Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSSIA'S SINGLE-RATE TAX ^ | 03.01.02 | Deroy Murdock

Posted on 03/02/2002 12:39:49 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist

Opinions: DEROY MURDOCK: Russia's single-rate tax

Copyright © 2002
Scripps Howard News Service

NEW YORK (March 1, 2002 8:37 a.m. EST) - Once again, American taxpayers are struggling to complete their tax returns. They will pay accountants and attorneys about $140 billion this year to generate paperwork to accompany their checks to the IRS. The 46,900-page U.S. Tax Code governs the whole process, with enough loopholes to lasso a light breeze.

Too bad this isn't Russia. Since Jan. 1, 2001, Russians have enjoyed a 13 percent flat tax.

That's right. The once-Communist superpower now stands to the right of publisher Steve Forbes on taxes. The former GOP presidential contender staunchly advocates a 17 percent flat tax.

Sometimes philosophical seeds fall on interesting ground, Forbes says. After Marxism, which was the philosophical equivalent of the IRS code, something understandable has obvious appeal.

The old Russian system featured three income tax rates: 12 percent, 20 percent and 30 percent. The top rate kicked in at the ruble equivalent of $5,000 in taxable income. In contrast, the U.S. has six tax rates: 10 percent, 15 percent, 27 percent, 30 percent, 35 percent and 38.6 percent, the last of which takes hold at $307,500 for married couples filing jointly.

Russia's single-rate tax is reasonable and comprehensible. Most important, the Russian government no longer uses graduated tax brackets to punish those whose incomes improve. Americans should be so lucky.

After just one year, the results of this law already look positive. As Hoover Institution scholar Alvin Rabushka observes in a Feb. 21 analysis for, the 13 percent flat tax has exceeded the expectations of the government in terms of revenue. For the vast majority of taxpayers, its implementation is simple, and no forms need to be filed. Adjusting for currency fluctuations, Rabushka adds, real ruble revenues increased about 28 percent.

This initiative is establishing the custom of paying taxes in Russia, senior Duma member Dr. Konstantin Remchukov told me over lunch last fall. It's greatly simplified everything. He says that three years ago, tax revenue equaled 9 percent to 10 percent of Russian GDP. By last November, that number had grown to 16 percent. This follows the supply-side Laffer Curve: Lower marginal tax rates produce higher revenues as both new and previously-concealed economic activities enter the tax base. No wonder Russia's GDP grew 5 percent in 2001.

There was a huge, monstrous non-compliance problem with the old system, says Richard Vedder, an Ohio University economics professor and board member of the National Taxpayers Union. People essentially operated in the underground economy. There were a lot of payments in kind where people were not paid in cash but in goods to facilitate tax evasion. That problem, from what I understand, has not totally disappeared but has dramatically declined in the last year or two.

Beyond the flat tax, President Vladimir Putin has signed legislation to chop the corporate tax from 35 percent to 24 percent, effective last Jan. 1. Putin hurled the double taxation of corporate income onto the ash heap of history. The Kremlin also may offer Russians privately-invested social security accounts, much as President Bush wants for Americans. Thanks to actual and potential reforms, Putin expects the average Russian to be happy by 2010.

In two former Soviet socialist republics, meanwhile, flat-rate taxes fuel progress. Since 1994, Estonia has had a flat tax of 26 percent while Latvia has enjoyed a 25 percent flat tax since 1995. Both have stimulated growth and higher revenues.

While ex-Communist states confidently reject progressive taxation, America remains plagued by Marxian class-warfare rhetoric. A May 28, 2000, New York Times editorial praised the Russian flat tax's promise to reduce political corruption, removing layers of subsidies in the code that officials like to shower on favored constituents. However, the previous Oct. 30, Republicans for a U.S. flat tax were disingenuous, when the basic result would ease the tax burden on the super-rich, the Gray Old Lady screeched, her dainty fist clenched overhead.

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., complained Jan. 4 that Republicans have one unchanging, unyielding solution that they offer for every problem: tax cuts that go disproportionately to the most affluent.

Analyzing all this from his dacha in Hell, V.I. Lenin must be stroking his beard in utter bewilderment.

Of course, the country that Lenin once misruled still must do plenty to unravel his legacy. Stronger private property rights, a rule of law and full respect for free speech are sorely needed. But with its 13 percent flat tax, Russia now has a far more impressive export than those interlocking, wooden matrioschka dolls.

New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a Senior Fellow with the Atlas Economic Research Foundation in Fairfax, Va.

TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
1 posted on 03/02/2002 12:39:49 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
2 posted on 03/02/2002 12:40:00 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
3 posted on 03/02/2002 12:50:47 PM PST by tomakaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And Chile, Mexico and Great Britain have allowed all or some privatization of Social Security. We're way behind. Pretty soon, we'll be able to turn liberals favorite tune back on them, "Every progressive, civilized industrialized country in the Western World has a flat tax and a privatized pension plan."
4 posted on 03/02/2002 12:57:28 PM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Kinda makes us look like the banana republic now. Our tax/revenue system is sick...bloated...perverted...corrupt..etc. It's amazing to me that Russia of all countries has such a vastly superior tax sytem.
5 posted on 03/02/2002 1:00:24 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hove
And the Russian women have careers in nuclear physics and such too.....
6 posted on 03/02/2002 1:02:26 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
LOL......we are more communist now than the "former" Soviet Union!!!! You GO RUSSIA! They are seeing much new investment. DAMN! We need a 13% flat tax HERE!!! I wish the media would tell us about the Hong Kong thats a story.....the only thing HK gets for free is air.....they have to pay China for water and to take their natural resources....they have to import everthing.....and their economic miracle came because they attracted investment with their tax system.
7 posted on 03/02/2002 1:09:49 PM PST by BlackJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Attention FReepers: We interrupt this thread for a brief announcement regarding our sponsor:

It's FReepathon Time!

A Freepathon Cheer

Bump, bump, bump this thread!
Give, give, give some bread!
Bump this thread
Give some bread
Let's FReep till we're dead!

Thank you. We now return you to your regular postings.

8 posted on 03/02/2002 1:11:50 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
all this proves is that Senator Daschle is a GOOD communist :) !!!!
10 posted on 03/02/2002 1:18:07 PM PST by Nat Turner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
>Since Jan. 1, 2001, Russians have enjoyed a 13 percent flat tax.

So what? Would any country want to pattern itself on a third world dirt hole like Russia? (Isn't the Russian GNP something lower than Norway's?!)

If you're the kind of person who likes looking at how other people do things, at least look at other people who are thriving. If you think the US has a lot to fill out, here, for instance, is how the Japanese do it. Principles of the Japanese Income Tax System.

Mark W.

11 posted on 03/02/2002 1:26:45 PM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar, all
>(Isn't the Russian GNP something lower than Norway's?!)

I don't know about Norway, but if anyone wants to see how pathetic Russia is doing, check out the numbers from the WorldBank (Pacific Basin Economic Council). Russia's GDP and GNP are only about 50% of what Canada (!) is doing. Russia is doing worse than Australia!

This is NOT an economy the US wants to pant after and emulate!

Mark W.

12 posted on 03/02/2002 1:40:59 PM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hove
The only reason America is surviving all this economic, political, and cultural abuse is because it is such a strong country to begin with, with such creative, independent people who can think for themselves. Strong people can stand up under more such abuse than weak ones. But at some point, if there is no change of course, the system will break.
13 posted on 03/02/2002 1:44:04 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar, all
>(Isn't the Russian GNP something lower than Norway's?!)

Hey, and while you're looking at the GDP numbers for Russia, check out these GNP PER CAPITA numbers (second column) World Bank PACIFIC BASIN ECONOMIC COUNCIL

The Russian people are generating less money per person than the people in PERU for God's sake!

The only reason the Establishment doesn't want to tax those poor suckers is because those poor suckers have no money left to tax. (Don't worry -- soon enough the same dynamic will be at work in the Western World...)

Mark W.

14 posted on 03/02/2002 1:48:26 PM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
As long as there is more than one rate, the principle of eating the rich has been admitted, even if the rates are 1%, 2%, and 3%. In 1913, the highest rate envisioned by "reasonable" and "non-alarmist" people was 7%. Those who proposed putting a limit of 10% into the Sixteenth Amendment were mocked as hysterics (by those who intended to rape the rich in a few short years). EVERY tax cut can always be stigmatized as "favoring the rich," and the door is always open, even if only a crack, for a demagogue to push the top rates into the 90% range.

Does anyone else recall that when Bush mentioned, at the high school in Crawford, that Russia has a flat income tax, that the gym full of HIGH SCHOOL KIDS cheered?!?!?

15 posted on 03/02/2002 2:16:48 PM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
We need a flat tax here. The irony that the Russians have it and we don't is incredible. Too bad that most Americans are so dumbed down that they can't see that we are following the path of the failed socialist policies of Europe that even they are pulling away from!
16 posted on 03/02/2002 4:08:09 PM PST by austingirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
Now add to that an average growth rate of 6% GDP + and even higher in specific markets like agriculture and oil and ask youself, just how long it will take before it surpresses all of them. But you are a famous Russian hater so all you see is the down side. With people like you in charge, Japan, Germany, S. Korea would still be post war pissholes.
17 posted on 03/02/2002 6:11:10 PM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
Here Marki, read and learn...if you can.
18 posted on 03/02/2002 6:46:39 PM PST by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stavka2
>But you are a famous Russian hater ...
>Putin's Progress...

"Russian hater?" [shrugs] Hate schmate. My Dad was born there. I don't hate the place. But I sure as hell don't want to see here turned into there.

Well, why would the West care whether Putin is making progress or not? Just because of the nuclear bomb thing? Contrary to the whole MAD philosophy the Established embraced for a while, everyone in the West (except maybe Laura Dern) has always known there's more to life than fear of bombs.

Until the society over there becomes, say, a little more productive than Peru -- to name just one benchmark -- they should be even more marginalized than they are.

Mark W.

19 posted on 03/03/2002 10:17:26 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

But with its 13 percent flat tax, Russia now has a far more impressive export than those interlocking, wooden matrioschka dolls.

Seems the Russians have been learning from the Europeans and our Congress Critters on how to out fox the electorate:


August 10, 2000


Alexander Chmelev and Evgeny Astakhov

Baker & McKenzie, Moscow Office


Sent by BISNIS, U.S. Department of Commerce,, Tel: 202-482-2293.  BISNIS sends this report as a courtesy to the U.S. business community. This is not to be construed as endorsement or sponsorship of any information or group.


On August 5, 2000, Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin signed into law four chapters of Part Two of the Russian Federation Tax Code and Federal Law No. 118-FZ ôOn the Implementation of Part Two of the Russian Federation Tax Code and Amendments to Certain Federal Laws on Taxationö (the ôImplementation Lawö).  The chapters of the Tax Code signed into law by the President are Chapter 21 - VAT, Chapter 22 - Excise Taxes, Chapter 23 - Personal Income Tax, and Chapter 24 - Unified Social Tax.  These four Chapters and the Implementation Law were officially published in Rossijskaya Gazeta on August 10, 2000, and, with few exceptions, will become effective on January 1, 2001.


The most sweeping changes introduced into the Russian tax system by this new legislation are as follows:


1.         VAT (Chapter 21 of the Tax Code)


Although Chapter 21 of the Tax Code does not change VAT rates or the general VAT structure, it contains numerous provisions, which will significantly affect most businesses in Russia.  Most notably, Chapter 21 substantially modifies the ôplace of serviceö rules, which generally determine whether for VAT purposes a particular transaction has occurred in Russia and is, therefore, subject to Russian VAT.  Effective from July 1, 2001, Chapter 21 also will treat export sales to CIS countries in the same way as sales to all other foreign countries, and will exempt them from VAT.  On the downside, Chapter 21 will repeal a number of long-standing and important VAT exemptions, including an exemption for license fees for the use of intellectual property (such as, patents, copyrights, and trademarks), and will significantly narrow the VAT exemption for pharmaceuticals.


2.         Personal Income Tax (Chapter 23 of the Tax Code)


Chapter 23 of the Tax Code will replace the current progressive tax rates ranging from 12% to 30% with a flat tax rate of 13%.  This 13% rate will apply to almost all categories of income earned by individuals who are Russian tax resident.  A 30% rate will apply to dividends, and to any Russian source income received by individuals who are not Russian tax resident.  A 35% rate will apply to income from gambling, lottery prizes, deemed income from low-interest or interest-free loans, certain insurance payments, and excessive bank interest.


3.         Unified Social Tax (Chapter 24 of the Tax Code)


Chapter 24 of the Tax Code will replace the existing employersÆ contributions to four separate social benefit funds (which currently are imposed at an over-all rate of 38.5%) with one unified social tax.  This unified social tax will have a regressive tax scale from 35.6% to 2% of an employeeÆs salary with the lowest rate applicable to the portion of an employeeÆs annual salary in excess of 600,000 Rubles (approximately US$22,000 at the current exchange rate). It should be noted that under the Implementation Law, as a transition rule, the lower rate of this tax will be 5% rather than 2% during 2001.


4.         Excise Taxes (Chapter 22 of the Tax Code)


As a countermeasure to reducing rates of other federal taxes, Chapter 22 of the Tax Code provides for an increase in excise tax rates for gasoline and other oil products by almost 300%.  It also provides for a less dramatic increase of excise tax rates for tobacco products and certain passenger cars.


5.         The Implementation Law


a.         Turnover Taxes


Effective from January 1, 2001, the Implementation Law repeals the Housing Fund Tax of 1.5% and reduces the Road Users Tax from 2.5% down to 1% and completely repeals the Road Users Tax effective January 1, 2003.   These taxes are imposed on gross sales and have been among the most onerous taxes on business in Russia. 


b.         Regional Tax Concessions


The Implementation Law reconfirms the right of regional authorities to provide tax exemptions for the regional portion of federal taxes retroactive to April 1, 1999. This reconfirmation resolves an issue that arose in 1999 as to whether the regional portion of profits taxes could be reduced pursuant to regional incentive laws.


c.         Profits Tax Rate


Apparently in compensation to local budgets for the cancellation of turnover taxes, the Implementation Law authorizes municipal governments to introduce an additional ômunicipalö profits tax of up to 5% of a taxpayerÆs taxable profits.  Thus the maximum overall profits tax rate may be increased from 30% to 35%.


* * * * *


Needless to say that with the introduction of Part Two of the Tax Code, both Russian domestic businesses and foreign investors will experience the most sweeping and positive changes in the Russian tax system since the beginning of Russian economic reforms in the early 1990s.  It remains to be seen, however, how efficiently this new legislation will be enforced and administered and to carefully plan against traps for the unwary that can be found in this new legislation.  In addition, with such significant tax reform, and the expected movement on the Tax Code proposals on profits tax, tax planning by all companies in Russia will now need to be reassessed. We will continue to monitor this matter, and we will inform you with new Legal Alerts of any further developments.



Questions regarding the above matters can be addressed to either Alexander Chmelev, tax partner, or Evgeny Astakhov, senior tax associate, in the Moscow Office at +7 (095) 230-6036, or James Hitch, Managing Partner, or Yulia Smolina, tax specialist, in the St. Petersburg Office at +7 (812) 325-8308.


Baker & McKenzie issues this LEGAL ALERT to inform clients and other interested parties of time-sensitive legal developments that may affect or otherwise be of special interest to them.  The comments above do not constitute legal advice or opinion, and should not be regarded as a substitute for detailed advice in individual cases.

This report is provided courtesy of the Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States (BISNIS)

20 posted on 03/05/2002 12:27:23 PM PST by ancient_geezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson