Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters
Toogood Reports ^ | June 5, 2002 | Lee R. Shelton IV

Posted on 06/05/2002 1:20:54 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Let me just say up front that I am not addressing you if you voted for George W. Bush in 2000 and regret it. The same goes for those of you who voted for Bush and insist on holding his feet to the fire on the important issues. If, however, you cast your vote for Bush, still believe he is the only hope for America and intend to support every move he makes without so much as a raised eyebrow, this is for you.

It has been nearly a year-and-a-half since George W. Bush, the savior of conservatism, descended from on high to begin his earthly reign in Washington, D.C. Republicans assured us that he would restore integrity to the White House and would be a marked improvement over the promiscuous Bill Clinton. Well, in all honesty, that could have been accomplished by electing a neutered chimp to the office of president.

During the 2000 presidential campaign, George W. Bush the man proved to be a nice break from Bill Clinton and Al Gore. Unlike Gore, Bush had a more likable...well, he actually had a personality. He also possessed the unique ability to address the American people without the smug and condescending vibe Clinton exuded. However, when it came to policy, George W. Bush the candidate failed to demonstrate that he would govern any differently than his Democrat counterparts.

Still, throughout the campaign, there was a loyal group of Bush supporters who would take offense at even the slightest implication that their candidate was anything but a staunch conservative. Even now, they continue to stand by their man, and I find this to be rather perplexing.

Perhaps those who have pledged their undying allegiance to President Bush could answer a few questions for me, in no particular order of course:

•  How would you have reacted if Bill Clinton had signed the Patriot Act into law and given the government sweeping new surveillance powers?

•  Would you have criticized a Democrat president for signing a $26 billion education-spending bill?

•  Did you feel betrayed when Bush signed Campaign Finance Reform into law?

•  What do you think about Bush's position on granting amnesty to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants?

•  Would you have tolerated a Democrat proposal for federally funded faith-based initiatives?

•  What would your reaction have been if a Democrat had said, "No one should have to pay more than a third of their income to the federal government"?

•  What do you think about the president's granting of Permanent Most Favored Nation status to China?

•  What's the difference between Bush and the Democrats on the issue of farm subsidies?

•  How would you react if a Democrat president sent a $2.13 trillion budget to Congress?

•  Would you have stood for a Democrat saying "No!" to arming airline pilots?

•  What would your reaction have been if a Democrat had pushed for the federalization of airport security?

•  Are you willing to stand by and let the Bush administration cater to the environmentalists on the global warming issue?

•  What do you think about Bush's call for a Patient's Bill of Rights?

•  What one thing has Bush done that sets him apart from the Democrats?

•  It's been a year-and-a-half since Bush took office. When do we start to see a decrease in the size and scope of government? For that matter, when do we start to see even a remote indication that this administration will think about doing anything to try to limit the federal government?

This list is by no means exhaustive, but I would really be interested in some answers. Perhaps it would help shed some light on the mindset of modern compassionate conservatives.

The fact that a Republican president is governing like a Democrat isn't surprising. What's amazing to me is that there are a few select Bush supporters out there who cannot—or will not—utter one word of criticism against their president for any reason. In their minds this man is the epitome of conservatism, and to question his actions would be to question their own beliefs and cause them to wonder why they supported him in the first place.

The way I see it there can only be two explanations for this: 1) these people really and truly believe in what Bush is doing, or 2) they do not wish to face up to the real reason they voted for him — he was simply a slightly more palatable choice than Al Gore.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,301-1,302 next last
To: ArneFufkin
"Where's Abe Lincoln in this mix?"

Wondering how the play ended?

561 posted on 06/05/2002 8:05:23 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
The only way Bush will be in that position is if we have 60 "conservative" senators in order to kill a filibuster (sp?). Anything less and all we have is control of committees (granted, that's alot better than we got now).
562 posted on 06/05/2002 8:05:24 PM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Something is going on here with the Nazi talk -- concerned about politics told me Heil Hitler the other day when he didn't like what I had to say! What gives?
563 posted on 06/05/2002 8:05:31 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Someone who was previously banned and comes back again (and again and again and again).
564 posted on 06/05/2002 8:05:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Ha! Well, I don't know about that, but I do agree with your statements above. The only chance we have of turning this thing around is to regain control of the Senate. Keep voting out the Democrats, regain contriol, and then we can worry about the RINOs.
565 posted on 06/05/2002 8:06:56 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
Ah, I figured so much. Thanks for the clarification.
566 posted on 06/05/2002 8:07:24 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: oldvike
Here and Here Then if you don't get what you need begin the process of getting rid of him or whatever else suits your fancy.
567 posted on 06/05/2002 8:08:46 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
It ended with a bang.
568 posted on 06/05/2002 8:09:06 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Keep voting out the Democrats, regain contriol, and then we can worry about the RINOs.

Exactly right...that's the best strategy.

569 posted on 06/05/2002 8:09:21 PM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Can I quote you on that, Jim?
570 posted on 06/05/2002 8:09:29 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
We should all concentrate on getting control of both the House & Senate

Right-on! This election in November is one of the most important ones we have had in a long time -- there will be NO conservative justices until we TAKE BACK THE SENATE! That's a given!

571 posted on 06/05/2002 8:10:08 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
Many of us have been saying for a while now that winning back the Senate is KEY to getting the correct agenda for America on track.
572 posted on 06/05/2002 8:10:58 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Credit rintense. We might as well mock ourselves!
573 posted on 06/05/2002 8:12:21 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

Just curious - why is a person automatically called a "Bush basher" for simply not questioning him? People get so emotional over fellow consevatives on this issue - criticizing. It's really disturbing. I finally had to leave delete another message board from my bookmarks over this. I finally registered here because there is some sanity. It seems you can actually be a conservative and not be a "Bushbot". Anyway, I like the original post and the debate so far.
574 posted on 06/05/2002 8:12:23 PM PDT by oline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Am I quotable?
575 posted on 06/05/2002 8:12:46 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
Bring on the gridlock!
576 posted on 06/05/2002 8:13:52 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Actually, I have heard Joe Biden say that him and Warren Rudman celebrated the fact Bush is nominating a pro-abortion justice right after Brennan retired. A little known fact is that Reagan also considered nominating Souter, but didn't because he didn't feel he was conservative enough. What a foresight!! Also, Souter was in the 1st circuit US Court of Appeals for only three months before he was nominated. Bush knew that if people found out that he wasn't a conservative, he would have an aweful time trying to nominate him to the Supreme Court. That is why he hurried. Plus, the fact that Bush Sr was in love with Rudman helped matters for Souter anyways. The fact that Souter was a right hand man of Warren Rudman says a lot about how he thinks about things. Every Republican knew it but went along anyways because they feared that otherwise Bush would have to take a lot of flack from Congress if he sent another Thomas.

But, it is a mute point, because Bush Jr will not be sending conservative justices to the Senate. They will be handpicked to court the Hispanic vote. The solid conservative justices in this country are the likes of Luttig, Posner, Easterbrook, et. al. I can bet with you right now, they won't be nominated, nor anyone who closely resembles them. Bush will handpick judges who gives him the most leverage. At the end of the day, Bush does not care if Republicans can win the Senate. Bush wants to accomplish what his dad couldn't - win a second term. That is his goal from day 1. Honestly, so far he has appeased so many groups on the left, that I think Dems would do what they did to Warner in VA - not run an opponent, because there is no point. Their agenda is getting promoted anyways. They might just keep their good candidates until 2008.

577 posted on 06/05/2002 8:14:14 PM PDT by Satadru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You don't have a name that can be easily converted ... "AdolfFufkin" LOL!

I was named that because I contended that two police officers didn't deserve to be ambush shotgunned to death, even if they did use the landlady/perp mother's key to open the killer's screen door and commit a 4th Amendment violation.

The 4th Amendment violation took precidence over the dual LEO murders in some people's mind. Doesn't take much to be a Nazi these days ... now I know how John Banner and Werner Klemperer got their gigs.

578 posted on 06/05/2002 8:14:16 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I joined freerepublic because I thought I would be with like minded people...I don't expect us to always agree but this bashing of our President lately has gotten out of hand. I didn't realize that we had so many control freaks and the sad part is...some of them are makeing charges that are untrue and some are using plain old heresay as fact. A house divided against itself cannot stand. I would think that everyone would be concentrating on the matters at hand like the war on terror. There is absolutely no excuse for their disruptive behavior...maybe they need attention???
579 posted on 06/05/2002 8:15:01 PM PDT by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Yep. Dubya does it, and now the only material the late night comedians have is to mock Democrats!
580 posted on 06/05/2002 8:15:20 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 1,301-1,302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson