Posted on 05/27/2002 12:49:19 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:29:22 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
SACRAMENTO (AP) - After vetoing workers' compensation reforms for three years, Gov. Gray Davis this year declared the legislation long overdue and signed the labor-friendly bill into law.
Why the change?
Finally, Davis said, he received a reasonable compromise after the first, second and third measures would have cost businesses and insurers too much.
(Excerpt) Read more at bayarea.com ...
How about 20 years Hard Labour in Leavenworth :-?
DUMP DAVI$
"He's a good politician---he stays bought."
Davis doesn't seem to be a "good" politician --- you can buy him (cheaply), but you can't trust him.
Where, pray tell, is this money to come from??? The state is $27 Billion in the red! This benefit increase is pasted into the system with no funding source or premium increases.
Workers' Comp is paid by employers, not the state. This doesn't cost the state of California a penny, except in its direct role as an employer. Workers' Comp premiums paid by employers to insurance companies have skyrocketed as a result of this bill, but it has no effect on California's state budget.
I know what you are saying... but the bill does not increase the premiums enough to cover the benefit increases... and the bill allows the funds to call on STATE funds for the shortfall!
You must mean the insolvency fund for bankrupt insurance companies. If any more insurance companies go broke because of higher benefits and not enough increase in premium an insolvency fund administered by the state pays the bankrupt company's claims. However the insolvency fund gets its money by assessing the remaining solvent insurance companies a percentage of all premiums. There is no state money at risk unless the insolvency fund goes broke and for some reason can't raise assessments high enough on the remaining insurers.
In that case I guess that state money might come into play, but it's a very long shot. They'd raise the assessments on employers/insurers through the roof before they bailed out the insolvency fund with taxpayers money.
Employers pay the premiums to the insurance company who is handling their workers' comp policy. The state sets the mandated pay outs, but the insurance company sets the premium rates necessary to cover them.
Thus, employers will pay for the higher pay outs. Which means, in the end, it will be the employees who end up paying -- with their jobs or lower wages. Along with the consumers, in the form of higher prices.
The only costs to the state (and the taxpayers) will be higher premiums to their workmens' comp provider -- who is, doubtless, a large Gray Davis contributor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.