Posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:46 AM PDT by hchutch
Just the headline
We need to decide if we are going to work over the long haul, or stick with the short-term. Unlike some here, I have NOT banished Rush. I think he has some valid concerns. At the same time, though, I think we need to learn from the past, and recognize that McAuliffe, Carville, and Begala and their slash-and-burn, disregard-the-truth style of politics ARE NOT GOING AWAY, and we must change our tactics and methods to take this into account.
I have defined WINNING as one of two things:
1. Getting legislation passed that will reflect my positions.
2. Creating a political climate so that we can pass legislation that reflects my positions.
Furthermore, I am not going to engage in a political frontal attack unless it means we will WIN. Quite frankly, a lot of the stuff I believe in is not exactly easy to package in the current political climate, so we need to CHANGE the political climate by re-packaging the way we sell what we believe in.
We also need to make a decision about dealing with McAuliffe-Carville-Begala politics. I think, for the most part, we can take the high road, but SOME retaliation is in order. Senator Byrd is a nice target.
I don't know what course others may take, but at this point, I'll work within the GOP to WIN as I have defined things above. In accordance with that decision, I will also have NO tolerance for those who will put those who oppose what I stand for in office by breaking off, whether they be on the right or the left. No more Donnie DiFrancescos, no more John Warners, and no more Bob Smiths will get my support. And those who DO support politicians them are, in my opinion, helping elect politicians that oppose what I stand for.
That is where I stand on this matter. As I said, I cannot help if some here think I am a sellout or a coward, but I'm laying it out on the table here and drawing my line in the sand.
I like to think that I am too, my friend. It's been difficult of late, however.
Um, Soccer Moms don't give a fig about "high character", check Billy Jeff's numbers with this demographic. It's "all about the children" for those quintessential sheep. I'm all for getting their votes, but not at the cost of principle.
many of them will vote Republican FOR THE FIRST TIME in coming elections.
We'll see. After Hillary and Jim Edwards or Lieberman get their swings in.
Because it gets them attention, which the media (and that includes Rush) crave. Just look at all the knee-jerk response you are reading here today. It gets attention, and it brings Rush's name back on FR.
I don't listen to Rush anymore, since I get no new information or humorous analysis anymore - just harping.
Rush would have done the same thing to Reagan, if he were around then. It's the nature of the beast..
This is normal and actually desirable. Let our ideals be forged in the crucible of introspection and analysis.
Furthermore, if you think we are bad, try being in the Democrat party, which is described best as 'herding cats'.
Weren't you paying attention during the campaign? Did you think he was joking when he said he was FOR some sort of campaign finance reform -- regardless of HOW it got signed -- and the worst parts of it WILL be struck down by the SC
immigration
I don't mean to trouble you, but what ABOUT immigration? Has a bill passed?
increased welfare benefits
Not to mess up your rant, but that is tied to PERFORMANCE
extending unemployment by 13 weeks
To the people whose jobs were effected by 9-11? You're right; how horrible of him!
food stamps to immigrants
You'll have to do better than that.
abandoning the Bush Doctrine
Excuse me? Exactly when did he put out a paper which included all the "Bush doctrine" rules/goals?
quitting on ANWR drilling
And you know he's quit how?
(also caving in on Florida drilling for his brotha Jeb)
That's your opinion.
signing that piece of crap farm bill
I'm with you on that until a better case can be shown to me of why he did it.
and now agreeing with the left that HUMANS are causing global warming
Where, other than the NYT, did you hear Bush say that?
NONE OF THESE ARE ADVANCING THE CONSERVATIVE AGENDA!
I don't believe that for one moment. We ARE making progress -- but it's easier to pick a few and gripe about them, huh, rather than look at the whole picture.
The "whole" picture looks better than you'd EVER admit. And much better than YOUR candidate could have done.
I wonder if the fact that most new Americans speak English as a second language, if at all.
And I have a bridge in downtown Manhattan to sell you. Goes all the way across and everything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.