Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Astronaut Aldrin, Purdue Engineers Planning Mars Hotels
Purdue University ^ | Wednesday, February 06, 2002 FR Post 02-20-02 | Science Daily Editorial Staff

Posted on 02/20/2002 3:49:11 PM PST by vannrox


Reprinted from ScienceDaily Magazine ...

Source:             Purdue University
Date Posted:    Wednesday, February 06, 2002
Web Address:   http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/02/020206075800.htm


Former Astronaut Aldrin, Purdue Engineers Planning Mars Hotels

WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. — Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the moon, is leading a team of researchers, including engineers at Purdue University, to design a new class of spacecraft that would serve as orbiting hotels perpetually cruising between Earth and Mars.

The "cycler" spacecraft would constantly ferry people and materials between the two planets, enabling earthlings to explore, commercially develop and eventually colonize the Red Planet.

"We believe these regular planetary flybys would create an entirely new economic and philosophic approach to space exploration," the researchers wrote in a December report prepared for NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "Reliable, reusable and dependable cycler transportation can be the key to carry humanity into the next great age of exploration, expansion, settlement and multi-planetary commerce."

Aldrin is working with a team of researchers, including professors and engineering graduate students at Purdue, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Texas. The former astronaut is an engineer by training and holds a doctorate from MIT.

"We are going to put in a proposal for a more detailed study to narrow down some of the choices of the different kinds of cyclers and decide which ones seem to fit into a very nice operational mission," Aldrin said.

Modified versions of the space shuttle's external fuel tank might be used as building units for cyclers. The tank ordinarily is jettisoned during shuttle flights, and it burns up in the atmosphere. However, the shuttle's external fuel tank could be modified, adding two additional empty tanks atop the existing fuel tank. Instead of being jettisoned, the modified external tank assembly could then be carried by the shuttle all the way to low-earth orbit, where the dry tanks could be separated from the main tank and used to construct the spacecraft.

Cyclers would take advantage of the gravitational forces that are exerted by the sun, the planets and their moons, which provide "gravity assists" to passing spacecraft. As a spacecraft travels close to a planet, its flight path is bent, causing it to whip around the planet while boosting its speed. The path is commonly called a "slingshot" trajectory, which enables a spacecraft to achieve the proper speed and heading.

"The cycler essentially is in orbit around the sun and makes regular flybys of Earth and Mars," said team member James Longuski, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at Purdue. "Once you put your vehicle into a cycler orbit, it continues on its own momentum, going back and forth between Earth and Mars. You may need to carry some propellant for an occasional boost, but it's pretty much a free trip after that."

In their report to JPL, researchers said a cycler would practically fly itself and "become a permanent, man-made inner solar system companion of Earth and Mars, tapping the free and inexhaustible 'fuel supply' of gravitational forces to maintain orbit. Like an ocean liner on a regular trade route, a cycler will glide perpetually along its beautifully predictable orbit."

However, it is difficult to precisely design cycler trajectories because of the complex orbital relationship between Earth and Mars as the planets travel around the sun. While the Earth orbits the sun in a nearly circular route, Mars' orbit is oblong, or elliptical. That means the distance between Mars and the Earth varies dramatically depending on Mars' orbital position around the sun, complicating the design of spacecraft trajectories between the two planets.

"If they were both in circular orbits, any cycler that you would design would repeat perfectly over and over again," Longuski said. "Mars' orbit is somewhat eccentric. That throws a curve ball into the whole design."

Determining the precise path for cyclers requires engineers highly skilled in celestial mechanics who use mathematical techniques to create and evaluate numerous possible trajectories, eventually arriving at the best choice. Longuski and his students have previously designed trajectories for an unmanned spacecraft to Jupiter's moon Europa, which is tentatively scheduled for launch in 2006. The team also designed trajectories for a hypothetical manned mission to Mars.

"Some day, people will be going to Mars on a regular basis," Longuski said. "Most people are convinced that we are going to do this; the only question is when."

The cycler spacecraft would have to encounter Mars and Earth at precisely the right distance and speed. If a cycler approached Mars too fast or at the wrong distance, too much fuel would be needed for steering rockets and it would be more difficult for "taxi" spacecraft to dock with the cyclers as they sped by.

A cycler might fly past the Earth at about 21,000 kilometers per hour, or roughly 13,000 miles per hour. Small taxi spacecraft carrying people and supplies would have to rendezvous with the speeding cycler.

"This is sort of like a bus that doesn't stop," Longuski said. "When it comes by, you have to run alongside of it and grab on. "

The outbound trip to Mars would take six to eight months.

"Then, when you get to Mars, you get in the taxi and de-orbit down to the planet," said Longuski, who is working with Purdue graduate students to design "outbound" and "inbound" trajectories, or the trips from Earth to Mars and from Mars to Earth.

"These cyclers would be like space hotels," Longuski said. "They would provide the usual creature comforts."

Cyclers would rotate slowly to create artificial gravity and prevent the debilitating effects of weightlessness on its passengers. The spacecraft also would be roomy enough to make the trip tolerable. The earliest versions of the space hotels might accommodate up to 50 passengers.

One cycler would not be sufficient: By the time that craft arrived at Mars, the two planets would have moved much farther apart, making a return trip impractically long. Rather, a family of perhaps three cyclers, continuously providing outbound and inbound flights, would ensure that passengers could get to Earth and Mars within a reasonable amount of time, Longuski said.

While the Purdue engineers are working on the interplanetary celestial mechanics of getting back and forth between Earth and Mars, researchers at the University of Texas and MIT are helping with other critical aspects of the trip, such as getting a cycler into the proper position to begin its trip to Mars and learning how to design the taxis.

"We have to look at the configuration of those taxis and how much energy will be needed to intercept the cyclers," Aldrin said.

Perhaps the first cyclers could fly around 2018, he said.

"The first mission will be more conservative, and it will have more safety supports until we are sure we know what we are doing," Aldrin said.



Copyright © 1995-2002 ScienceDaily Magazine | Email: editor@sciencedaily.com


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Interesting.
1 posted on 02/20/2002 3:49:11 PM PST by vannrox (MyEMail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Buzz needs a checkup.

Former Astronaut Aldrin, Purdue Engineers Planning Mars Hotels

2 posted on 02/20/2002 4:19:42 PM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The cycler saves you nothing in Delta-Vee (energy). It might save hardware and infrastructure; nothing more. The real problem is putting in the delta-Vee for the mission.

--Boris

3 posted on 02/20/2002 4:25:48 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"The cycler essentially is in orbit around the sun and makes regular flybys of Earth and Mars," said team member James Longuski, a professor of aeronautics and astronautics at Purdue. "Once you put your vehicle into a cycler orbit, it continues on its own momentum, going back and forth between Earth and Mars. You may need to carry some propellant for an occasional boost, but it's pretty much a free trip after that."

Let me expand. This statement is true for the cycler. However, nature will not be short-changed. The total Delta-Vee needed to match orbits (rendezvous) with the cycler and to return to earth from it is the same as if no cycler were used. Possibly even more.

--Boris

4 posted on 02/20/2002 4:27:56 PM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
It's a sound idea. I would wait until the first roundtrip is complete before purchasing a couple of cruise tickets.
5 posted on 02/20/2002 4:31:19 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
The cycler saves you nothing in Delta-Vee (energy). It might save hardware and infrastructure; nothing more. The real problem is putting in the delta-Vee for the mission.

So, ahh, does that mean that the slogan for Aldrin's spacelines could be,

"Delta-vee is ready when you are."? ;-)

6 posted on 02/20/2002 4:32:29 PM PST by Jay W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Buzz should concentrate on the moon. The lunar surface is relativly close at a quarter million miles, and a lot of expoloration has yet to take place.

And best of all, a large optical telescope could be built on the lunar surface for studies of the earths surfaces and deep space research. If its a Hotel they want, it would be much easier to construct on the lunar surface than Mars.

The lunar surface could then be used as a stepping stone for Mars and beyond.

7 posted on 02/20/2002 4:35:31 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
expoloration=exploration
8 posted on 02/20/2002 4:36:30 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: boris
---So let's examine the "future" in a "Cycler vs. Non-Cycler" set of "scenarios."

1. "Non-Cycler,"--we get, maybe, one or two "Manned Missions to Mars;" we explore~ 10% of the Planet's surface--find little of value--& wait "half a Millennium" to re-visit THE most interesting place in our Solar system.

2. "Cycler," we set up a "regular, 'Trans-Martian Shuttle,'" we establish a viable "Base" on Mars, we become a TRULY "interplanetary Culture," & we--eventually--"Go to the Stars!"

As an optimist about the potential for our Species, I CANNOT SEE ANY serious objection to the "Cycler" choice.

We HAVE the "Means" to become a Spacefaring culture; it is SUICIDAL MADNESS to "turn our back" on our potential Future!

Like ANY Biologic Entity, we "Grow & Expand," or we "Involute & Die!"

I KNOW "Which Side I'm On!!"

Doc

9 posted on 02/20/2002 5:08:23 PM PST by Doc On The Bay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Bump!

Proud to be a Boliermaker!

10 posted on 02/20/2002 5:12:53 PM PST by Enemy Of The State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
Buzz should concentrate on the moon.

Absolutely, I could see the moon becoming a tourist destination in about thirty years. It would only be about a two week vacation. With Mars, this would be a two year vacation. I don't think too many people, no matter how wealthy they are, would sign on for that. Tourism will be the key motivator for the initial development of the moon. Private enterprise will be what draws us back to the moon, not a big government program. We tried that once and proved that government efforts aren't sustainable.

11 posted on 02/20/2002 5:17:55 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: boris
A cycler could be useful if we build a rather large one that can comfortably sustain a crew for several months. A small, high-power spacecraft can boost the crew to it. This spacecraft could be a tenth of the mass of the cycler.
12 posted on 02/20/2002 5:22:29 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brett66

13 posted on 02/20/2002 5:27:05 PM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Agree, a lunar project would be much more practical. Trips to the lunar surface could take 3 or 4 days, and tourist could use large lunar based optical telescopes to look back at their hometown regions of earth. They could have fun with large mirrors reflecting light back to their friends back on earth at prearrainged times. Radio stations could be set up and amateur radio operators (Hams) could easily communicate back and forth. And I agree, this could all be done probably within 30 years or less.
14 posted on 02/20/2002 5:34:11 PM PST by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

What a view!

15 posted on 02/20/2002 5:42:38 PM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
Arg, We could've sent humans to half the solar system by now if only we continued at the cold war pace of space exploration, all this cooperation and international consortium bullsh*t is slowing down human expansion into the final frontier, what we need is some old fashioned competition of resources and prestige.
16 posted on 02/20/2002 6:15:09 PM PST by borghead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson