Provision [Bush pulls another Al Gore]

Dubya's New Deal - The New FDR

• Roosevelt -- Man Of The Century?

Bush Won't Label Arafat A Terrorist

George W. Bush's Terrorist Buddy

"When peoplelose faith in their institutions they trust to enforce the law, justice is no longer possible."

Bush Caves On Airport Screeners

Bush's Latest Srategic Mistake

BUSH: NINE FORMER PRESIDENTS WRONG; CLINTON RIGHT!

CRISIS? WHAT CRISIS? GEORGE BUSH'S NEVER-ENDING DOMESTIC BUDGET BUILD-UP - Father Like Son

Bush Appoints Four More Homosexuals

Dr. James Dobson Criticizes Bush Appointment to the CDC

Bush Pushes $500 Million HIV/Aids Funding For Africa

Bush to Propose Another $100 Million Over Five Years for Education in Africa

Are You Fat? No Problem, George W. Bush Will Help

House Conservatives Budge on Arts Spending

Bush Cheers Government Support For Art

Bush to Name Justice Dept. BUILDING After Kennedy

GOP Right In Iowa Fear Purge

GOP Leaders Spurn Right in Key Races

Laura Ingraham's analysis of yet another Bush betrayal

Bush decisions rankle conservatives

BUSH PROPOSES LARGEST EXPANSION OF GOVERNMENT SINCE TRUMAN

Bush's Record Calls into Question His Conservative Label

Conservatives Question Dubya's Direction

Conservatives not satisfied with Bush's record

Bush, Ashcroft Run Roughshod Over Bill Of Rights, Study Says

Republicans: Big Government Addicts

A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters

Are Republicans losing their constituency?

Ann Coulter: BUSH PAYS HOMAGE TO THE FETISHISTIC RITUALS OF LIBERALISM

Compassionate conservatism is about socialism, not Americanism

Bush is jettisoning his principles for what?

Bush: stop the runaway federal spending and regulating!

Mark Levin Hammers Bushbots

Was Clinton More Conservative Than Bush? - Fox News

Bush: A Democrat in Republican clothing?

Bush continues Clinton Agenda

GEORGE W. BUSH: CLINTON'S THIRD TERM ©

---

Bush's Court Jester

---

"Another way to make sure that we foster growth and restore confidence is to hold people accountable for misdeeds in the public sector."
George W. Bush - University of Alabama at Birmingham Alys Stephens Center - July 15, 2002.

NOTE: Do As I Say, Not As I Do.

---

A Bush administration insider has privately leaked word that a deal was struck between Democratic congressional leaders and the Bush White House not to prosecute Bill and/or Hillary Clinton

Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis

Bush and Ashcroft Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers.

Bill Clinton broke the law and the Republicans let him off the hook.

What we need is the tough Newt Gingrich back.

"As far back as April 7, 1998, then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich was asked on NBC’s Today if he were going to press for impeachment. His response: "No, we don’t have any evidence."
Source.

Al Gore Broke The Law and the Republicans let him off the hook.

"I don’t care if you have proof that he raped a woman, stood up and shot her dead, you’re still not going to get 67 votes."

Bush Says He Wants to Let Clinton 'Move On'
"Listen, here's my view: I think it's time to get all of this business behind us. I think it's time ... to allow the president to finish his term, and let him move on and enjoy life and become an active participant in the American system. And I think we've had enough focus on the past. It's time to move forward." - George W. Bush.

Bush Won't Dwell On Clinton Affair, "We're Moving Forward"
"B/S, Mr Bush. Clinton is a criminal and a traitor. We demand a thorough investigation and prosecution. Our Republic is dead and our liberty is at stake if the next administration does not clean up this mess for now and forever more. Corrupt politicians must pay the price for subverting our Constitution and using their offices for personal gain."
4 Posted on 01/20/2000 14:17:56 PST by Jim Robinson

---

A Republic If We Can Keep It - Bush Trashing The Constitution

It's About The Republic, Not The Republican

How Big Is The Government's Debt? - $33.1 TRILLION

There Must Be Some Way Out Of Here

---

"Not over my dead body will they raise your taxes,"
George W. Bush - SOURCE.

[Satadru]

I am sorry, you threatened that you want to cut someone's head off. Even in Clinton's vocabulary, that is a threat for murder.

[terilyn]

How's this one? Not very original, but it rhymes and I'm sure you'll be able to comprehend it with that fine third-grade education you claim to have.

I'm rubber, you're glue.
Whatever you say bounces off me, and sticks to you!

Gosh, you and Jethro Bodine must have been classmates no?
He made it through the sixth grade anyway.

[sleavelessinseattle]

I will think about doing that but I doubt I will, because I find abuse to be unpleasant the first time I have to read it. You were very direct and effective about showing the prohibited exposure that howlin experienced and I applaud you for that...full stop...But that issue was resolved to my satisfaction when Twodees pointed out that he didn't even approve of reg's action in the FIRST PLACE!!!...I have no problem with you other than that Your input combined with a bunch of hecklers would make a thin skinned person pretty hesitant to jump in the pool...And as you kept saying about your experience over and over again(Regarding the deleted thread)..."I WAS THERE!!!" Well I WAS there, last night, too...You were not an objective bystander last night so I'm not going to let you turn this into you being the "reasonable" one.

My issue is still unsatisfactorily resolved. So HERE I AM...Dubya is a human being being pulled in a million directions and under that pressure...analysis of every decision he makes is perfectly justifiable. I want to feel like someone who doesn't KNOW he's safe from TF can still put ten good comments in on what the POTUS is doing without being called a homosexual or a twit or whatever strikes TF's Fancy at the moment. Being told to Butt out also qualifies as abuse coming from someone with a verifiable history of menacing...did you miss that?

[Texasforever]

am sorry, you threatened that you want to cut someone's head off. Even in Clinton's vocabulary, that is a threat for murder.

Fine.

[nopardons]

It's a shame, that you were never taught that if you didn't say something silly / foolish / stupid, others could only assume that you were silly / foolish / stupid ; not be assured of it. LOL

[terilyn]

LOL!

"...you came to this duel of wits, unarmed"

Keyboards at 20 paces?

I can type 80 wpm. Anybody want to make a wager?

[terilyn]

Do you need a hankie too? Or maybe a bandage? I guess I've been left in charge of the infirmary ;)

[nopardons]

Your " intellectual heft " and " academic background " ? You've got to be kidding ! You're still in school , young, and appear to be delusional to boot.

[Satadru]

I tell ya' it just makes a girl's head spin.

You aint seen nothing yet. If you are frustrated in more than one department, this compassionate conservative will provide free services. I am not so insecure that I will proclaim myself to be a "real conservative." My point is that Bush aint one. All your ilk tries to prove that he is the greatest conservative ever, he has and will never make any mistakes, and he is a Saint if not God himself. All I am saying is that I do not believe those claims.

[Texasforever]

I want to feel like someone who doesn't KNOW he's safe from TF can still put ten good comments in on what the POTUS is doing without being called a homosexual or a twit or whatever strikes TF's Fancy at the moment.

There is an abuse function somewhere. Either push it or shut the hell up.

[nopardons]

WOW , you can type fast, as well as post trenchently. BRAVA ! :-)

[Texasforever]

How about telling me why you post these links. Do you agree with them. If so then who should Bush be replaced with. You OBVIOUSLY have the answer.

[nopardons]

Not ONE of us here, who are Bush supporters, have EVER claikmed that he is " the second coming ", " The greatest Conservative ever ", " a Saint or GOD himself ", nor any of the other smears, which you and your ilk delight in stating as factual. Those are YOUR words.

Where is that " intellectual heft "; where has it gone to ? LOL

[Texasforever]

All your ilk tries to prove that he is the greatest conservative ever, he has and will never make any mistakes, and he is a Saint if not God himself.

I have a 100 bucks that you will not find a post to back that up.

[Satadru]

I am trying to size up your intellectual heft. You call names to people who disagree with you, you make up stories to make yourself feel better, you distort "facts" to make your man a philosopher king (look up the reference), and finally you are a Bushiban. That is the true CV of a learned man. BTW, ill-mannered is a hyphenated word.

Why don't you stay up all night fuming? I take pleasure knowing that you are breathing through your ears and frothing in your mouth. Have a good night!

[Satadru]

Tssk tssk. Have you not gotten to hyperbole yet in your 4th grade class? See you have so much to learn. Since you will be up all night tearing your hair, why don't you look it up in your grammar book?

[sleavelessinseattle]

After reading some of the posts by sleeveless on a forum swwearch........I think he could help you out with some cristals and stuff.

Well so much for your being a white hatter...I'd let you off the hook if you had tried to put my handle in the to: box Sleaveless is the name...use it again without notifying me and I'll do the abuse thingy for the first time ever...Glad you found a home in Hypocrit land. and Spell Check! Sheesh!

[nopardons]

Their is a perfectly good word, for what you have just exposed yourself to suffer with. It's called projection and a good psychiatrist might be able to help you with that and your other, oh so obvious mental problems. Do seek help. There must be someone , in Chicago, who would consider taking on your case.

I just bet, that you are " taking pleasure " in your assumptions; however, kid, you would,, as usual, be utterly and completely incorrect. I am about as far from " fuming", as one can get. I'm actually laughing my socks off at you and your delusions of granduer, abject inability to write a cogent refutation, and your childish stabs at wit and insult.

You know that I am NOT a " man " ; however, your great " intellectual heft " seems to have withered and you have forgotten that.

[sleavelessinseattle]

shut the hell up.

In a word...No...

I'm not asking you to shut up either...just realize that you're spoiling a really neat invention by being an egomaniac. And I'll keep reminding you, too. What are you going to do about it?

[terilyn]

No, I didn't miss any of it, and I never claimed to be an innocent bystander. Nor did I resort to name calling. Twodees highjacked UB's thread, (which he later admitted to and apologized for). I saw the initial exchange and attempted to refute his lies with facts.

Twodees claimed if Reg did it, he shouldn't have, but never would admit that he actually did, therefore it wasn't wrong. Even after Reg reposted all the info over at LF. Later he claimed I made the whole thing up. He ended the conversation by telling me I was dilusional and imagining things.

I'm confused. Why is ok for someone to call people a drunk, boy, dilusional, (and those were the nice things), but it's not ok for somebody else to post facts, links, and truth to rebut the name calling and lies?

The blindness by some is simply astonishing. When they do it they're defending themselves. When somebody else does it back, it's an attack. When reading this statement, keep in mind that Twodees, by his own admission, started this last night.

pot...kettle and all that.