Skip to comments.
‘It Isn’t Over Yet’:SDPD Chief Bejarano talks about latest developments in van Dam Case
Newsweek-Website ^
| March 1, 2002
| NEWSWEEK WEB EXCLUSIVE
Posted on 03/01/2002 7:36:24 AM PST by FresnoDA
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:01 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 721 next last
To: meadsjn
You're right, something smells here. Initial reports of material removed from DW's house revealed that there was some porn, but no child porn. Now they seem to be pushing the description to tighten up their case. Wrong! He has also been charged with possession of child pornography.
101
posted on
03/01/2002 8:48:28 AM PST
by
Valpal1
To: Demidog
DD, we all know that you think the parents are ALWAYS right now matter how dead or injured their kids end up, and that the government is ALWAYS wrong to suspect them. Yaddayadda.
I'm waiting for you to say that the government killed the Yates children.
102
posted on
03/01/2002 8:48:47 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: GSWarrior
Chandra Levy consented to being murdered? Quit playing semantic games. If you sleep with wolves, don't be surprised when you wake up and discover that you're being eaten for breakfast.
To: wasp69
Or to save even more time, read post #98!!! FresnoDA
To: GSWarrior
They were both consenting legal adults.Yes, but the liberals still turned there daughter over to a known molester.
To: FresnoDA
Yep, Feldman's defense is going to be
/1/ Attack the "trace" DNA as suspect a la OJ.
/2/ Point out the DOZENS of old swingers who could have come in and grabbed Danielle.
To: Cu Roi
I have had the feeling that her parents were involved since before the news came out about their lifestyle. There's something not quite right about them. I know they probably are not used to talking in front of a camera or being interviewed, but they act very fake. I instinctively don't trust them.
To: Cu Roi
So parents allowing their priest to interact with their children is EXACTLY the same as parents allowing their swinging partner to interact with their children?
Did I get that right?
108
posted on
03/01/2002 8:51:21 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: Uni-Poster
Your questions are the same things I have been wondering about. The child's bedroom was upstairs and from the pictures in the news, the windows did not look very large. I wonder just how this man got into that house to steal the child and without anyone hearing anything?
It makes me wonder a) did Westerfield sneak into the house to get the child as an action for revenge for some reason? and b) is the reason that no one heard anything because they were locked in the garage having one of the swinging events that they are accused of having? Something is really odd here.
To: Jodi
The speculation and rumor-mongering regarding this horrific story does not reflect well onto this website, jmho...Trust me, it's not 10% of what is being said every hour on talk radio in San Diego.
If the VDs are not swingers, they are going to OWN several radio stations for libel and slander when this is over.
But they deny nothing, nothing, they just evade and hide behind PR flacks.
To: Slip18
"I still don't get this, Travis: The dog didn't bark and Danielle's brothers didn't wake up."Unless the perp was known to the family and the dog. Mrs. VD lied about dancing with Westerfield. What else might she be concealing?
To: lady lawyer
"Ye cannot serve two masters," Sis. LL.
112
posted on
03/01/2002 8:54:58 AM PST
by
Illbay
To: Travis McGee; all
Stop being on Travis' case! He's a father who cares! He sees discrepancies in the parents actions and their PR.
The facts are this:
1. The VD's did not check on their children for 11 hours.
2. It has been established that the VD's are sexual swingers.
3. The alarm went off twice, father nor mother checked on children when the alarm went off. They have said so in the press.
4. The mother brought home strangers, allegedly to have sex with, possibly do drugs with.
5. The father, joined them at 2:30 a.m. when mother brought home the strangers. Again, allegedly, to have sex.
6. The mother is very concerned about her appearance on television.
7. The parents hired a public relations firm a la the Ramsey's.
8. Westerfield, their neighbor, and the one charged with the crime, might have had sexual relations with the mother.
To: Uni-Poster
BillO'Reilly will be airing a special on the Fox network this month I believe on the corruption of children. Says he has been working on it for months.
He was really exercised about the Yates and van Dam cases last night. Blasted Ashcroft for not doing more to crack down on kiddie porn sites.
We as a society are further down the slippery slope that is leading to our ruination. Even on this thread we are admonished not to judge the parents. If not us, then who? Do we wait around until pedophilia and child murder for sex becomes just another lifestyle choice? Then scratch our heads and say "how the hell did that happen?
114
posted on
03/01/2002 8:55:08 AM PST
by
yikes
Comment #115 Removed by Moderator
To: Travis McGee
Pure HorseHillary,and you know it! Travis,I'm really dissapointed to see you wrote this. I expected more from you.
To: dsb
Let me put it another way. If you don't like the thread, why did you click on it? There are lots of other threads.
To: BlessedBeGod
There were numerous Freep Reports, of those with live satellite feeds, that off camera on the Larry King show, Brenda VD was heard asking, "Who did the book deal for the Ramsey's? Can we get the name?"
Can someone dig up the link to those posts??? Sorry, I am buried with other projects......:0)
If that is correct, then I agree that Damon and Brenda VD's priorities were slightly skewed, from the get go!!!!
To: craigoethe
Anger is commonly felt. Months after the death of my son, I would find myself suddenly smashing my fist into walls and other inanimate objects in reaction to that emotion. Inexpressible sadness, bewilderment, and guilt are also present.
Freepers, for your own sake and for Danielle's sake, for now at least focus on compassion and prayer. If it's warranted, there will be time enough for recriminations when the facts come out at trial.
To: Illbay
So parents allowing their priest to interact with their children is EXACTLY the same as parents allowing their swiging partner to interact with their children?As a Christian parent, I would not let my children be alone with any adult in circumstances that could even lead to accusations. Its not prudent for my child.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 721 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson