[TomGuy]

Just think, some reporter had to stay up nites, working overtime, to dig up that piece of dirt.

It almost restores my faith in investigative journalism, to think one could find a 12-year-old stock sale to question.

Now, if this journalist would try using his/her talent in current events, s/he might really find a story. [Although there is significant danger in that--it might uncover too much of a story. Gotta be careful, tread softly, don't want to find the wrong flavor of dirt, now, do s/he.]

[chiefqc]

How many years will it take to rid this great country of the smell and perversion of the klintons perverted presidency?

And still the Dumb-O-Crats continue to defend him.

Unbeliveable, just fuc*ing unbeliveable.

[grania]

Just think, some reporter had to stay up nites, working overtime, to dig up that piece of dirt.

Business dealings by both GWB and VP Cheney were pretty well publicized throughout the campaign, but most people didn't bother trying to understand it and it wasn't an issue when the economy was strong, just as no one got overly upset about some of Hillary's deals.

Times they are a-changin'. I can't imagine that GWB operated outside the law or accepted practices.

[Wphile]

Just think, some reporter had to stay up nites, working overtime, to dig up that piece of dirt.

You've got to be kidding, right? This story is as old as the hills. It was brought up in 1988, in 1994, in 1998, and again in 2000. It's a retread. I read yesterday that some WP reporter said the Dems are not going to let this go and will use it up until the election in November. My question to the reporter is, "well, maybe the Dems won't let it go, but does that mean the press has to follow along with the Dems?" Okay, silly me, that's a really dumb question.

I hate the press.