Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child-Free and Carefree
ABC News ^ | February 14, 2002 | Geraldine Sealey

Posted on 02/14/2002 7:09:10 AM PST by Artie_Kay

When Ellen Metter was a young girl, she didn't go for the baby-doll thing. She dressed her Barbie up as Mary Tyler Moore — a single, urban professional with her own imaginary apartment and fun date nights."She was hip," says Metter, author of the recent humor book Cheerfully Childless. Now Metter, 42, wonders if her young lack of interest in nurturing dolls foreshadowed her adult lack of desire to have children.

Like many women who decide against children, Metter says she questioned her leanings on occasion — either through her own self-exploration or others' prodding questions. When she met her boyfriend a few years ago, she thought she wanted to have kids with him because it seemed like the ultimate expression of their love. But the couple eventually decided against it.

"My boyfriend has great genes, he's handsome, we'd make an adorable child," Metter says. "But then again, Hitler had parents."

Humor has helped Metter communicate with others about a topic she says is misunderstood by a family-oriented culture. "It's not right for me," Metter says. "And if you're like me and never had this visceral attraction to kids then it's probably not right for you either."

Indeed, more people are deciding kids are not for them as the ranks of the childless continue to swell.

Although a government report released this week showed American women having more children than at any time in the last 30 years — in many cases, a good economy made it easier for women to have additional children — more women are also postponing childbearing or foregoing it all together.

Of women ages 40 to 44 years old, near the end of their childbearing years, 19 percent are childless, the U.S. Census Bureau reports — a number almost twice as high as 20 years earlier.

While those statistics include women who would like to have kids or are infertile, more women say they're childless by choice. Nearly 7 million women of childbearing age defined themselves as voluntarily childless in 1995, the latest year available, up from 2.4 in 1982, according to the National Center of Health Statistics.

Shunned and Misunderstood

It's no coincidence that voluntary childlessness is on the rise as women are becoming more educated and eligible for a wide variety of opportunities outside of family life, says Madelyn Cain, author of the book The Childless Revolution.

Childless couples tend to be a more educated and affluent group than their counterparts with kids. With no child-related expenses to shell out, childless couples have more disposable income to spend — 60 percent more on entertainment, 79 percent more on food and 101 percent more on dining out than parents, according to American Demographics magazine.

Despite their growing numbers, many childless individuals and couples complain that they are ignored as a legitimate interest group and consumer class and even shunned by society for their lifestyles.

"We are with childlessness where we were with homosexuality 20 years ago," Cain says. "We always talk about family-friendly America. It is always part and parcel of a politician's package. But the package they're selling doesn't match the general public."

Those who are childless say they get all sorts of unwelcome, and unfair, observations from strangers, family, friends, and co-workers alike. They're told they are: Self-centered, deviant, workaholic, immature, and child-haters.

In reality, Cain said, the reasons people are childless are varied and complex: Some have environmental, religious, medical or professional reasons. For others, it's a matter of happenstance — they didn't meet the right partner or the time just never seemed right.

Child-Free: More Selfless Than Parenting?

Some particularly rabid Web sites devoted to the "child-free," as many like to be called, refer to parents as "breeders" and condemn procreation in general, but they seem to be in a vocal minority. Most who are childless by choice say they respect parents and enjoy children. They just know parenting is not for them.

A lack of understanding about the choice to be childless can be annoying when it comes from acquaintances, and downright devastating when it comes from loved ones, Cain said.

"When your mother says, 'You're gonna regret it,' if that doesn't send a chill through you or wake you in the middle of the night …" says Cain, who interviewed 125 childless women for her book. "Those are terrible things to hold over someone's head."

Lisa Casablanca Simmons, 36, knows what it's like to be poked with questions about the choice she made as a teenager not to have children. Married for 14 years, Simmons said her husband's family first thought she was selfish.

But Simmons sees her decision as rooted in not just honest self-assessment — she thinks she would make a "terrible mom" because she's not very patient — but also selflessness.

"Isn't it selfish to bring an unwanted child into this world?" says Simmons, who lives in Los Angeles. "We're doing right by not bringing an unwanted child into the world."

Finding a Substitute for the PTA

For Kathleen Sartoris, 32, of Queens, N.Y., choosing not to have children also was part of an honest, and in her view necessary, prioritizing of her life.

"I am sure I will miss out if I never have kids, but I know I will miss out on other things if I do," said Sartoris. "It's a tradeoff."

Sartoris and her husband of 10 years travel for work and pleasure, are going back to school, and spend time volunteering. Unlike their friends who have children, Sartoris and her husband also have the freedom to pick up new hobbies and activities and not feel guilty or time-strapped, she said.

"If you have children, you have to consider your child," Sartoris said. "The idea that you can do it all and have it all is a real misconception."

The growing popularity of an international social network for childless individuals and couples, called No Kidding, is further evidence of the increased visibility of the "child-free." No Kidding now has 71 chapters and has a convention set for next month in Las Vegas.

What No Kidding provides is the kind of social networking that many parents find in activities centered on their children, members say.

"PTA, school sports, carpooling. For adults who have children, the children have a huge social network, and are usually a starting point for meeting other adults," says Mitch Greenberg, 41, who organizes events for a Maryland chapter of No Kidding.

The child-free social group fills a social void for nonparents, he said, and helps replace friends who may have lost touch because parenting consumes their time.

At some point, friends who once had many things in common find themselves alienated from one another — even if reluctantly — when they choose different paths when it comes to childbearing. "Those who we lose contact with are usually the people who have children," says Greenberg, who has been married for 15 years. "You no longer have things in common, and they're usually not available to do things," he said.

Along with social isolation, some childless people claim that our family-centered culture can be unfair to them. Some childless workers complain of having to pick up the slack for working parents, or say they are more likely to be expected to work longer hours or weekends.

What's Fair for the Child-Free?

Other complaints from nonparents include watered-down group health insurance packages to compensate for others' young dependents, or the myriad benefits such as unpaid leave, child tax credits or greater 401(k) contributions that are reserved for parents.

Of course, working parents also have complaints about how they're treated in the workplace, and Cain doesn't deny that government and corporate policies can punish both parents and nonparents for the choices they've made.

Parents and nonparents need to start communicating with one another about what is fair, Cain said. Working parents should be able to leave the job if their child is sick, Cain said, but so should childless workers have opportunities to take personal time away for themselves as well.

A compromise could be for companies to offer "personal hours" away from work instead of entire days, so workers could use their hours to fill their personal or family needs without leaving for an entire day, Cain suggests.

But Cain, who has a 16-year-old daughter, born when she was almost 40 years old, said her greatest hope is for people with and without children to understand and accept one another and their lifestyle choices.

"It could have been that I didn't have a child, would it have made me a lesser being? I hope not," Cain said. "Each woman's life should be valued as important for the choices she makes."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-308 next last
To: Bella_Bru
I bet he/she will turn out to be a hit-and-run poster.

I'd bet money that you're right. Looks like the old "divide and conquer" to me!

161 posted on 02/14/2002 9:22:05 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bump in the night
Excuse me???? I don't have kids. But I Do pay a sh*tload of my income to social security every year. And guess what... I plan on collecting MY money when I'm an old fart and can't work for it.

This sort of works as long as there are not too many people like you. Otherwise, we'd have an economy of old farts selling their stock certificates to each other and staffing each other's nursing homes.

162 posted on 02/14/2002 9:22:15 AM PST by Feldkurat_Katz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Good point. Her refusal to attend probably made the party better.
163 posted on 02/14/2002 9:23:18 AM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: oremus
How am I rebellious? For marrying a non roman catholic? For eating at The Witchery? For attending non roman catholic weddings?

It goes against the teachings of the catholic church to eat dinner at a restaurant named The Witchery? It goes against the teachings of the catholic church to attend weddings of non catholics and weddings in places other than a catholic church?

Why has this roman catholic never been taught of these evils? And what the hell was that roman catholic priest that married me to a jew thinking? Surely he is going to burn in hell.

164 posted on 02/14/2002 9:24:26 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: hunyb
Oh man, you are gonna get it now. Repent!
165 posted on 02/14/2002 9:25:01 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

Comment #166 Removed by Moderator

To: Feldkurat_Katz, redhead
"Methinks you are attacking redhead ad hominem.

If it looks like that, my sincere apologies to redhead.

Too often, conservatives use the economic argument for population growth. That directly implies the planned (vice free market) economy mindset of socialism. It also misses the point that, without population growth, a civilization will eventually be pushed out of existence. "Survival" makes discussion of issues like taxes and economic growth meaninless.

167 posted on 02/14/2002 9:27:36 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

Comment #168 Removed by Moderator

To: freeeee
Sounds like she did everyone a big favor.

She is actually a very nice lady and a lot of fun to be around. The only reason that it really sticks in my mind and that I have found it a problem is that 20 of us flew to Edinburgh Scotland for this wedding, which she was planning on attending prior to getting there and then she crapped out on us. It was very rude and disrespectful to the hosts in my opinion and thats why i have had a problem with it. Not to mention how she treated her best friend who brought her along to go to her sons wedding.

169 posted on 02/14/2002 9:27:56 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Crunchy Jello
Clark Howard.
170 posted on 02/14/2002 9:30:00 AM PST by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Crunchy Jello
Clark Howard is a consumer information type guy that has a very popular radio talk show out of WSB in Atlanta. Same station that Boortz is out of. He hates extended warranties and constantly tells people to not buy them as they are a major rip off. Which they are.
171 posted on 02/14/2002 9:30:16 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Since a couple's willingness to accept new life is a requirement for a sacramental marriage, these "marriages" really aren't.

Ummm... "requirement for a sacramental marriage"???? Exactly what religion are we talking about here? Yours? You see, the problem is, is that that is YOUR religious belief. Not everyone in the world has the exact same beliefs as you. Maybe these marriages really aren't from YOU point of view, but they sure as hell are from others!

172 posted on 02/14/2002 9:31:14 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Artie_Kay
"My boyfriend has great genes, he's handsome, we'd make an adorable child," Metter says. "But then again, Hitler had parents."

If this is indicative of her thought process then perhaps it's a blessing she didn't have children.

173 posted on 02/14/2002 9:33:20 AM PST by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
i don't like you. just because i choose not to have a child, my marriage is meaningless? or did you mean that in God's eyes, we aren't really 'married'? sod off.
174 posted on 02/14/2002 9:33:48 AM PST by hunyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: oremus
Are they damned? I can't damn them but let's just say they are in great danger of it, depending on many factors that only God can weigh.

I thought that if you're Catholic, all you had to do was go to confession, tell the priest your sins and do some hail Marys or something and you got to go to heaven. How can someone be damned if that's all they have to do?

175 posted on 02/14/2002 9:34:10 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Crunchy Jello
The daughters with the drinking and alcohol problems have yet to come into their own.
176 posted on 02/14/2002 9:34:16 AM PST by DonkeyHodee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Again, this is just simple ignorance of the Catholic faith. Let me explain.

The woman, who is obviously well-versed in the Church's teachings, unlike most Catholics today, did not refuse to attend the wedding simply because it was in a Protestant church. Catholics are NOT forbidden to attend weddings of those of other denominations.

What she did do, was refuse to attend the weddings of CATHOLICS who are marrying OUTSIDE the Church, which is not allowed. Had these CATHOLICS wed (a Protestant, Jew, whatever) in a CATHOLIC ceremony, she would have attended. Had she done so she would have been condoning the situation. Now I know you'll probably have an answer for that, too, but I don't have anymore time to spend here today on that can of worms, which is also explainable.

You married a Jew, as a Catholic, in the Catholic Church. No problem at all.

As for the "Witchery," I wouldn't care to go there either. I've had too many scary experiences with the "dark side" and don't need to be encouraging any more. As for the lady, she has a right to her personal choice to not attend such a place without reproach, just as people have the "right" to not have children within a marriage. Besides, you don't know what's in her heart.

177 posted on 02/14/2002 9:36:28 AM PST by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Bump in the night
Boy sopranos and Osmonds rose up through the air
While the Catholics and Protestants screamed, "It's not fair!"
Even the Orthodox flocks had been left;
It turned out that the Mormons had made the right guess.
178 posted on 02/14/2002 9:37:20 AM PST by geaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Pumping out a taxpayer never crossed my mind when we had our two.

rofl! Boy, you're not kidding! Sounds like something that Nazi Germany would have required.

179 posted on 02/14/2002 9:38:21 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: oremus
"If there are some who are genuinely needy, yes we should share."

I need a 5 megapixel digital camera and a new 2GHz PC with two 80Gb 7500RPM HDDS, 1Gb RAM, with full A/D video copying and editing capability. Dual CD-DVD/RW would be nice, but I don't want to be greedy about it.

Heck, anybody'll give ya food.

180 posted on 02/14/2002 9:38:43 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 301-308 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson