Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Investigative Report: What They Knew; When They Knew It
Insight Magazine ^ | May 27, 2002 | Kenneth R. Timmerman

Posted on 05/27/2002 8:04:57 AM PDT by xsysmgr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: antivenom
Clinton -- Not adequately addressing terrorism of Osama Bin Laden after the 1993 WTC bombing, the 1993 trip to Somalia - in which our retreat after 18 deaths was perceived as weak by Bin Laden and the Islamic world -, the 1995 US barracks bombing in Saudi Arabia, the 1995 Philippine warning of terrorists hijacking planes to fly them into government buildings, the 1996 Khobar towers bombing, and the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, or the 2000 USS Cole bombing.
After each attack, President Clinton promised to bring the "cowards" to justice.
41 posted on 05/27/2002 4:45:08 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress,ALL
<snip>In November 1992, the conspirators started to prepare for an attack on the WTC. It took them more than two months to acquire the chemicals, assemble the sophisticated urea-nitrate bomb, and transport it to the designated target...

On February 26, 1993, the terrorists drove a yellow Ford Econoline rental van into the basement of the WTC and set a timer to detonate the 1,500-pound urea-nitrate bomb. The massive blast created a cavernous crater 200 feet by 100 feet wide and seven stories deep in the garage of the World Trade Center... In all, the explosion killed six people, injured more than 1,000 [1,042], and caused nearly $300 million in property damage...[3]

With any major calamity, conspiracy theories tend to emerge when key details of the case appear incomplete. A few analysts suggest that Yousef and Ajaj [another of the bombers] were either Iraqi agents or freelance terrorists employed by Iraqi intelligence to exploit Islamic militants residing in the United States, as a means of continuing the Persian Gulf War on American soil...[4] Nevertheless, the theory that the Iraqi government sent Yousef on a mission to avenge the Gulf War relies too much on circumstantial evidence to create a compelling case...

As Yousef was being flown from Pakistan to the United States to stand trial, he told Secret Service agent Brian Parr that he would have put sodium cyanide into the WTC bomb if he had had enough money...[5] </snip>

AHHHHHHHHH ding DONG people...we still have a hell of alot of missing CYANIDE in Mexico!!!!!!

This hindsight crap is GREAT to discuss and point figures over BUT are we so stupid NOT to connect the DOTS for the coming days and weeks?!? They are going to DO IT AGAIN!

Want to read more of the I added above..go here: http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/reports/wtc93.htm

42 posted on 05/27/2002 4:49:16 PM PDT by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Did you hear about the notebook found in Afghanistan with a page entitled "Explosiva za Oklahomu" (Serbocroatian for "Explosive Used in Oklahoma,) followed by chemical formulas?

"Bojinka" in "Project Bojinka" means "big explosion" in Serbocroatian.

43 posted on 05/27/2002 4:58:48 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
I just ran a search that led to old links to weird stuff- here:

-Link--

I'll go fetch the relevant ones:

Secret Gulf War Syndrome Documents Destroyed In Oklahoma City Blast [Free Republic]

Witnesses, Israelis & Congressional Officials Say Middle Eastern Men Particpated In OKC Bombing? [Free Republic]

SECRET FILES EVEN CONGRESS DOESN'T WANT YOU TO READ...ALL THE PRESIDENT'S WOMEN [Free Republic]

Schippers: Clinton Witnesses Were Intimidated with Physical Threats [Free Republic]

44 posted on 05/27/2002 5:06:24 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: BlackVeil
"...what do you think of this?"

Personally, I think we may have been at war for the past ten years...and didn't know it.

45 posted on 05/27/2002 5:12:31 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
That is a good question.

I have two more also.

Why did it take a month to swear Mueller in as FBI Director after he had been confirmed?

Why is the excuse used ..."Mueller had only been Director for days before 9/11 YET no one mentions he had been Acting Deputy Director of the DOJ from January through May?

He took a 6 week vacation so to speak and came back to head the FBI and everyone acts like he dropped into DC July 5th and didnt know anything about anything.

________________

Congressional Record: August 2, 2001 (Senate) Page S8680-S8691 robert s. mueller, iii, to be director of the federal bureau of investigation

Mr. LEAHY. Madam President, I have moved swiftly in the Judiciary Committee to consider and move forward the nomination of Robert S. Mueller, III, to be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

His nomination was sent to the Senate on July 18 but his paperwork was not completed until July 24. Less than one week later, we held 2 days of hearings, on July 30 and 31, and made sure that the committee considered his nomination the same week, on August 2, in order to ensure committee and Senate consideration of this important nomination before the August recess. The committee unanimously and favorably reported this nomination. I thank the Democratic and Republican members of the committee for their cooperation and attention in allowing this nomination to move forward on an expedited basis. Mr. Mueller has had an outstanding career in law enforcement, serving as a Federal prosecutor in three different United States Attorneys' Offices and in Main Justice under both Republican and Democratic administrations. As he testified at his confirmation hearing, he has ``either personally prosecuted or supervised the prosecution of just about every type of Federal Criminal offense, including homicide, drug trafficking, organized crime, cyber crime, major frauds, civil rights and environmental crime.´´

Mr. Mueller was the only witness at his hearings. The committee did not call other witnesses we are in the midst of intensive and ongoing FBI oversight hearings. These FBI oversight hearings were an integral part of the committee's preparation to consider the nomination of a new FBI Director, and Mr. Mueller's opening statement at his confirmation hearings specifically addressed significant issues raised in the prior hearings.

At the oversight hearing on June 20, 2001, the committee examined both outside oversight mechanisms and methods to restore confidence in the FBI.

Witnesses included former Senator John C. Danforth, who investigated the events at Waco as Special Counsel to the Attorney General; the Honorable William H. Webster, former FBI and CIA Director, currently heading a review of FBI security in the aftermath of the Hanssen espionage case; Glenn A. Fine, current Inspector General of the Department of Justice; Michael R. Bromwich, former Inspector General of the Department of Justice; and Norman J. Rabkin, Managing Director, Tax Administration and Justice Issues, General Accounting Office.

At the oversight hearing on July 18, 2001, the committee considered the reform of FBI management with views from inside and outside the FBI. Witnesses included Raymond W. Kelly, former New York City Police Commissioner and Commissioner of the U.S. Customs Service; Bob E. Dies, FBI Assistant Director for Information Resources; Kenneth H. Senser, Acting FBI Deputy Assistant Director for Security Programs and Countermeasures; John E. Roberts, Unit Chief, FBI Office of Professional Responsibility; John Werner, former Supervisory Special Agent, FBI Office of Professional Responsibility; Frank L. Perry, Supervisory Senior Resident Agent, Raleigh, North Carolina, and former head of the Office of Law Enforcement Ethics at the FBI

______________

WASHINGTON (CNN) Mueller confirmed as FBI chief

August 2, 2001 Posted: 9:15 PM EDT (0115 GMT)

-- The Senate voted unanimously Thursday to confirm Robert Mueller as FBI director.

The Senate vote was 98-0 to approve Mueller for a 10-year term, the same day the Senate Judiciary Committee recommended his confirmation. The 56-year-old veteran prosecutor was President Bush's pick to lead the bureau. He told the Judiciary Committee during a two-day confirmation hearing that his top priority would be to "restore the public's confidence in the FBI, to re-earn the faith and trust of the American people."

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, the Judiciary Committee's chairman, said Mueller should be prepared to "clean house if necessary."

_______________

Mueller assumes the helm of FBI September 5, 2001 Posted: 10:52 AM EDT (1452 GMT)

  WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Robert Mueller took charge of the FBI Tuesday, becoming the sixth director of the United States' top law enforcement agency, which has been plagued by a recent series of blunders. Justice Department and FBI officials said Mueller was sworn in during an early-morning, private ceremony in Attorney General John Ashcroft's office across the street from FBI headquarters. Bush nominates Robert Mueller as head of FBI

________________

Washington, July 5 US PRESIDENT George W Bush on Friday nominated Justice Department veteran Robert Mueller as head of Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), an administration official said.

His task is to restore prestige of FBI, which has suffered from a string of embarrassments ranging from bungled documents to the discovery of a spy for the Russians in its midst, the official said. The news follows intense speculation about whom Bush would pick to replace Louis Freeh, who announced his resignation on May 1, well in advance of the end of his term set for 2003.

Mueller, who served as acting deputy attorney general from January to May, serves as US Attorney in San Francisco. He had previously headed homicide division of the US Attorney's office here.

If confirmed by the Senate, Mueller gets a ten-year term.

46 posted on 05/27/2002 5:15:49 PM PDT by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
I didnt think of that!
47 posted on 05/27/2002 5:20:18 PM PDT by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
FRom the second link you posted..."Witnesses, Israelis..."

**snip**
Israeli Prime Minister Rabin offered Israeli assistance in the OKC bombing investigation to the US a few days after the bombing. President Clinton rejected the Israeli offer. At the time, Rabin’s terrorism advisor, Yigal Carmon, described to US journalists a known Hamas terrorist cell in OKC which the Israeli’s suspected in the OKC bombing. Israel sent bomb experts to OKC and they concluded that the damage to the Murrah Building was likely caused by a device that Middle Eastern terrorists had helped McVeigh construct.
**end snip**

This is very disturbing to read in hindsight... The question we are asking..."WHO knew what and WHEN"...we might be better off asking WTF was Clinton doing for 8 years and why didn't he do ANYTHING to protect this country!

48 posted on 05/27/2002 6:09:09 PM PDT by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
The part about the uniqueness of the OKC bomb is a real eye opener if true. Does anyone else have another source for that? Just because McVeigh was the grunt that drove the truck, it has now been shown that the Islamic terrorists have access to other blue eyed recruits. Johhny Walker comes to mind.
49 posted on 05/27/2002 6:19:58 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
I believe Clinton did know exactly what happened in OKC and who was responsible for it, but in an effort to snatch (?) camera time biting his lip and feeling thier pain he decided it would play much better, with Monica and Impeachment in the works and Paula Jones breathing down his neck, to have some right wing skin head liberation front flunky (who had converted to Islam during Desert Storm), take the blame.

George Stephenopolis said as much on a TV news show (I think, can't remember which show) when he said they ran to the War Situation Room and Clinton said "not another terrorist bombing" or some such statement. He knew. He played it for all it was worth. There was no mention of this on any other news source. I have seen it referred to here.

50 posted on 05/27/2002 6:32:26 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
The Bush administration is not trying to stop an investigation by the Intelligence Committe in Congress, they simply do not want an independent commission to delve into it for circus reason.
51 posted on 05/27/2002 6:35:31 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan,okcsubmariner,all
Please do your best not to consider this a flame.

It is unclear to me how you and so many others are unable to seek the link without the word "tinfoil" (or something like it) popping up.

You want "major news organizations"? How about the Sydney Herald?

Or the Washington Post?

No mention of OKC, but all the facts are still there.

Or Bill O'Reilly at Fox News?

Or John Gibson?

And if that's not enough, what about THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES?

I truly wonder about this. Is it somehow related to the fact that people don't want to even consider the possibilty that Timothy McVeigh didn't plan the OKC bombing? Is is that they don't want to consider the possibility that McVeigh went to his death with information that might have prevented future terrorism? Remember, nobody is saying he was innocent or had no responsibility for the bombing.

I just wonder, given the massive screwups we've seen at the FBI, and the fact that his attorneys tried so hard to prove a Middle Eastern connection to the case.

Why is is so impossible McVeigh was not the "mastermind" he made himself out to be?

If anyone read "American Terrorist" they should note that one big question McVeigh did not even attempt to answer was how he learned to build such a massive, destructive bomb without out a college education or any real experience with explosives.

Given all of this, is it so difficult to see that some might ponder why John Ashcroft was in such a rush to see McVeigh executed? Talk about the Emperor's new clothes.

And please give those links at least a review before responding. Thanks.

52 posted on 05/27/2002 6:36:41 PM PDT by glorygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: goody2shooz
Like what accusations that would hurt the Bush administration?
53 posted on 05/27/2002 6:37:30 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
I think most Americans think OKC was terrorists. The Press sits on it and the Feds ignore it.
54 posted on 05/27/2002 6:40:31 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
One must not forget who built the FBI and used its files for his own vendettas. It is a legacy of CYA and protect the (Clinton) administration. JEH hated Bobby Kennedy and would have done anything to sink the Kennedys. Unfortunately he lost his teeth just about then and was forced into retirement. The CIA is just a corrupt in thier intelligence hoarding as the FBI. It is time for a reorganization. The dems are playing with fire, seeing as both organizations have been under Clinton corruption for years also.
55 posted on 05/27/2002 6:45:52 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
My bet is that since nothing seems to be sticking to Bush Jr, the dems are going further back than Clinton, their Going for X41. If they can tie "Dad" in on anything and I mean anything at all, it will give them a stage to begin a "birds of a feather" smear campagne..

Now, this is pure speculation (at it's worst most likely). But X41 is a goood target for them. X42 stills enjoys his lovefest with teh media. He is their darling and always will be...So it shouldn't be too hard to supress further info on the scumbag as they skip by him on the road to Bush Sr.

56 posted on 05/27/2002 6:48:39 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
"Lone nut right wing fanatic" or middle-east terrorists?

Apply occam's razor..the answer is fairly simple.

57 posted on 05/27/2002 6:53:28 PM PDT by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Well you seem to believe the reports given you...I don't. TWA 800 has been a calculated cover up a la Clinton as well as the Egypt Air...I believe we had a test run on a cabin attack...and seriously doubt the reports given us VIA the Clinton administration.
58 posted on 05/27/2002 7:00:03 PM PDT by antivenom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
ping
59 posted on 05/27/2002 7:02:26 PM PDT by pkpjamestown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RFP; xsysmgr
HILLARY CLINTON SHOULD BE CAREFUL WHAT SHE WISHES FOR. . .
THE REAL PROXIMATE CAUSE OF 9/11
 

What did he know. . . and when did he know it ?

by Mia T

5.17.02

 
"The instant that second plane hit, I said to the person with whom I was speaking, 'Bin Laden did this.' I knew immediately. I know what this network can do."

bill clinton

 

 

Clinton's FBI Learned In 1995 Of Plot To Use Terror Jetliner

Clinton Warned on Bin Laden Hijack-Kamikaze Plot

Clinton Let Bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize 

  

Notwithstanding the above, or more precisely, because of it, hillary clinton, in a Senate speech yesterday, called on President Bush...and not her inept, depraved husband...or, for that matter, her inept, depraved self...to "come before the American people at the earliest possible time to answer the questions so many New Yorkers and Americans are asking...so that...a 9/11 doesn't happen again."

it won't s-p-i-n

No sign of intelligent life above.

The rapist virtually indicts himself as the proximate cause of 9/11...and his zipper-hoisted one-trick pony horse oink boar bore is too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the jig is up, that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age is not about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.

Humpty DUMMIES
 
The Real Danger of a Presidential Fake:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
 
They ARE space aliens

 

IT IS OBVIOUS Q ERTY6

it won't s-p-i-n

utter failurerodham-clinton reality-check

4th-Estate Malfeasance (DEATH BY MISREPORT)

BUMP!

it won't s-p-i-n
 
IT IS OBVIOUS  
 
Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars
BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."
THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF
 
The Real Danger of a Presidential Fake:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President
 
 
CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme Fails Again
Ollie North Laughs Ann Lewis Off Stage
 
Helen Thomas Syndrome: THE SYMPTOMS
 
Will Riefenstahl-esque "editing to perfection" resurrect the clintons?
 
WHOSE DOG WAS WAGGED?
 
Frankenstein, The Sequel:
'Black Hawk Down' Was Set to Blame Clinton for 9/11
 
hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar,
Continues to Subsist on Cozy Clintonoid Interviews of Colmes Kind
 
hillary's head revisited:
hillary clinton's brain (such as it is) II
 
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers
 
 "The Daschle Scheme"
 
THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT:
Analyzed and Annotated
 
See also:
 
Can the President Think?
 
THE MYTH OF HILLARY'S BRILLIANCE
 
Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy
 
OFF THE RECORD: AN OLD DOG NEEDS NEW TRICKS
 
The man is an artist: He's not just 'Slick Willie' anymore
 
Hey, what a party!
New Year's at the White House
  
Senator Dim Bulb by Gary Aldrich © 2001 WorldNetDaily.com
Annotated by Mia T
 
Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T,

On Neutered and Neutering

by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)


60 posted on 05/27/2002 7:09:32 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson