Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dinosaur With Mature Feathers Uncovered in China
AP via Fox News ^ | 3/6/2002

Posted on 03/06/2002 12:32:35 PM PST by CholeraJoe

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:32:43 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Paleontologists working in China say they have unearthed the first fossil of a dinosaur that appeared to have mature feathers identical to those of modern birds, including long, showy plumage on its tail and hind legs.

The U.S.-Chinese research team said the 3-foot fossil should settle once and for all the debate over whether birds and dinosaurs are related.


(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: CholeraJoe
A creature that might have feathers on it's tail...about 3 feet long....there is NO chain of evidence it evolved from anything, nor is there any chain of evidence anything evolved from IT either !!

You evolutionists must be democrats to be so stupid, I am not joking

21 posted on 03/06/2002 12:52:00 PM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
were the feathers from Nordstroms? :)

Niemann Marcus. They've got EVERYTHING.

22 posted on 03/06/2002 12:53:07 PM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
and so pigs can actually fly!!
and there IS a democrat in the White House
23 posted on 03/06/2002 12:54:55 PM PST by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
You evolutionists must be democrats to be so stupid, I am not joking

Having a bad day, Race? Someone pee in your Wheaties? Lighten up bud.

24 posted on 03/06/2002 12:55:01 PM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Ten to one it's not really a transitional® fossil.
25 posted on 03/06/2002 12:55:15 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motexva
In all seriousness (unlike the last post of mine), you are absolutley correct. If memory serves me, it was a rather lame attempt.
26 posted on 03/06/2002 12:55:33 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Science fact of the day bump.
27 posted on 03/06/2002 12:58:46 PM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
A dinosaur could easily have had feathers for insulation, but not flight feathers. Gigantic difference; the one could not plausibly evolve from the other. The evidence appears to indicate, however, that the one might have been re-engineered from the other.
28 posted on 03/06/2002 1:00:07 PM PST by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
BUMP
29 posted on 03/06/2002 1:01:26 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: medved
A dinosaur could easily have had feathers for insulation, but not flight feathers.

like...um penguins or ostriches?

30 posted on 03/06/2002 1:02:28 PM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
why are you pinging by sex?
31 posted on 03/06/2002 1:03:20 PM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Damn. All this time we've been envisioning giant grotesque lizards and they turn out to be like giant versions of the Philadelphia Mummers.
32 posted on 03/06/2002 1:08:24 PM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
why are you pinging by sex?

No particular reason. Why are you nervous about it?

33 posted on 03/06/2002 1:08:52 PM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

34 posted on 03/06/2002 1:09:40 PM PST by Doomonyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
they turn out to be like giant versions of the Philadelphia Mummers.

I'm thinking forty foot ostriches with bad attitudes.

35 posted on 03/06/2002 1:09:51 PM PST by CholeraJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy;CholeraJoe
I wondered that too
36 posted on 03/06/2002 1:10:37 PM PST by TxBec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
A creature that might have feathers on it's tail...about 3 feet long....there is NO chain of evidence it evolved from anything, nor is there any chain of evidence anything evolved from IT either !!

Hmmm? What's so hard to imagine about feathers on a long, bony tail? We've been finding those since the 1860s.


37 posted on 03/06/2002 1:12:10 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
It's probably a good thing that they are extinct. Can you imagine the problems cleaning your car of dinosaur crap after it sat in the sun all day. Whew!
38 posted on 03/06/2002 1:13:38 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
We have albino peafowl here at a local zoo.
39 posted on 03/06/2002 1:15:32 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: blam
Ping.
40 posted on 03/06/2002 1:16:18 PM PST by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson