Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stop Shays-Meehan

Posted on 02/11/2002 8:23:37 AM PST by rwfromkansas

Freepers, it is very important that you act to stop campaign finance "reform." This is a bill that threatens our very political liberty and we need to take a stand to oppose it. It bans political ads, so groups like FR could not pool resources to spread the conservative view on the air, all the while the media get to say whatever they wish with NO CONSEQUENCES. The bill scarily works against all sorts of political common causes in addition to banning soft money. By banning soft money, free speech is stifled. However, unions are not restricted by this bill, which is patently unfair. Contact your congressmen TODAY AND DO IT OVER AND OVER. We need to send a message that we will not support an incumbent protection act.

Call toll free #'s: 1-800-648-3516 and 1-877-762-8762.

Make sure to get your congressional office and the offices of the leadership.

Encourage your congressmen to vote against it due to the unfair advantage it places on unions and the media, as well as the fact it destroys free speech. Encourage them to do all they can to stop others from supporting it as well.

We can not count on a veto from President Bush. He is under lots of pressure from the media and may allow pretty much any bill to pass, quietly working to get Republicans to challenge it in the courts. We need to call the White House as well.

Call 202-456-1414.

Make sure to say that Bush needs to stand firm on this because it will hurt the GOP, hurt America, and destroy our Constitutional principles. Also, state that you believe he is doing a good job and should not cave in to pressure. Furthermore, state you hope that if it passes Congress, he will use his bully pulpit to show the American people why he had to veto the bill. This could include such extreme measures as a presidential address to the nation if necessary. The President should take a firm stand and let Americans know what the bill really is about.

Lastly, we can hope that the courts will take this on and stop the enforcement of this law, but hoping is not an excuse to sit back and do nothing. If you want to see this stopped, make your voice heard. Contact our leaders in Washington...they need to know we are watching their moves.

Freepers, Let's Roll.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Free Republic
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: rwfromkansas
bump
41 posted on 02/11/2002 9:37:22 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
42 posted on 02/11/2002 9:37:57 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
43 posted on 02/11/2002 9:38:41 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Contacted all four New York congresscritters and, frankly, am shocked to see my rep. Sue Kelly on this list. Plan to change the wording someone and fax to the rest. BUMP.
44 posted on 02/11/2002 9:48:10 AM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dittomom
LOL!!! I'm on that mailing list, too!! Comes in handy, n'est ce pas ???
45 posted on 02/11/2002 9:50:30 AM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a liar
Does Keyes have plans to talk about this on his show? Is there going to be an e-mail alert sent to his e-mail list? I thought I would ask. God bless!
46 posted on 02/11/2002 9:53:30 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
I am going to call J.C. Watts and see if he is going to put out an e-mail to his list members also since I have not received anything yet and I am on his list.
47 posted on 02/11/2002 9:55:10 AM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
bump
48 posted on 02/11/2002 10:02:01 AM PST by Libertarian_4_eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Can you keep this thread at the top of Breaking News until the House votes on CFR? I believe that this is a very important free-speech issue and should have maximum attention.
49 posted on 02/11/2002 10:02:06 AM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Ping it! :-)
50 posted on 02/11/2002 10:06:36 AM PST by PeteF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
That tripe would only make sense to someone who is an enemy of freedom and viewed it as good propaganda to pull the wool over the eyes of the public. You aren't fooling anyone here with your baloney, and won't anytime soon.

What freedom are you talking about? Freedom of speech? It seems to me, IMHO, that the only folks who benefit from unregulated campaign cash are candidates and the RICH individuals and organizations who can afford to place issue ads....i.e. Wiley Brothers, NAACP. Free speech was meant by the Founding Fathers to be just that: "free". Just try to get your issue ad in the media if you have no money, LOL...you'll find the price higher than a night in the Lincoln bedroom during the Clinton Administration. Wealth is not speech! Wealth, pure and simple, is money!

51 posted on 02/11/2002 10:10:54 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Freedom of speech is not free.
52 posted on 02/11/2002 10:18:04 AM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Shays/Meehan exempts News Media, how is that for fairness?
53 posted on 02/11/2002 10:21:39 AM PST by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quicksilver
The bottom line is if soft money is really evil, ban all soft money and raise the hard money limit and mandate full disclosure. Simple.

I guess this means you support the government being able to limit the money at all. Government involvement in regulating campaigns must be a new Republican/conservative tenet.

54 posted on 02/11/2002 10:21:51 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
We can not count on a veto from President Bush. He is under lots of pressure from the media and may allow pretty much any bill to pass, quietly working to get Republicans to challenge it in the courts

What a sad commentary that the supposedly conservative President cannot be relied upon to veto a bill that repeals the first amendment. Too much media pressure. A President who either has no principles or values his political popularity more than he values them. "He may allow pretty much any bill to pass."

Pretty frightening stuff coming from his supporters.

55 posted on 02/11/2002 10:28:39 AM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
I would support no limits, so long as there is full disclosure within a few days of receipt.
56 posted on 02/11/2002 10:30:57 AM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: ThomasJefferson
I would not at all be surprised if President Bush vetoed a CFR bill that did not meet his stated criteria. He basically told congress don't look to me for political cover, IOW, don't vote for a CFR bill so you can say that you voted for it BS.
58 posted on 02/11/2002 10:41:43 AM PST by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: dittomom; rwfromkansas; Sir Gawain; Rodney King; dead; Rebelbase; Reagan Man; PeteF; Dog Gone...
Congresswoman Shelly Moore Capito [(R-WV) - (202) 225-2711 - (202) 225-7856 fax ] has her own amendment to the Shays-Meehan bill. She wants some type of political party matching funds for candidates who spend over $100,000 of their own money on their own campaign. Her opponent in 2000, Jim Humphreys (and possible opponent again this year), spent $6 MILLION of his own money on his loosing campaign. This forced Shelley Capito to seek campaign contributions from wherever she could get them to

Just like when we dig into it far enough we'll find creative avoidance of the IRS tax codes behind alot of the Enron mess, millionaire candidates pushing Congress towards a plutocracy are behind alot of the Campaign Finance mess. There was a 'millionaire candidate' amendment which got shot down from the last CFR proposal.

59 posted on 02/11/2002 10:46:01 AM PST by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Freepers take action

I'd like to but RINO Greenwood is my representative to Congress.

But, in a timely coincidence, last night as I was researching his record for the upcoming primary challenge I came across the NRLC scorecard. Scroll on down to vote 18 for more information.

60 posted on 02/11/2002 10:47:49 AM PST by ohmage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson