Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bushies Target Hillary in Expanded Scandal Probe
Newsmax ^ | 2/9/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 02/09/2002 6:59:22 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

In an astonishing reversal of President Bush's nonchalant attitude towards an array of corruption charges against Bill and Hillary Clinton, the president and his aides are now said to be "quietly pushing" a probe into allegations that Clinton staffers trashed the White House in Jan. 2001.

What's more, they've asked that the newly revved up investigation focus on the East Wing, where former first lady Hillary Clinton had her offices.

The shift could mean the GAO probe will also examine evidence that Mrs. Clinton absconded with furniture and other White House artifacts to decorate her private mansions in New York and Washington.

"White House folks suggested we cast as wide a net as possible," GAO director Bernard Ungar told the New York Daily News Saturday, adding that the Bushies wanted to redirect the probe's previous focus from the Eisenhower office building to Mrs. Clinton official digs.

The request for action on the Clinton vandalism charges prompted complaints from GAO chief David Walker, who told the News, "they want us to do more work than is even reasonable."

The Clinton probe could prove distracting to Walker's focus in recent weeks: prying loose White House records on meetings between Vice President Dick Cheney and Enron officials.

Immediately after reports of White House vandalism, Bush seemed to take no interest in the episode and urged the media to look that other way.

"There might have been a prank or two, maybe somebody put a cartoon on the wall, but that's OK." he told reporters. "It's time now to move forward."

But after Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner complained last June that Clinton workers had been unfairly smeared and demanded the Bushies apologize, White House press spokesman Ari Fleischer said the destruction was more extensive then the president had let on.

A list of damages he released included:

75 phones that had been "tampered with," including 10 where the lines had been cut.

Twenty percent of the desks in the Eisenhower Office complex had been overturned.

Obscene graffiti was discovered by Bush staffers in six offices.

A 20-inch-wide presidential seal had been ripped off a wall.

One hundred computer keyboards had been rendered inoperable by the Clinton vandals.

Pornography was left behind in White House photocopiers.

Trash was spilled throughout the White House counsel's office, along with other assorted random damage.

One estimate put the cost of the destruction as high as $250,000.

Bush administration spokeswoman Claire Buchan said the White House counsel's office had photographs of the vandalism, but did not explain why they were not offered to the GAO when the agency first requested proof in April.

In releasing the list of damages, Fleischer explained, "We tried to be gracious, but the last administration would not take graciousness." Claims that Bush staffers had lied about the destruction had forced him to respond, he said.

After Fleischer's comments, the GAO's Ungar began backtracking on his April report that there was no unusual damage to the White House after Clinton staffers departed.

"Ungar said the GAO found accounts of damage that included telephones disconnected from wall jacks, phones with extension numbers defaced and tables and desks that were overturned," reported Newsday, in a follow up story on Fleischer's list.

It's not clear whether the White House's newly aggressive attitude will translate into action in the office of the U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District, which has been accused of footdragging in its probe into the Clinton Pardongate scandal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enronlist; globalcrossing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 421-429 next last
To: KantianBurke
Nice try, but you have failed miserably. By now even you must be aware that the Bush administration merely inherited the Enron fiasco. Enron was neck deep in its corrupt business dealings during the Clinton years. Billy Boy Clinton personally helped Enron get a very lucrative contract in India. It's gratifying to see this administration finally investigate the trashing of the White House by the losers and scumbags of the previous administration.
321 posted on 02/09/2002 6:53:45 PM PST by Joan912
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gabby hayes
What about Al Gore's E-mail during the Buddist Temple fundraisers. A couple of weeks ago I heard they had finally found them, but not another word about it since!
322 posted on 02/09/2002 7:01:35 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This is of course newsmax BS of the highest order, thrown out to keep some of us on the right believing something will ever be done about the Clntonistas.

Nothing will be done. The Clintons and their accomplices have been issued full pardons.
323 posted on 02/09/2002 7:01:54 PM PST by wheezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quesera
Post #2 I thought the bitch had an office in the West Wing.

Post #114 Nope! Al Gore won on this one. Remember when she threw a lamp at Clinton?
I think it was because she didn't get her office in the West Wing. ;-)

Post#144 Did she really? Don't remember hearing about this.

Yep! she did.

Inaugural week, 1993: Barbra Streisand led the Celebrity Salute to the new president. Barney the purple
dinosaur was the star of the parade. The crowds were so dense that people tried to hoist their kids on
the Portosans to get a better view. Bill Clinton, contrary to his supporters' worst fears, did not talk too
long after he took the oath of office. The insiders exchanged rumors about who was getting what
job and everyone else talked about who was going to what party. The gossip du jour, however,
was the story of Hillary Clinton and the lamp. The First Lady, it was whispered, had
thrown a lamp at her husband during a fight in the White House Sometimes the argument was said to
have started because the president-elect ogled one of the celebrities at the pre-inaugural show.
Sometimes it was about whether or not Hillary Clinton's offices would be located in the critical White
House West Wing.

Hillary's Lamp. For Full Story click here

324 posted on 02/09/2002 7:04:33 PM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The article the link points to on Newsmax is a year old.Check the date on the linked story.02-09-01.
So whats up with that?.
325 posted on 02/09/2002 7:33:57 PM PST by reloader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
We know how this works, they spend years "investigating" and nothing comes of it. The report (no matter how damaging) is packed away.
326 posted on 02/09/2002 7:35:28 PM PST by Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"There is no ethical, moral, or legal excuse to allow the Clintons, and God knows how many others, to escape from the consequences of their lawless actions."

Exactly!! In America, when laws are knowingly broken, people go to jail.

FReegards...MUD

327 posted on 02/09/2002 7:51:27 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
In America when laws are knowingly broken, people go to jail.

You don't even have to know you broke a law to go to jail; i.e., if you knowingly own a switchblade in Colorado, you have already broken the law: you cannot own a switchblade in Colorado. Ignorance of that law does not prevent the consequences of breaking that law.

328 posted on 02/09/2002 8:05:58 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
I'm with you on this LouD, except for this description of Choate. He was Ross Perot's running mate in 1996, you may remember, and was a big Pat Buchanan backer in the GOP in 1992 and 1996, and in the Reform Party in 1999 to 2000 which makes him more a just plain whacko, I think.

His views are xenophobic, protectionist, and much closer to those of the protest groups of Seattle and Davos than to anyone in the Republican Party. PJB, although socially a conservative, is way out in left field when it comes to economics, with nut jobs like Choate and Lyndon LaRouche for company.

329 posted on 02/09/2002 8:12:39 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"Ignorance of that law does not prevent the consequences of breaking that law."

Clinton and the BastardRATS who service his every whim are fully aware of the Laws they broke...and they can't be sleeping too well these days.
As far as I'm concerned, Justice is a foregone conclusion...MUD

330 posted on 02/09/2002 9:14:12 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's not clear whether the White House's newly aggressive attitude will translate into action in the office of the U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District, which has been accused of footdragging in its probe into the Clinton Pardongate scandal.

Of course it is. It's clear as a bell. This is designed to give the Bush-Bots faith that their idol really is going to do something,and re-affirm their faith. What MIGHT happen here is a few low-level staffers MIGHT end up getting charged with something like "destruction of gooberment equipment",and end up with probation. No way in HELL does this lead directly to either Bubba-1 or Buh-Bette!

On the other hand,selling pardons leads DIRECTLY towards the both of them,and no way in hell is Bubba Bush going to try to cross THAT stream. He is terrified of them.

331 posted on 02/09/2002 9:52:50 PM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Whatever. At best this will be an "official investigation" into the most pissant of the Clinton crimes which will ultimately result in virtually nothing in terms of a conviction -- while much more serious crimes continue to be buried.

Same MO as with Starr finding nothing but Lewinsky.

332 posted on 02/09/2002 11:08:12 PM PST by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I'll believe it when I see it. Ain't nothing going to happen.
333 posted on 02/09/2002 11:23:05 PM PST by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republic
"The GAO is at war with Bush"

Isn't that sickening, considering how much they covered for the klintoons? I just pray, please God, let these dirty traitor bastards feel your wrath sooner rather than later!!!

334 posted on 02/09/2002 11:46:30 PM PST by tinacart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A warning to the people. Imagine how she would leave the White House next time?

The only way I can think of would be feet first.

335 posted on 02/10/2002 12:29:46 AM PST by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Conspiratoristo;dubyaismypresident;Pontiac;Commiewatcher;Dr.J'sFirst;His_Law_Is_Liberty...
BTTT.......
336 posted on 02/10/2002 4:28:51 AM PST by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"The request for action on the Clinton vandalism charges prompted complaints from GAO chief David Walker, who told the News, "they want us to do more work than is even reasonable.""

.......and just what is it going to take to get this slimebag Walker out of this office?????????

337 posted on 02/10/2002 4:37:58 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reloader
I think that date is an error. The text of the article clearly refers to recent events (Enron, Ken Lay, notes of meetings with Cheney) to make it obvious.
338 posted on 02/10/2002 5:22:20 AM PST by golfGodd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
David Walker used to work for Arthur Andersen. Why is he not recusing himself from this investigation? Interesting how selective they all are. Lieberman is on Fox right now and when asked if he should have recused himself because of money from Enron Lieberman said he received only $2000 but failed to mention his monies from Arthur Andersen as well as Citigroup. What a weasel.
339 posted on 02/10/2002 5:39:17 AM PST by olliemb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: olliemb
Lieberman . . . What a weasel.

Ain't he though? Can you imagine if he were V.P. right now? Puke!

340 posted on 02/10/2002 5:45:49 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson