Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Geographic Finds Girl in Famed Photo
Yahoo News (Reuters) ^ | Wed Mar 13,10:44 AM ET | Sue Pleming

Posted on 03/13/2002 10:15:56 AM PST by ThePythonicCow

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For nearly two decades, National Geographic (news - web sites) has been flooded with requests for information about a beautiful Afghan teen-ager with piercing green eyes whose cover image became one of its most recognized photographs.

Photos

Reuters Photo
But the woman's identity has only just been uncovered after the National Geographic photographer who first saw her in a refugee camp in Pakistan 18 years ago, finally tracked down the woman in a remote village south of Jalalabad, Afghanistan (news - web sites).

"Every time I went there (to Afghanistan or Pakistan), I asked about her, but I never had any leads," freelance photographer Steve McCurry, who took the picture for National Geographic in 1984, told Reuters.

McCurry says hardly a day has gone by that people have not asked him about the young woman, whose name he did not take down when he took her picture for the January 1985 cover of National Geographic.

This January, he returned with a National Geographic team to the Nasir Bagh refugee camp in Pakistan where he took the picture and found someone who said he grew up with the woman's brother.

"The refugee camp was set to close and so I knew this was my only chance to find her," said McCurry. "I couldn't believe it when the brother finally turned up with his sister. I knew immediately it was her."

The woman, who is now about 30 years old, was identified as Sharbat Gula. She remembered McCurry taking the picture but had never seen a copy of it and was surprised and embarrassed by all the attention it attracted.

Gula got married shortly after McCurry first saw her and had four daughters, one of whom died in infancy. She was repatriated from the camp in 1992 and returned to Afghanistan with her family.

Her life had been tough in Afghanistan and McCurry said she had struggled to survive.

"What the second picture shows is that she is still alive and survived quite well in fact ... but that pain and hardship is still written in her face. It is not a face of joy," he added.

NEW PHOTOS TAKEN

A conservative Pashtun, Gula sought her husband's permission to lift her veil to show her face for the latest photographs, which appear in National Geographic's April edition.

McCurry said he saw Gula as a representative of the plight of the Afghan people, who endured an extended war with the Soviet Union and the rise and fall of the Taliban.

"She's really emblematic of the Afghan spirit," he said, adding that a education fund had been set up by National Geographic for young Afghan girls.

National Geographic used several scientific methods to ensure they had found the right woman, including iris recognition in which the colored portion of the eye is examined.

No two human irises are the same and a direct match holds a near 100 percent probability of authenticity, National Geographic said. The woman's eyes were found to be a perfect match.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: nationalgeographic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs;EggsAckley;wtc911;Aedammair;crystalk
Thank you (and a few others I may have inadvertantly left out) for being the Voice Of Reason concerning this subject.

I can't believe all of the posters who were expecting a Supermodel to emerge from the mountains of Tora Bora.

This was one of my favorite photographs when it came out. Everytime I saw it, I found myself just staring at it. I had never forgotten her image. For a while, I used it as my desktop image. That photo was so hauntingly beautiful.

After 9/11 when troops started going into Afghanistan, I found myself thinking again of this photo and wondering what had become of that poor girl. I had assumed she had long perished under Soviet hostilities, Taliban rule or just general harsh conditions of that lifestyle. I figured she would never be heard from again.

Yesterday's news completely floored me! I couldn't believe she had been found and positively identified!

She won't become rich. According to the National Geographic article she doesn't want to. She wants to return to anonymity. The article (look also here) says that she will be provided for.

Her life will never be the same though. It is simply a miracle that she has survived.

81 posted on 03/13/2002 3:52:47 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Time is merciless to beauty.
82 posted on 03/13/2002 3:58:26 PM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matamoros
Another thing the photo doesn't show you... she probably has more eyes than teeth.

You'd be surprised. These people don't eat much candy or drink much sodapop. Before refined sugar became widely used, many people had very good teeth. Skulls found in England that are 1000 years old showed tooth decay to be relatively rare.

83 posted on 03/13/2002 4:05:53 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Yes - that is a better version of her pictures - thanks.
84 posted on 03/13/2002 4:33:48 PM PST by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68
Excellent post.

I didn't realize the picture of her on the cover of National Geographic dated back to the eighties; I thought it was a recent picture. I still see the beauty in her, and she was an absolutely striking natural beauty during her teen years.

Thanks for sharing the picture; it's touching.

85 posted on 03/13/2002 5:48:25 PM PST by Aedammair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: blam
Aussie actor--Gladiator, LA Confidential, Beautiful Mind. Exceedingly easy on the eyes.
86 posted on 03/14/2002 5:28:57 AM PST by grellis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
National Geographic used several scientific methods to ensure they had found the right woman, including iris recognition in which the colored portion of the eye is examined.

This sounds rather far-fetched to me.

I know that professional photographers use high-quality equipment and film, but wouldn't a more detail close-up of the iris be necessary? Not just a portrait? I'd think too much detail would be lost to perform iris recognition. (Although she DOES have very striking eyes.)

87 posted on 03/14/2002 5:39:42 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
You are right. The clowns on this thread who comment on her looks are the same ones who would be the first to accuse Hollywood and the Media for selling us the image of perfection instead of integrity.

No, that thought would never occur to them.
They're too preoccupied gawking at Hollyweird's meat market.

88 posted on 03/14/2002 5:47:16 AM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
How strange that you think that. I think she's just as beautiful today, I'll bet if she had something to smile about you would see that beauty. What is so tragic is that the pain you see in the teenage face has been intensified in the adult. I can't even imagine how bad her life must have been.
89 posted on 03/14/2002 5:56:37 AM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
I heard that when the photographer took the first picture, she was in a school room, her parents had recently been killed, and she was basically suffering from what I'd call shellshock, hence the frightened, wide-open eyes.

She's still pretty. She has obviously gained some weight, so her face has filled out considerably, but that's her, and she's still pretty.

And I've always thought the Afghans were basically attractive people. They and the Iranians are better looking than the Pakistanis and Arabs, IMHO.

90 posted on 03/14/2002 6:03:43 AM PST by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Nasty. A girl can change a lot in 15 years. That is why you should always check out their mothers before you marry them.

You are a very shallow person...

91 posted on 03/14/2002 6:04:38 AM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Guna
I was thinking the same thing. The nose is completely different.
92 posted on 03/14/2002 6:10:21 AM PST by Giddyupgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Aedammair
I agree too.Take any attractive 17yr old teenager and go back 150yrs and make her live in the mountains of Colorado. Come back 17yrs and see what she she what she looks like.

I bet if you would take that lady clean her up,fix her hair and give her some nice clothes she would be beautiful.

93 posted on 03/14/2002 6:22:36 AM PST by MOTraditionalCathAnne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Giddyupgo
True, but the nose, lips, and cheeks are the same.

I say that she is a portrait of tenacity.

94 posted on 03/14/2002 6:23:28 AM PST by Gamecock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
Shows the truth in a picture being "worth a thousand words".

I doubt any writer could convey what those photos do.

Regards

95 posted on 03/14/2002 6:26:59 AM PST by Tinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
**We spend our lives going from one pair of eyes to another,one set of expectations to the next, looking for ourselves until one day,if we are lucky, we stop and decide to look inside, where, indeed,beauty is in the eye of the beholder. **

BUMP

96 posted on 03/14/2002 6:41:59 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wtc911, Hillary's Lovely Legs
You are right. The clowns on this thread who comment on her looks are the same ones who would be the first to accuse Hollywood and the Media for selling us the image of perfection instead of integrity.

For this woman to even be alive, let alone raising a family under the conditions she must endure, is a testament to the strength of the human spirit. She has been tested her entire life in ways that we can't fully imagine. I doubt that many of these yahoos have her character. She was a gift to us then. She is a gift to us now.

Agreed. A bunch of morons on this thread. This gal asked her husband's permission to remove her burka (sp?) for the new photo. One can only imagine what the harsh weather, lack of skin care products would do any woman's face - let alone the difficult life and loss of a child. People just need to back off. Sheesh. The ignorance and superficiality is apalling here on FR sometimes....

Cheers, CC :)

97 posted on 03/14/2002 6:51:40 AM PST by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Kalashnikov_68
Thanks for posting this additional photo. She's still hauntingly beautiful.
98 posted on 03/14/2002 6:55:07 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: MOTraditionalCathAnne
Thanks for the reply.

There are many women I work with that are "beautiful by the bottle". Do away with their make-up, dye-job and blow dryer, and what remains are plain women (disturbingly so, after first impressions have been formed with the make-up on), without the piercing eyes of this woman, and the strength of character developed by trying times and real deprivation.

P.S. Really like your screen name!

99 posted on 03/14/2002 9:29:17 AM PST by Aedammair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Guna
I dunno, the nose looks completely different on the other photo. It is beaked now. Nose shapes don't change that much, do they?

It's 100% certainly her, according to the experts. They've verified it with iris recognition, a unique and very reliable biometric identification method.

MM

100 posted on 03/14/2002 12:31:48 PM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson