Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly: Bush Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers
NewsMax ^ | February 3, 2002 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 02/03/2002 4:14:41 PM PST by MeekOneGOP

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-175 next last
To: ravingnutter
The GOP has free will to do what it wants, but I won't vote for it again because of this

You probably didn't vote for 'em last time either.

81 posted on 02/04/2002 5:40:41 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
Sorry Ravingnutter. That post was for palo verde. I clicked your post by mistake.
Apologies.
82 posted on 02/04/2002 5:44:52 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: palo verde
Pardons are Constitutional

"Pardons for Pesos" is not!

83 posted on 02/04/2002 6:07:42 AM PST by Attillathehon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Bush Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers

Yeah.
They're too busy spending thousands of taxpayer dollars
on curtains to cover up the exposed nipple on the statue of Justice!


84 posted on 02/04/2002 6:25:57 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

:

85 posted on 02/04/2002 6:28:09 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
No wonder so many people are getting irritated with you.
Please don't speak for me. Thanks.
Huh? Did I miss something here????
86 posted on 02/04/2002 6:31:32 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
People are tired of Washingtons Clinton scandals [etc]. . .

I think you're on to something there. Bush came to Washington to be a uniter not a divider, etc. . .

87 posted on 02/04/2002 6:35:39 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Lulu
Also your insinuation that "the guy" was "set up" as VP is erroneous...John W. Hinckley, Sr. was the president and chairman of the board of Vanderbilt Energy Corporation of Denver, where Scott Hinckley was VP of Operations. It was a family business. John Hinckley Jr. never had a job in the oil business, he was estranged from his family due to his mental illness and was financially cut off at the advice of the family appointed psychiatrists. Had to hunt that one down, couldn't remember it offhand...but I just knew what you were saying wasn't correct. Also for future info, the Bush family and the Hinckley family both lived in Houston, they were actually neighbors, so there is nothing sinister about Neil knowing Scott.
88 posted on 02/04/2002 6:43:21 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
They're too busy spending thousands of taxpayer dollars on curtains to cover up the exposed nipple on the statue of Justice!

LOL! Well, we wouldn't want Ashcroft to be embarrassed now, would we?? :o)

89 posted on 02/04/2002 6:54:11 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
When Dubya-ese is spoken in Hell?

John Beaver-Face Ashcroft should be ashamed of himself.

90 posted on 02/04/2002 7:10:28 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Bush has to "play the game."

Does he really HAVE to, when the game is more like a cover-up racket?

91 posted on 02/04/2002 7:12:28 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
LOL! Well, we wouldn't want Ashcroft to be embarrassed now, would we?? :o)

Screw him. We should tell the tabloids that he and some fat rodent (perhaps A BEAVER) were separated at birth.

92 posted on 02/04/2002 7:17:23 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Does anyone remember the FBI files that the Clinton's hold?

As long as pardongate remains in the courts, the Clintons will not be able to use them to force their agenda through congress.

93 posted on 02/04/2002 7:52:59 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Who was it?
94 posted on 02/04/2002 7:55:14 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Asa Hutchison by chance?
95 posted on 02/04/2002 7:56:30 AM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The problem with trying to pin any significant violation of law on the Clintons is that there would always be a hung jury, no matter what the evidence was. The Clintons would portray themselves as VICTIMS x 10, and all their toadies would be out on the Sunday natter shows proclaiming the same message and pillorying the EVIL REPUBLICANS (remember their disgraceful campaign about Ken Starr--and virtually NOBODY even spoke up in his defense?)

One thing I would guess about the Clintons is that they probably are smart enough not to have left much of a trail of really hard evidence. The dems. who sneer "prove it" about every evil and/or felonious action the Clintons take would make a Clinton hung jury a victory for the Clintons. This is sad, but I believe it is true, at least right now.

96 posted on 02/04/2002 7:57:59 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The Bush Admin. has been a strong protector of Bill and Hillary's butt's, it proves Bush believes the laws are only for the peons, not the political powerful. So much for Bush being a conservative, a conservative would never allow such Bias against the law.
97 posted on 02/04/2002 7:58:22 AM PST by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
Very good. I've read two reports from DEA agents working the case that claim obstruction. Never heard that at the confirmation hearings.
98 posted on 02/04/2002 8:01:56 AM PST by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Bill Clinton.... Forget him.

Good advise Luis.

99 posted on 02/04/2002 8:02:07 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Oops.

Make that advice, not advise.

100 posted on 02/04/2002 8:04:52 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson