To: Blazing Saddles
Got any good suggestions on who to vote for in 94? Libertarian Party is for open borders. Constitution party maybe?I guess you mean '04, not 94...I don't know if any national candidate is going to have the guts to strongly oppose immigration. The last one who did, Buchanan, was vilified in the press, and on this forum, as a racist. That is the unfortunate fact. I think that a targeting strategy may be the best bet. Don't concentrate on the Presidential level, but focus on the loose border types at the House and Senate level. Send a message by voting for the Libertarian candidate. Yes, I know that they may not win -- but it will assure that the RINOs will lose . Yes, I know that this may cause the Dems to gain seats, but honestly, I sometimes feel that that will be the faster way to an honest electoral upheaval, which is badly needed . The only way to change what is happening is to plan for the destruction of one of the political parties. It makes no difference to me whether it is the Republicrats or the Demolicans. Don't forget -- the Whigs thought they were indestructible too.
20 posted on
03/23/2002 12:02:39 AM PST by
SR71A
To: SR71A
The last one who did, Buchanan, was vilified in the press, and on this forum, as a racist. Not because of immigration, but because he said there was no need to interfere with Hitler.
52 posted on
03/23/2002 1:14:32 PM PST by
#3Fan
To: SR71A
Well, I'm months late and a dollar short, but I somewhat agree with you. I've been cruising. That term racist bothers me as I am against open borders for any race! My state senators and representative are against open borders. We need to concentrate on all levels, and press is a thorn in the side. I used to think it best to vote for a third party, until Clinton served 2 terms, somehow. More Dems gaining seats is therefore not the answer. Libertarians favor free choice on abortions and open borders which I can't agree with. It's becoming a close call between demos and repubs. RINOs are a problem, but they have aways been a problem. Realistically, vote the least of two evils! Maybe it's good to have some funds in a more free foreign country, as USA seems to be a target for takeover by socialist, etc. In that case all improvements and incentives here would deteriorate rather quickly! Kind of like government housing, etc.etc.
To: SR71A
Well, I'm months late and a dollar short, but I somewhat agree with you. I've been cruising. That term racist bothers me as I am against open borders for any race! My state senators and representative are against open borders. We need to concentrate on all levels, and press is a thorn in the side. I used to think it best to vote for a third party, until Clinton served 2 terms, somehow. More Dems gaining seats is therefore not the answer. Libertarians favor free choice on abortions and open borders which I can't agree with. It's becoming a close call between demos and repubs. RINOs are a problem, but they have aways been a problem. Realistically, vote the least of two evils! Maybe it's good to have some funds in a more free foreign country, as USA seems to be a target for takeover by socialist, etc. In that case all improvements and incentives here would deteriorate rather quickly! Kind of like government housing, etc.etc.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson