Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Reaffirms Ties With Mexico
Herald Sun/Associated Press ^ | Mar 22, 2002 : 10:14 | SANDRA SOBIERAJ

Posted on 03/22/2002 8:35:22 PM PST by mykdsmom

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2002 8:35:22 PM PST by mykdsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
After he reaffirms his ties with Mexico, he might try reaffirming his ties with those who elected him by enforcing border and immigration laws.
2 posted on 03/22/2002 8:51:43 PM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Amen!
3 posted on 03/22/2002 9:26:15 PM PST by doglot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FITZ; Marine Inspector; Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy; Marine Inspector; sneakypete...
Does anyone doubt El Presidente Jorge Arbusto is a traitor?

It took Clinton 8 years to sell off our technology to our overseas enemies. It looks like it's Jorge's job to sell us out closer to home, and he'll accomplish that in record time.

I think it's time to start planning impeachment.

4 posted on 03/22/2002 9:51:59 PM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Not much chance, I'm afraid...his corrupt ties with business drooling for cheap wetback labor will assure not only amnesty for the 3 million, but 20 million more of them. Kiss the country goodbye.
5 posted on 03/22/2002 9:53:16 PM PST by SR71A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *immigrant_list
Indexing
6 posted on 03/22/2002 9:56:38 PM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
Does anyone doubt El Presidente Jorge Arbusto is a traitor?

Pretty serious charge there Cubbie.

7 posted on 03/22/2002 10:01:19 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
How do you pronounce Jorge? Isn't is something like: whore-gay?
8 posted on 03/22/2002 10:05:23 PM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SR71A
Got any good suggestions on who to vote for in 94? Libertarian Party is for open borders. Constitution party maybe?
9 posted on 03/22/2002 10:05:44 PM PST by Blazing Saddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom; Victoria Delsoul; Pelham; Travis McGee; Joe Hadenuf; sarcasm; harpseal; RonDog...
Bush said he seeks a policy that recognizes "the unique nature of the Mexican in our country ... and that we do have a special relationship between our countries, not only defined by NAFTA, but defined by cultural and historic ties."

Our policy ought to be to encourage Mexico to emulate more of the unique nature of Amnerica.



Fat chance.

10 posted on 03/22/2002 10:11:07 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Pretty serious charge there Cubbie.

Pretty serious sellout. Some of us believe in our sovereignty, and we're not giving it up to Mexico or Jorge's NWO.

11 posted on 03/22/2002 10:25:07 PM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
Okay, now let's talk about Impeachment. We had Clinton on so many things, yet the best they could come up with was lying under oath about Monica? Now, Clinton was a president who should have been prosecuted for treason or worse, and should be either sitting in jail, or worse. Nothing happened to him. Do you know why? Because he's connected. He's part of the great socialist machine, the one that tramples us law abiding folk under it's jackboots. You and I and everyone else who isn't in office, or is the CEO of a multi-national corporation mean nothing.

President Bush is a bought and paid for politician, just like everyone else in office. His vision of the future, is not like ours. WE Citizens want a sovereign nation, that is safe for every one of us to live in. We don't want massive illegal immigration, we don't want our nation given away to foreign enemies. Government's vision, of the future is of a one world order, with everyone marking time. That is NOT a future at all. That is the end of the United States.

12 posted on 03/22/2002 10:26:40 PM PST by MadRobotArtist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Never gonna happen.

Aprenda Espanol hoy, evite la prisa.

13 posted on 03/22/2002 10:37:52 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
"Mexico is different from other countries, not only because of our proximity, but because of our special relationship," Bush said at a joint news conference closing his talks with Fox at Monterrey's Governmental Palace.

Bush said he seeks a policy that recognizes "the unique nature of the Mexican in our country ... and that we do have a special relationship between our countries, not only defined by NAFTA, but defined by cultural and historic ties."

What Cultural Ties? Furthermore, you want to break the law, Bush, help destroy the American worker, etc.? Bush is WRONG for America.

14 posted on 03/22/2002 10:47:04 PM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
I think it's time to start planning impeachment.

You got it. When a President of the United States aids and abets a large-scale invasion of America by a foreign country that person is unfit for the office of presidency. Not only won’t Bush protect our borders to halt this invasion; he openly encourages more illegal immigration and refuses to enforce our federal immigration laws.

Bush has made himself crystal clear about his lack of regard for America’s sovereignty and by all appearances is not going to change despite a massive uproar of disapproval from the vast majority of Americans. These are certain grounds for impeachment. The sooner we get this guy out of office the less damage he will do to our sovereignty. Let the proceedings begin ASAP.

15 posted on 03/22/2002 10:55:37 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub
Pretty serious sellout. Some of us believe in our sovereignty, and we're not giving it up to Mexico or Jorge's NWO

Well if you are that serious I would assume you are going to make a citizens arrest of "Jorge" and charge him with treason. If you don't then by your inaction you are equally guilty of "treason". Somehow I think your rhetoric is bigger than your “patriotism”.

16 posted on 03/22/2002 11:05:34 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
I find myself wondering exactly how Presidente' Fox is able to sit down with Bush's lips so securely fastened to his butt(?)
17 posted on 03/22/2002 11:53:45 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Well if you are that serious I would assume you are going to make a citizens arrest of "Jorge" and charge him with treason. If you don't then by your inaction you are equally guilty of "treason". Somehow I think your rhetoric is bigger than your “patriotism”.

I suggest you acquaint yourself with the Constitution. It's a marvelous document.

18 posted on 03/22/2002 11:54:10 PM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom; SaberTooth
..... "We're analyzing not only what took place in the past, but the most effective way help Peru fight narcotics," he said .....

Dear Presidente Jorge

The most effective way "help Peru 'fight narcotics,'" is to be found in the repeal of

Prohibition, the only "drug crime"

I guarantee that once the consequences of repeal take effect, there will never be another "drug problem!

And you, El Presidente, will then be FReed to begin to take care of America's real concerns:

BORDERS!

LANGUAGE!

CULTURE!

Best ones, El Presidente

Brian

19 posted on 03/23/2002 12:01:21 AM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blazing Saddles
Got any good suggestions on who to vote for in 94? Libertarian Party is for open borders. Constitution party maybe?

I guess you mean '04, not 94...I don't know if any national candidate is going to have the guts to strongly oppose immigration. The last one who did, Buchanan, was vilified in the press, and on this forum, as a racist. That is the unfortunate fact. I think that a targeting strategy may be the best bet. Don't concentrate on the Presidential level, but focus on the loose border types at the House and Senate level. Send a message by voting for the Libertarian candidate. Yes, I know that they may not win -- but it will assure that the RINOs will lose . Yes, I know that this may cause the Dems to gain seats, but honestly, I sometimes feel that that will be the faster way to an honest electoral upheaval, which is badly needed . The only way to change what is happening is to plan for the destruction of one of the political parties. It makes no difference to me whether it is the Republicrats or the Demolicans. Don't forget -- the Whigs thought they were indestructible too.

20 posted on 03/23/2002 12:02:39 AM PST by SR71A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson