Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo doubts he can block amnesty-extension bill
Denver Post ^ | March 8, 2002 | Bill McAllister

Posted on 03/08/2002 1:24:33 PM PST by sarcasm

Friday, March 08, 2002 - WASHINGTON - Rep. Tom Tancredo takes credit for thwarting the Bush administration's last effort to offer partial amnesty to thousands of illegal residents, but Thursday the outspoken immigration foe said he may have been outmaneuvered by the White House.

President Bush has struck a deal with the House leadership to place legislation that offers an extension of amnesty on its consent calendar before Bush heads to Mexico for a state visit next week, the Colorado Republican said.

That action should ensure quick House passage of legislation that Bush has repeatedly sought from Congress. It would allow an undocumented person to receive legal standing, such as a valid green card, by filing a declaration with the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

It presumably also would require the person to have been in the United States by a certain date and have filed a declaration with the INS from an appropriate sponsor, such as a relative or employer, and pay a $1,000 penalty.

"The terms are still up in the air," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration, a group that has been allied with Tancredo. "We've heard to the effect that the president wants something to bring down to Mexico."

The initial Bush proposal, designed exclusively for Mexicans, once was high on the president's legislative wish list, but it was delayed after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11. However, as the president noted Wednesday in a speech to the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, he now is pushing for the extension of the amnesty program known by the section of immigration law that covers it, Section 245I.

The president hailed it as a way to reunite family, separated by the border. "If you believe in family values, if you understand the worth of family and the importance of family, let's get 245I out of the United States Congress and give me a chance to sign it," Bush told the chamber members.

Tancredo, the head of a congressional caucus on immigration issues and proponent of halting virtually all immigration, said he had blocked a previous attempt by Bush to push an extension of the amnesty program through the House. But this time, he said House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., had agreed to place the issue on the suspension, or consent, calendar, making it difficult to defeat the proposal.

The Senate might be more favorable to the bill than the House, expanding the numbers of individuals who can apply, Tancredo said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freetrade; hughhewitt; immigrantlist; nwo; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,061-2,0802,081-2,1002,101-2,120 ... 2,941-2,945 next last
Comment #2,081 Removed by Moderator

To: Old Hickory
For those of us who live in CA, it's already happening. Proposition 39 passed last year deleting the 2/3's requirement for bond issues; this year, virtually every school district passed bonds (mine included).

Behind every vote - For Prop. 39, for the bonds, against any tax reduction - was Eliseo Medina and the Service Employees International Union, which is largely made up of illegals. Who of course loves this amnesty. Isn't it nice to see the kind of people Bush hangs out with?

2,082 posted on 03/12/2002 4:10:38 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2070 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Straight Democrat ticket for me through 2004.

I may be conservative, but I am not like the blacks in the Democrat party where you can deficate on them and still get my vote.

I appreciate the sentiment, but if you vote for the Dems you are still voting for the corrupt "two" party system. Plus the Dems have even more unredeeming features than do the GOP. Either don't vote, or vote for a third party, or write in your own candidate on the ballot (try writing in George Washington or Thomas Jefferson; if the dead can win senate seats in Missouri, well, why not?).

Also I would not give up on the GOP entirely. Remember, the system is rigged against third parties, and we have not had a new successful party since the Republicans in 1860, and they succeeded in part by cannibalizing the Whigs. If a third party representing American interests does emerge in future, it will probably do so by encouraging major defections from the GOP. Until then we need our people active within at least one of the major parties, and that in effect means the GOP...for now.

2,083 posted on 03/12/2002 4:11:01 PM PST by Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1955 | View Replies]

Comment #2,084 Removed by Moderator

To: Egg
Nah, you probably scared him so much that Gekas got on the phone to swap a vote with someone who was originally going to vote no but ended up voting yes in exchange. We've been had here.

Could be though I kind of doubt it. Some other Freeper must have pushed him over the edge. Yes, anyone following politics for awhile has seen the old shell game vote trading scam. I was surprised that my rep. Don Manzullo voted Nay given his crummy score of 50% on immigration bills as compiled by numbersusa. I suspect he might have traded his vote too. Amnesty out in my neck of the woods would not sell well. Then again I did call his office about 8 times in the last 2 weeks and inundated him with e-mails and faxes.

2,085 posted on 03/12/2002 4:11:24 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2005 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
No Republican votes for me until then. George W. Bush is a dispicable traitor, an I regret ever voting for him or touting him as honorable.

I'm with you brother. I was pretty fanatical on Bush, but he's lost me forever at this point. Being an honest guy and a good Commander in Chief isn't enough for me when nearly every horrid bit of legislation from the Education bill, to CFR, to this insane policy has been generated by him.

FOI: Be prepared to catch a lot of hell around here from the Bushelmania crowd.

2,086 posted on 03/12/2002 4:11:31 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2024 | View Replies]

To: Guynethia
THIS WILL SECURE HIS RE-ELECTION.

ANTI-IMMIGRATION CONSERVATIVES ARE BOTHERED BUT KNOW HE IS AS GOOD AS IT GETS RIGHT NOW.

HISPANIC CATHOLICS WILL GO WILD FOR HIM NOW, I DO BELIEVE.

THIS IS A SHREWD IF PURELY POLITICAL MOVE.

2,087 posted on 03/12/2002 4:11:42 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2075 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?; madfly
How many of these FORMERLY 'illegal aliens' are pilots?

And here is some more sobering food for thought.

Quota Hiring has seen to it that a very large number of foreign and domestic-born America haters are now "legitimate" aircrew members -- and are, thanks to "seniority," working their undeserved way into Command Positions.

And as one who has had to fly around the world with this scum as crew members, I can vouch that many of them are unbelieveably dangerous even before their politics are taken under consideration!

2,088 posted on 03/12/2002 4:12:17 PM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2026 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
You OBVIOUSLY don't live ANYWHERE near the "problem".
2,089 posted on 03/12/2002 4:14:02 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2087 | View Replies]

To: ALL
Someone give the Savage Nation a call and bring this issue up. He's not even talking about it. Andrea Yates, an important issue, I'll admit, is what he's talking about.

The number is 1-800-449-8255

2,090 posted on 03/12/2002 4:15:30 PM PST by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2005 | View Replies]

Comment #2,091 Removed by Moderator

To: Notwithstanding
Maybe he could secure more of the criminal vote by pardoning all of the felons currently in federal prison.
2,092 posted on 03/12/2002 4:16:00 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2087 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
"THIS IS A SHREWD IF PURELY POLITICAL MOVE."

Yep. Just like The U.S. Patriot Act, and all of the rest of his shrewd moves.

2,093 posted on 03/12/2002 4:16:13 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2087 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Me three, Clinton was a cad and a bafoon, Bush is rattle snake dangerous.
2,094 posted on 03/12/2002 4:16:51 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2025 | View Replies]

Comment #2,095 Removed by Moderator

To: majordivit
Anyone who thinks principled and politician are even slighty synonymous are living in a fantasyworld. The same House leaders who gave us the Clinton impeachment now voting for amnesties are as hypocrytical as the man they were rightly impeaching.
2,096 posted on 03/12/2002 4:18:05 PM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2074 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
....those polls will drop like a ton of bricks.

Let 'em drop.

BUSH

OUT THE DOOR IN 2004

2,097 posted on 03/12/2002 4:18:26 PM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2065 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
"Maybe he could secure more of the criminal vote by pardoning all of the felons currently in federal prison"

No, his Daddy did that. They work for jr. now. They're "Rehabilitated".

Or is that "ReCycled"?

2,098 posted on 03/12/2002 4:18:52 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2092 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Oh, but he soon will be living near the problem. It's everywhere now, and this stupidity is going to make even more come. Some people need to wake up like I did to the fact that Bush is destroying the Republican party from within. Look at NJ, Virginia, Ca. I see a plan coming to fruition, and some on this board won't notice it until it's to late.(NOVEMBER)
2,099 posted on 03/12/2002 4:19:33 PM PST by Oregon Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2089 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
He has lost as many, if not more votes than he will win from this back stabbing. It will be an election repeat of 2000, and here is the bitter pill, he may not run again.

When he said days after he won the election that he may be a one term president, that he may not run again, I went uh oh. He has brought as much if not more ruination on us than Clinton ever dreamed of.

2,100 posted on 03/12/2002 4:20:39 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2087 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,061-2,0802,081-2,1002,101-2,120 ... 2,941-2,945 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson