When does it become world government?

WorldNetDaily / Commentary | February 23, 2002 | Henry Lamb

[George Frm Br00klyn Park]

WorldNetDaily / Commentary

Henry Lamb
When does it become world government?

Posted: February 23, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

There are certain similarities between Hitler’s quest for global dominance and the U.N.'s quest for global governance:

• Hitler dreamed his dream long before the rest of the world was aware of it.
• Hitler gathered around him an inner-circle of trusted, like-minded individuals.
• Hitler consolidated his power base before expanding outward.
• Hitler achieved his goals – until he confronted the United States.

World government was an articulated dream a century ago. It was the United States that foiled the first effort – the League of Nations. The world government dreamers, however, gained control of the U.S. government after the Great Depression and created a second effort to achieve world government, the United Nations.

Since 1945, the dreamers within the United Nations have been gathering like-minded individuals and consolidating their power base. The outward expansion began about a decade ago, when the U.N.'s forces began mobilizing through an unprecedented series of world conferences:

• on children, New York (1990);
• on the environment, Rio de Janeiro (1992);
• on human rights, Vienna (1993);
• on world trade, Uruguay (1994);
• on world population, Cairo (1994);
• on social development, Copenhagen (1995);
• on sustainable development, New York (1995);
• on women, Beijing (1995);
• on human settlements, Istanbul (1996);
• on global warming, Geneva (1996);
• on the International Criminal Court, Rome (1998); and
• on to the Millennium Assembly and Summit in 2000.

The U.N.-funded Commission on Global Governance convened in 1993, and in 1995, made public a detailed plan to achieve world government with the U.N. at the helm. No one paid much attention.

No one paid much attention to Hitler either, until the spring of 1938, when the Third Reich annexed Austria. Three days after Hitler invaded Poland, in the fall of 1939, Britain declared war on Germany and the United States began paying attention.

In the comparison to Hitler, world government is somewhere between Austria and Poland. The U.N. made its intentions known with the publication of the CGG report, "Our Global Neighborhood," just as Hitler made his intentions known when German forces first entered Austria.

When the United Nations gains independent financing and frees itself from dependence upon the United States, it will have invaded Poland, so to speak.

The CGG report is quite specific in its plan to achieve independent financing for the U.N. It calls for consolidation of all international financial and development institutions, under the administrative arm of the U.N. It calls for global taxation on currency exchange, fossil fuels and a host of other targets.

The 2000 Millennium Summit endorsed these ideas in very generalized language in its Millennium Declaration. A special High Level Panel on Financing for Developmentwas created. A preliminary report issued by the panel's chairman last September embodied all the recommendations of the CGG and the Millennium Declaration.

The panel's final draft report, issued recently, has softened the language considerably, but still embraces the themes of the CGG report. This special panel is also calling for its own continuation as a perpetual institution to continue working toward the CGG goals.

Sooner or later the U.N. will achieve independent financing, unless the United States realizes the danger and takes action now to stop it. If we again procrastinate and put our trust in idle hope, it may take as much effort to defeat world government as it did to defeat Nazi Germany.

There are also differences between Hitler's means and those of the U.N. Hitler used bombs and bullets; the U.N. uses propaganda and persuasion. Hitler gave his soldiers much weaponry and little pay; the U.N. pays their soldiers well and makes up for deficient armaments by bloating the bureaucracy.

Hitler's army bit off more than it could chew when it encountered the United States. This too, could be a difference. It is not at all clear that the United States is still willing to defend its sovereignty, as many Americans cannot believe that the U.N. seeks to conquer the world.

With each new U.N. treaty and world conference, the U.N. expands its sphere of influence and consolidates a little more power. Austria, Poland, Belgium, France – when did it become world war? The U.N., UNESCO, ECOSOC, WTO, ICC, IPCC, UNEP, UNDP, UNICEF, IPO, WIPO, UNHCR, UNFCCC, UNCBD, MAB, CITES, RAMSAR ... when does it become world government?

Henry Lamb: henry@freedom.org, is the executive vice president of the Environmental Conservation Organization and chairman of Sovereignty International.

THIS Article at WND

[TEXICAN II]

Charge, sir? I wonder not so much at your charge, but more at your purpose. Strange that mindless conspiracy nuts pose such a threat to you. Stranger still that your time is suddenly occupied with cruising these crazy threads, in search of fools who need correcting. Just what is your real purpose here? With all due respect, who asked you to attempt to insult people who gave you none?

[TEXICAN II]

Really, this was addressed to the moderator, but the system won't let me!

Well, 22 was a bit unpleasant, but surely no harm was intended? It was an interesting physics question-for small minds like mine. But, then again, you might keep all of us focused on a higher plane & we should appreciate your careful attention. Gosh, I hope someone's feelings were not hurt!?! Oh, the pain of insult! I shall try my very best to make nice to all who are on the thread! I would just hate myself if I hurt anyone's feelings.

[TEXICAN II]

Perhaps some folks have such sensitivities, they should not be exposed to any insult or slander. They should not go out in public, alone, without someone to protect them. They might better stay home & read the New York Times or the Washington Post. That would be safer!

[Asclepius]

... I wonder not so much at your charge, but more at your purpose ...

Why wonder at all?

[TEXICAN II]

One UN tax conference topic is to 'restrain tax competition'! Hey I am soo glad they will not fight over my dead body-they will leave me enough food, water & oxygen to keep on working & producing for them. It would be so funny, if it were only a farce. I have come to the conclusion that this is the only question left for government-tweaking taxation so as to extract the most taxes. All of government is reduced to the issues of control & taxation. All they do is to that end. Surely, at some point, push will come to shove. But then I recall the Chinese, who have in fact been under virtually total subjugation, on & off, for centuries.

[Libertina]

Thanks for posting this article. Henry Lamb is a well researched journalist and rigth on target with his UN warnings... not that anyone is listening or taking him seriously. (To their detriment.) The audacity of the UN to announce WORLD TAX - is breathtaking. And many times to pave the way they use one of their NGO mouthpieces to "pave the way." First people pooh pooh the idea. Next they say "Oh I've heard of that before." The communists tried to keep people in place with threats and ideology. Our intended "slave owners" have succeeded by keeping us fat, lethargic, and entertained. It seems to be working like a dream. Only a few are left on the watch tower.

[TEXICAN II]

The case of Michael New may well be the first of many, larger, more serious prob's for those idiots who would attempt to force our military to wear UN blue. They have, no doubt, made some careful plans to avoid all future 'refuseniks'. I am sure many more Americans will politely decline the offer of blue hats, patches & leaders in blue. A very real problem for future UN operations. Just like the Constitution & Bill of Rights. Wanna-be world leaders still have tens of millions of US citizens who think that we are still free-& we have guns! Now that is a sticky problem. Kofi, 'Better to just tax 'em to death'.

[TEXICAN II]

NGO's are the new major tool-even at the local level, they are a fine way around either legislative, judicial or public opinion impediments to the desired plan. They can get you anything from a sports stadium to mass transit to what ever you may wish.

[ValenB4]

The only way world government can work is if it's on something similar to the American model. But that's going to require everyone else catching up to the American level of freedom and achievement, not the US abrogating it's position and lowering itself to their level of mediocrity (Western Europe), tyranny (China), or utter failure (the entire Third World). If other countries can get their acts together in 50 years or so, then maybe something can be arranged. In the meantime, forget it.

However, there are signs that Western Europe may be in the beginnings of a generational change that is more to the Right. Maybe something can be arranged with them in the future.

[hedgetrimmer]

Constitution Day Speech

The Council of Global Governance met at the UN in New York City in September 2000 to consider ways to amend the U.N. Charter with 12 principles to complete the abolition of individual freedoms and erode if not overthrow of Constitutional government, as we know it and as intended under the Constitution.

How many of these have been accomplished?

Principle# 1) ' Calls for the consolidation of all international agencies under the direct U.N. authority.
Principle #2) call for regulation by the UN of all transnational corporations and financial institutions, requiring an" International Code of Conduct '" concerning environment and labor standards
Principle #3) demands an independent source of revenue for UN, such as Tobin tax, taxes on aircraft and shipping fuels and licensing of "Global Commons:. Global Commons being defined as "outer space" atmosphere, non-territorial seas and related environment that supports life.
Principle #4) eliminates veto power and permanent membership status on Security Counsel
Principle # 5) authorizes a standing UN army
Principle #6) requires UN registration of all arms and the reduction of all national armies as" part of a multilateral global security system" under the authority of the UN.
Principle # 7) Principle requires individual and national compliance with all UN " Human Rights " treaties and declarations.
Principle #8) activate the International Criminal Court, make the International Court of Justice compulsory for all nations and give individuals the right to petition courts to remedy social justice.
Principle # 9) calls for a new institution to establish economic and environmental security by insuring "sustainable development"'
Principle 10) calls for the establishment of an International Environmental Court
Principle 11) calls for a declaration that climate change is an essential global security interest that requires the creation of a "high-level action team" to allocate carbon emission based on equal per-capita rights
Principle 12) calls for the cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions, and for "equitable sharing of global resources" as allocated by the United Nations"(A Global Governance goal is a check for every living human on the face of the earth) Guess who's to pay?

[TEXICAN II]

Europe is changing all right! The Eu is pee-you! Home for the Greeny Weenies, Marxists, idiots of every stripe & hue. One currency, the same old powers behind the thrones & what sort of crazy deal is this? They are sure changing!

[TEXICAN II]

Oh you just made that up! Stop trying to scare me! I know its just a spoof. Tell Mr. acidlips & Dave the Big S, you are only kidding-they are worried about this stuff & folks who really might believe it-please.

[Ohioan]

Does the UN website offer a defense of invalid inference?

Well, isn't that a nice begging of the question? Did anyone in history, seeking greater power over others, ever characterize his own pursuit as invalid--or for that matter immoral, evil, or anything other than glorious and idealistic?

The U.N., with the full blessing of the loathsome American State Department policy under Dean Rusk, who should have been tried for treason, crossed the line beyond any possible justification, in 1961, when it became the vehicle for forcing the people of Katanga back under the Central Congo Government. It has never since accepted the limitations on its function, as originally sold to the world.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

[timestax]

It becomes World government next week!!

[TEXICAN II]

A better question, perhaps-will UN troops ( German, French, Indonesian, etc ), on my front porch, or in my town square, eat hot lead?

[Pistias]

It was the United States that foiled the first effort – the League of Nations.

Wasn't it one part of the US (the executive) that started it and another (the Senate) that stopped it?

[Libertina]

NGO's are the new major tool-even at the local level
Like the "Blue-Ribbon" Panels convened to "come up with" precisely the "answer" the pol wants, so he can then enact his agenda but declare "It wasn't my idea." It just seems to me that when ANY country gets too big, things go massively awry. Can any of us, even if we are diligent 24/7, keep on top of what our pols are doing? What "helpful" agencies are up to? Yet if we aren't diligent, look what they succeed in perpetrating on us!

[Eustace]

The UN is a creation of the worlds elites. The group of American elites who somewhere around 1950 became the CFR, are an extension of Englands Bilderbergers.

The UN is plain and simple one of the elites tools for creating world rule.

But I believe people are making a mistake concentrating on the UN as the only tool, when it is protected, armed and funded by our government (meaning us).

Mentioning Hitlers quest is interesting, seeings how our government sold us over to the bankers who funded Hitler, in 1913 when they signed the federal reserve act.

The federal reserve is a privately owned central bank. These bankers caused the first depression within just 16 years of operations. Plus all the "recessions" since gaining more power and property.

This leaves out the American's who also funded Hitler, like Rockefeller who sold him oil without which he couldn't have kept the war going. And Henery Ford who would give Hitler $10,000 on his birthdays.

By the way, both Rockefeller and Ford killed unarmed American men, women and children who refused to work their mines.

It really is a small world for the rich, who want to rule it, no matter how many of us have to die.

Innocent unarmed men, women and children are still being killed around the world to achieve this goal. And believe it or not it's our government doing it, as American's turn their head and look the other way. Evidently hoping they won't be touched by the horror.

But we will be touched and we will know the horror that these people know, when it's our turn.

Innocent men, women and children in Waco were burned alive, needlessly. Randy Weaver's wife was killed while holding her baby by an FBI sniper. Because Randy was tricked into sawing off the barrel of a shotgun for a friend of his (who happened to be an undercover FBI agent) it took seven years of taxpayers money to get it done. It would have been "Legal" if Randy would have purchased the $500 FFL.

Individuals who can think for themselves are not wanted in the new order.

Soon we will be going into another depression(purposely). Mike Montagne of People for Perfect Economy says it is mathmetically impossible to stop the depression. SEE FOR YOURSELF

You think it can't be done this easily. Well it's been coming for a long time. In the 50's our government began silencing our churches, by fooling them into "incorporation". Now churches believing that their tax exempt status comes from the State, are effectively silenced by only being allowed to spout the "policy of the day". Instead of holding their tax free status in the air for all to see, because the government doesn't have any power over our Churches.

Incorporation goes back before 600BC in Greece, but Rome perfected it, it was called "Licit" in Ceasar's days.

GIVE UNTO CAESAR!

Christians were persecuted in Rome, not because they worshipped Christ, but because they refused to get a license from Ceasar to do it. In Rome you could worship a rock if you wanted, as long as Ceasar got his cut.

I used to go to a Lutheran Church, I was Baptised there 4 Easter's ago. A very special day for me, for obvious reasons.

I quit going to that Church when during a class the pastor said that only the government has the right to carry the sword, and to be sure and pay all of our taxes.

God hasn't appointed governments since the Old Testament, we are suffering from centuries of mans control and mans corrupt laws.

Incorporation, see for yourself

We will continue to fall into world rule as long as we put mans laws above Gods' Laws.

And for all of you who believe Bush is our saviour, let's hear from his dad.

On February 1,1992, President George Herbert Walker Bush stated: "It is my vision of a New World Order that forsees the UN with a revitalized peace keeping function. It is the sacred principles enshrined in the UN charter to which we henceforth pledge our allegiance."

You have my word on it, there is nothing sacred about the UN, at least not to the God I worship. And I'll bet my paycheck that "we" aren't included in Bush's pledge of allegiance.

The same international banking families who ran the banks of Germany, France and England still own the controlling stocks of the federal reserve. You think 1913, boy that was a long time ago. Okay let me take You to 1950, so You can hear what the son of Paul Warburg has to say.

James Paul Warburg (son of Paul Moritz Warburg, chief architect of the federal reserve act) boasted confidently on February 17, 1950 before the U.S. Senate: "We shall have World government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

These internationalists are very brave when we do the fighting for them. But bring them into Gods' Light and they will crumble.

How do we do it? Simply hold our politicians to Gods' Laws and accept no less.

There's a saying I can't remember exactly but this will do "The amount of government abuse that will be used against their people, is the amount of abuse the people will accept.

There was a very good reason why Christ threw the moneychangers tables over in front of the Temples. We were given Free Will by Christ to do the Right Things. The moneychangers control our Churches again and they have given the FBI permission to spy on them.

What does it take before we stand up as American's and say "ENOUGH!" ?.

Peace