Skip to comments.
Examiner columnist blasts "FreeRepugnant.com"
sf examiner ^
| Feb 15, 02
| Debby Morse
Posted on 02/15/2002 10:23:06 PM PST by churchillbuff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-350 next last
To: churchillbuff
There is no such thing as bad publicity. Yea!
2
posted on
02/15/2002 10:25:50 PM PST
by
Shermy
To: Breakem;Clintonh8r;MissAmericanPie;Hank Kerchief;Revelation 911
You're famous!
3
posted on
02/15/2002 10:27:48 PM PST
by
xm177e2
To: churchillbuff
Why give her ignorant @$$ the honor of gracing our blessed forum? She's obviously in need of attention. So she targets our site so hopefully SOMEONE will read the excrement she smeared onto paper.
To: churchillbuff
"I don't know why, but that "Hoo-yah!" unsettled me." I wonder if it's because she hates the military that defends her?
To: churchillbuff
THESE PEOPLE SEEM to hate women. Where did that come from? Isn't that typical of these people? You oppose abortion, and that means you "hate women." Or you simply disagree or have an opinion that differs from that taught at the Womens Studies department at your local college, and it means you "hate women." Kinda like if you oppose racial quotas and affirmative action, it means you "hate blacks."
They really do a disservice to their argument by such hyperbolic, hysterical mischaracterizations of those who disagree with them. (Some FR poster earlier tonight told me, simply, "You're insane...you're stupid" because he disagreed with something he THOUGHT I'd said (basically I'd posted something from MEDIA that he disagreed with.)
Point is: when these people lack the ability to cogently advocate their positions, and when their positions are indefensible, they INEVITABLY resort to, "well, if you disagree with me, it means you hate women."
6
posted on
02/15/2002 10:30:24 PM PST
by
gg188
To: churchillbuff
Ha Ha.
As if the saintly Debbie Morse would not hurl a few barbs this way. But really, who cares what she has to say anyway? What else could one expect from a rag like the Examiner? Any excuse to bash people on the side of the political spectrum opposite her will be taken with relish. It is just a dumb game. Nobody cares. Nothing changes. All is a blur of gray. Or is it grey? I always forget which is the color. But then, maybe they both are.
7
posted on
02/15/2002 10:31:00 PM PST
by
spoosman
To: churchillbuff
fofl .. oh this should be fun .. think she'll write about FR again???
8
posted on
02/15/2002 10:33:31 PM PST
by
Mo1
To: churchillbuff
She mentioned me twice, seems like I really fried her bacon, she didn't bother to refute any of it I notice.
To: gg188
Actually I said I didn't want porn outlawed on this forum and nopardons told me I hate women.
10
posted on
02/15/2002 10:34:21 PM PST
by
weikel
To: Breakem; clintonh8r; revelation911; MissAmericanPie
Pro-life ping!
11
posted on
02/15/2002 10:34:27 PM PST
by
Jen
To: churchillbuff
Well since she is more than likely lurking here again.
(to the author)I don't wish anything evil or harmful on you. I just hope a change takes place in your heart and you realize that life doesn't begin when you decide it does. No matter what the supreme court may have said in Roe. It begins at conception.
To: All
thank god for all the times i kept my mouth shut..the last thing i need is deathscythe's name in a paper....
To: xm177e2
Darn!! I've never been assaulted by a columnist!! (although there was that letter to editor back and forth with a Palestinian in '97....)
14
posted on
02/15/2002 10:35:13 PM PST
by
GeronL
To: churchillbuff
Damn. I'm never gonna get famous if I don't learn how to sharpen my knives against liberals a little more often around here.
To: gg188
Loving babies and wanting to protect them is anti-woman. Didn't you know?
To: gg188
Where did that come from? Isn't that typical of these people? You oppose abortion, and that means you "hate women." Isn't that what she's accusing us of??
17
posted on
02/15/2002 10:36:23 PM PST
by
GeronL
To: churchillbuff
I'd take "FreeRepugnant.com" over THE SOCIALIST MORONS AT SF EXAMINER any fricking day!!!!
To: churchillbuff
Not one of the better hit pieces. She's a little late to the game. Boooooring.
To: gg188
She balanced the article by having both sides of the issue represented.
Their was her trashing of the nutty women hating element of FR. and then she showed the good side of FR, that tried to keep the nutty side from going over the edge in their criticism of her.
See how good balanced jounalism can be?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-350 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson