Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion-rights groups endorse governor's bid
The Sacramento Bee ^ | March 27, 2002 | Herbert A. Sample

Posted on 03/27/2002 5:27:06 PM PST by nickcarraway

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:34:00 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

SAN FRANCISCO -- Moving to strike a chord with "pro-choice" voters, Democratic Gov. Gray Davis accepted the endorsement of two abortion-rights groups Tuesday and derided the anti-abortion views of his Republican foe, Bill Simon.

Leaders of the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) and its California affiliate said Davis had strongly protected and strengthened abortion rights during his long political career and, particularly, his three-plus years as governor.


(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: abortion; calgov2002; califrornia; elections; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: ElkGroveDan
Dems always try to make abortion the issue, even though the Governor really has very little to do with it in CA. The vast majority of people really don't care much about the issue. Of the small percentage who do consider it a major issue, the majority is pro-life. If they can make it the big issue then those who are moderately pro-choice will be more likely to vote Dem. That's why they do this every election year, and try to paint even pro-choice Pubs as "anti-choice extremists".
21 posted on 03/28/2002 8:55:12 AM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
How come being a life-chooser is anti-choice?
22 posted on 03/28/2002 9:28:03 AM PST by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Moving to strike a chord with "pro-choice" voters, Democratic Gov. Gray Davis accepted the endorsement of two abortion-rights groups Tuesday and derided the anti-abortion views of his Republican foe, Bill Simon.

This after Davis' own strategist spent all that money attacking Riordan, and helping Simon win the primary.

Way to go California! < thumbs up >

23 posted on 03/28/2002 9:32:06 AM PST by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"53% of California voters are women, and by a hefty majority they will be swayed by this issue. A lesson will be learned in this California election. An important one."

Dream on.Even woman have stopped believing that propaganda.

24 posted on 03/28/2002 10:41:53 AM PST by purereason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: evilsmoker
"Pong"
25 posted on 03/28/2002 10:42:47 AM PST by purereason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
The Death of the West


26 posted on 03/28/2002 11:30:29 AM PST by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: purereason
Whaddya mean even women? Have you been listening to the liberal media again???
27 posted on 03/28/2002 11:36:11 AM PST by evilsmoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
I think I'll add that to my least surprising headline collection. Along with "New Yorkers Suffer From Depression After 9/11" and "World's Oldest Woman Dies".
28 posted on 03/28/2002 11:50:10 AM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
I guess if the press say "Abortion is a women's issue" enough times, even conservatives will believe it.
29 posted on 03/28/2002 11:53:52 AM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: evilsmoker
Like I said "even woman".
30 posted on 03/28/2002 4:21:06 PM PST by purereason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hattend; ElkGroveDan; TwoStep
Thanks for paying attention. We have to keep reminding people that ABORTION IS A NON ISSUE IN STATE GOVERNMENT POLITICS. Bill Simon For Governor. Davis can spout any crock of garbage he thinks will make a difference. Simon will outsmart him because he stays cool and doesn't let Davis ruffle his feathers. Davis has already lost it several times.
31 posted on 03/28/2002 8:28:45 PM PST by broomhilda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
OK everybody, please let me make a counterpoint.

The abortion issue splits me away from pro-life candidates because I believe in an absolute right to a woman's medical privacy and her right to choose what to do with her own body. I realize that's not going to go over to well with most of you here, but I'll support that position without fatigue. Liberty is about leaving people alone with their own consciences. Liberty is about leaving religion out of government so that people can decide what's right and wrong for themselves, including their unborn babies.

The agreeable comment I have for each of you is simple: 9/11 has made me realize that I probably have to choose between national security and abortion freedoms. And it's a pretty easy choice when it comes down to it.

I make this next statement with a big smile on my face, and I hope you all understand the true warmth I have for you today -- I'm not being sarcastic! Read it and smile along with me: I've decided that all of you pro-life Republicans are a lot less scary than fundamentalist Islamic extremists, so I may find myself voting for Mr. Bush in the next election, and voting for Republican congressionals. After all, you're just saying that you value human life enough that it makes you angry and upset to think that some of them don't even get a chance at all. It's sweet and humane, and I'm going to have to deal with it somehow. However, in this forseable future -- even with a pro-life congress, a pro-life president, and a potentially pro-life supreme court, I won't stop reminding all of you that it's a loss of liberty to force women to do anything with their bodies.

Please forgive me for disagreeing. I know you all mean well, and I'm behind President Bush 100%. I can't say that I feel the same way about Bill Simon. Maybe there's a happy medium between Mr. Davis's positions and Mr. Simon's. I don't blame Davis for our energy crisis, and I think we haven't heard the whole story yet.

I think you all can see my dilemma. I can't seem to sway the Democratic party on getting back to basics. They're all wrong on so many issues, even the New Democrats. So in addition to all the other great things the Republicans are doing these days, why can't we have a Republican party that's neutral on labor, for keeping religion out of government, for protecting our natural resources, and positive on supporting public education (if in a much less politically correct manner). I can always hope.

32 posted on 03/14/2003 11:31:40 PM PST by risk (Liberty means you don't get to decide for her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson