Skip to comments.
Now That Bush Has Sold Us Out... What are we going to do about it? (vanity)
Posted on 03/13/2002 2:47:41 PM PST by Michael2001
Well I'm mad and I'm angry, and maybe that's why I can't think of an appropriate response. While all of us were prasing him for how he was dealing with the war on terror, Bush passes this Amnesty Bill, something that not even the sneaky Bill Clinton would do. This is one of the worse Bills to pass through Congress, it will hurt us in many ways, and ten years from now we will still be feeling it's effects.
Bush has, without a doubt in my mind, sold us out for the Hispanic vote. He sold us out because he can take our vote for granted (who will we vote for Al Gore?). Is he wrong? What do we do when the Republicans stop looking out for our interests? Is it time for a new party, or do we work within the party and try to root out the Republicans In Name Only (of which there are many)?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 921-925 next last
To: FastCoyote
Post 35. Very good one. Thanks
To: jeremiah
Why is it so important to sway latino voters?Latins are pretty conservative as a group and will be happy to vote GOP as long as we give them a reason to.
The GOP screwed up with the black population and needs to counter the 10-1 trouncing they get from them in every election.
If the GOP fails we will become the minority party for the foreseeable future.
It's that simple.
To: Texasforever
True southerners are not afraid of the guy that mows their lawn. Geeze what a wuss, please change your screen name.Your attempt to minimize this massive invasion into our country by millions of illegal aliens is truly offensive.
To: Rome2000
This bill is not confined to just, "Mexicans." It is not confined to any foreign government or geographical region of the globe. It simply confined to those that can show that they have been residents of America and are without proper papers.
Yup! Even Osama bin Laden might apply!
To: Jim Robinson
Thanks for the comments Jim. I understand where you're coming from, although I disagree. I don't think you're compeletely happy with agenda that is being passed through the Republican controlled House. That's why I can't understand what you think a Republican Senate will buy you.
If Gore was in there right now, at least some of his agenda would be opposed by Republicans. But now that Bush has pushed certain liberal agenda items, nobody is left to oppose them. Personally, I shudder to think what will happen when a far left of center party controls all three houses.
The issues I've touched on are far left of center. Bush will be able to ram through anything he desires. And from what I've seen of his desires, I'm not looking forward to the prospects.
Again, thanks for the comments.
To: Joe Hadenuf
I do not support amnesty for anyone BUT, 99.9% of this bill has absolutely NOTHING to do with the part that extends the time to apply BTW did you find the part that identified the untold millions that you have been spouting off about or, are you ready to concede that part?. So yes I will support a bill that I agree with 99% an day.
To: Buckeroo
Tsk; merely paraphrasing. I see you lose concepts with your blinders held intently over your eyes while walking the straight and narrow political mantra of the government. The government created your quote, the quote wasn't by a proud and free people. You remind me of someone asking government for freedom. This is a simple little dish: You just put all the metaphors in a blender -- it doesn't matter which ones, just throw them all in -- and then turn it on frappé. Isn't that lovely? It doesn't look or taste like anything coherent.
To: Willie Green
Thanks Willie. I don't think you ever accepted the lesser of twos doctrine. Take care.
To: Michael2001
This bill is NOT a blanket amnesty for all illegals as most posters here seem to assume. Go back to post #131 by deport, and read the bill. I didn't understand all that I read, but the current 'amnesty' appears to be simply an extension of the deadlines for alien's who's visas have expired, to register with the INS. They have to file a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponser such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty.
This puts their name on record while they wait for a hearing with the INS to have their citizenship status reviewed. It is not a guarantee of citizenship, and has no effect whatsoever on the thousands who slipped over the border without paperwork.
Having read a majority of the postings here, I am dismayed that so many FReepers are ready to jump ship over an issue they didn't bother to get the facts on before plunging into a rant.
To: Timesink
When Bush has a photo-op, with "former illegals" on the WH steps, who do you think will be beside him? Daschle, Biden and any other Democrat that can wrangle an invite. Of course GW being so gracious, will want to share credit for this amnesty bill. Then of course since a overwhelming majority of Democrats voted yea on this bill, as opposed to most Republicans voting against it, and voila', this is a gift to the Illegals, by the Democrats, paid for with Republican political capital.
To: Joe Hadenuf
Your attempt to minimize this massive invasion into our country by millions of illegal aliens is truly offensive. "Don't Mess With Texas"!! Hey, if it's on a T-shirt, it must be true. Nothing to see here.
To: DoughtyOne
Well, it's either a Republican Senate or a Democrat Senate. I believe we will probably end up with a better judiciary with the Republicans in control than we will with the Democrats. I could be wrong, but it's just the way I see it. Thanks, Jim
To: AmishDude
Are you another rendition of CJ? I think I am going to have fun with you two, "boobsie_twins" or is that, "bush_babies?"
To: Buckeroo
Yup! Even Osama bin Laden might apply! Buck please stop while you are behind. From the text of the bill:
SEC. 306. RESTRICTION ON ISSUANCE OF VISAS TO NONIMMIGRANTS FROM COUNTRIES THAT ARE STATE SPONSORS OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM.
(a) IN GENERAL- No nonimmigrant visa under section 101(a)(15) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)) shall be issued to any alien from a country that is a state sponsor of international terrorism unless the Secretary of State determines, in consultation with the Attorney General and the heads of other appropriate United States agencies, that such alien does not pose a threat to the safety or national security of the United States. In making a determination under this subsection, the Secretary of State shall apply standards developed by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Attorney General and the heads of other appropriate United States agencies, that are applicable to the nationals of such states.
Comment #595 Removed by Moderator
To: southern rock
LOL! Thanks for being up front and honest. I don't seem to get that from to many Texans these days. Hopefully, one day, with the right leadership, we will turn things around.
To: Rome2000
He could circumvent the Rats giving blanket amnesty, by ordering the immediate deportation of any and all peoples in this country illegaly. As for any citizens born of illegals, they will be permitted to stay, we can open orphanages or put them up for adoption. I'm betting that the people will take their kids back home, or leave them with relatives in the State to take care of. When the Rats get back in power, they will have no amnesty to give, and will beat up the Republicans with the subject, but then again, they beat them up at every turn. You see, they don't care if it is the truth or a lie, they attack, and we retreat.
To: All
You folks are going to rip this party apart. Keep it up....
To: Michael2001
My initial reaction is to vote for a third party candidate and hope if he gets enough votes, and it causes the Republicans to lose the presidency it will send them a message. Alone this statement it shows me that you have a "ZERO" understanding of the political process going on in Washington. Further more by trowing temper tantrums like this, it shows how infantile and narrow minded your thinking is.
Based on your statements it will be futile to even try to reason with you.
599
posted on
03/13/2002 9:00:04 PM PST
by
danmar
To: Texasforever
Man, you are ignorant.
In 1994, Senator Ted Kennedy wrote an amendment to a bill about this that became law. The amendment added a question to the INS application, "Are you or have you ever been a terrorist within or outside of the United States?" Please check "yes*" or "no".
* = if you checked "yes", this will not necessarily deny your application.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580, 581-600, 601-620 ... 921-925 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson