Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Backs Down From Immunity Demand
abc ^ | 7/10/02

Posted on 07/10/2002 7:58:44 PM PDT by knak

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-199 next last
To: browardchad
A great incentive for the men and women of our armed forces

When I was in Kosovo we were told by the legal types that we were subject to an international court. They went over various scenarios of the ROE and it was a real eye opener. "The US is not at War"; yeah OK. I've got an M60 and I'm wearing funny clothes in a foreign country and people are shooting at us. We may not be "at" war but I sure as hell am in one. We were told, for just one example, that we could only shoot at snipers if we could see and identify them as an enemy combatant. I pointed out that by definition, a sniper can't be seen. Sure, they were only trying to "protect" us with this advice, but the whole thing is a CROCK.

What we need is leaders with Balls. It's one thing to give your life for your country, but entirely another to go in with both hands tied behind your back in the middle of a civil war.

81 posted on 07/10/2002 10:05:56 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knak
Were gonna have this shoved down our throats when we should be shoving it up the U.N'S ...A%^&# .....I pray to god every day the un self impodes and every day the powers that be get freindlier with it

So at what point do we set down the bible and pick up the sword?

82 posted on 07/10/2002 10:07:36 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
Dont get me wrong... I hope we can't come to an agreement and our troops come home. But unfortunately we do not live in a perfect world. With the threats we face from terrorism we must rely on our allies to work with us in denying these terrorist groups safe places to operate. This is why we are having to work with many of the countries who have signed on to the ICC and it's intrusive nature. Europeans see the ICC much like we see a merger between big U.S. companies. We see it as a direct threat to our Soveriegnty and justifiably so.

Thank God we don't have Al Gore in office becuase he would be lobbying Congress to sign on to this Kangaroo Court

83 posted on 07/10/2002 10:11:15 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
We have withdrawn our signature from this ICC treaty, Therefore congress will never get the chance to vote on it. The debate is over immunity... Period

Did you read my post? I know that!! Also, this story is from AP actually. I found it on the ABC sight.

84 posted on 07/10/2002 10:12:27 PM PDT by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
I agree with you.
85 posted on 07/10/2002 10:12:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: knak
Where are all the pollyannas who were blasting me a few days ago when I said Bush was caving on this? No no no, he wasn't caving; the other side was caving. Yessiree. Bush is weak and he will be a one-termer for it. I shudder to think at what will slither into the White House next because Bush doesn't have the strength to hold on to the job.

MM

86 posted on 07/10/2002 10:13:30 PM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
First of all I just got in from a dinner to honor Tom DeLay and Mitch McConnell for their efforts on CFR. This ICC is all but doomed because behind it all Russia and China are not backing this thing and I bet most of this report is bogus. Remember last time I checked a map Russia was part of Europe/Asia and China was in Asia. Did we not fall for this trick the first time around and President Bush came out and said it ain't going to happen?! Remember these news reports are someone else's opinon on a subject. I would rather play wait and see than pile on enlight of an ABC Report.
87 posted on 07/10/2002 10:16:58 PM PDT by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
"Jagdish Koonjul"

Are Americans ready to submit to the NWO goon show trials ? Absolutely revolting.

88 posted on 07/10/2002 10:17:04 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knak
AP,ABC,CBS,Rueters,Drudge,NBC,CNN,MSNBC,DU, Maureen Dowd ... What's the difference?
89 posted on 07/10/2002 10:17:17 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: knak
sight = site. Woops
90 posted on 07/10/2002 10:17:18 PM PDT by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Trueblackman
Thanks Kevin, Always good to read your posts
91 posted on 07/10/2002 10:18:52 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Thanks for the kind words.
92 posted on 07/10/2002 10:20:31 PM PDT by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Well, I said I'd give this the benefit of doubt and I will. We shall wait and see if the new year long exemption proposal works out, I guess. Or if we have to give in any more.
93 posted on 07/10/2002 10:23:15 PM PDT by knak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: knak
What the hell is this?

This stinks!


Was all the US "resolve" just a bad played poker game?

Here is some free advice.

"Don't talk tough and then cave early---they will never believe you again."

94 posted on 07/10/2002 10:23:53 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
is there nothing that mr. bush doesn't cave on?

he's a globablist.
95 posted on 07/10/2002 10:27:19 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Abundy; adversarial; agrandis; Alabama_Wild_Man; Alan Chapman; A Navy Vet; Arleigh; ATOMIC_PUNK; ...
fyi...
96 posted on 07/10/2002 10:31:23 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Well I will say this I am not going to fall for half-truths from the left-wing press that seek to split the base and hand the Congress(House)back to Democrats. This deal if it exist has been around for awhile and someone leaked it to the press. I mean come on all the other stuff that has been leaked as of late, this fits the Liberal MO.
97 posted on 07/10/2002 10:35:35 PM PDT by Trueblackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: knak
I salute you, I just wish our friends here would consider the source when they read these deceptive ads. Look for many more of these ads by the left as they try to divide conservatives and play on their most sacred issues. The socialist over at the NYT's are professionals at stirring the most conservative among us by playing on our emotions.

When we see articles like this, that do their very best to claim Bush is ignoring our troops, do yourself a favor and email as many of our troops you can and ask them about the changes they see happening, ask them about their pay, and most of all ask them if they trust their Commander-in-Chief. What we are seeing is election year politics that is aimed at trashing the President at every opportunity they get. The left has no agenda, they have no issues to run on, their only avenue is unwarranted attacks that are based on pure lies and speculation. PERIOD

98 posted on 07/10/2002 10:36:11 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Trueblackman
I like the way you think.
99 posted on 07/10/2002 10:38:07 PM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: knak; fogarty
It took me a while to find this, but I wanted to admit that I was wrong, and fogarty was right.
To: Bandolier

You forgot the third option:

3. The UN refuses to back down and the US compromises, allowing for some watered-down form of protection for US armed forces overseas.

118 posted on 6/20/02 1:16 PM Central by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

100 posted on 07/10/2002 10:44:00 PM PDT by Bandolier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-199 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson