Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
I will not be contributing or volunteering for Bush in 2004, and unless he repeals the reauthorization for the Assault Weapons ban, will not be voting for him.

Thanks for being a one issue Pro Gore Pro Kerry Pro Hillary supporter. Witholding a vote for Bush means one less vote the Democratic candidate will need.

84 posted on 06/18/2002 10:50:05 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: finnman69
Witholding a vote for Bush means one less vote the Democratic candidate will need.

My vote is not guarenteed. My vote is earned.

Tell your guy to start acting like a compassionate CONSERVATIVE and he might earn my vote.

86 posted on 06/18/2002 10:52:04 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: finnman69
Witholding a vote for Bush means one less vote the Democratic candidate will need.

Aside from withholding support, what other leverage does a conservative voter have with the RNC?

93 posted on 06/18/2002 10:56:45 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: finnman69
Witholding a vote for Bush means one less vote the Democratic candidate will need.

He should consider that before he betrays us. Gun control is my #1 issue. If you are for it in any way you are my political enemy and I will not vote for you regardless of your positions on other issues.

103 posted on 06/18/2002 11:02:24 AM PDT by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: finnman69
Witholding a vote for Bush means one less vote the Democratic candidate will need.

He should consider that before he betrays us. Gun control is my #1 issue. If you are for it in any way you are my political enemy and I will not vote for you regardless of your positions on other issues.

104 posted on 06/18/2002 11:02:37 AM PDT by elmer fudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: finnman69;Lazamataz
Nope, Laz is right, and must be, because right now, I think we would probably be better off with a conservative Democrat in the White House.

As sickening as the thought is, Evan Bayh would never have done all the FDR stuff that Bush has. I am not exaggerating.

What bums me out most about Bush is how much he COULD have done in the wake of September 11.

Let me review: New Yorkers beating the drums for war.

Hillary being booed.

Democrat Senators totally emasculated. In the words of Daschle, "let no light and no room come between Bush and us."

Polls at ninety percent.

People ready to consider immigration reform. (Will they ever do so again?)

The American Jewish vote, usually 90 percent pro-Rat, every single election, without fail. Bush had attracted their attention.

Imagine if only Bush had come out unequivocally in favor of the Israelis kicking the pals out. Imagine the American Jewish vote being majority GOP for the foreseeable future.

He instead had to have the fat-assed girl arab princes over to the Double Wide Ranch. What a fool.

It all would have been great, and Bush could have gained favor with so many other constituencies as well,

But moreover, he could have REALLY advanced the conservative agenda.

He could have made the conservative cause palatable and understandable to SO MANY liberals who would have listened, in the wake of September 11.

But he TOTALLY BLEW IT.

And he is going so far left now, there is just nothing to explain it.

131 posted on 06/18/2002 11:11:09 AM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson