[Irene Adler]

The problem with trying to pin any significant violation of law on the Clintons is that there would always be a hung jury, no matter what the evidence was. The Clintons would portray themselves as VICTIMS x 10, and all their toadies would be out on the Sunday natter shows proclaiming the same message and pillorying the EVIL REPUBLICANS (remember their disgraceful campaign about Ken Starr--and virtually NOBODY even spoke up in his defense?)

One thing I would guess about the Clintons is that they probably are smart enough not to have left much of a trail of really hard evidence. The dems. who sneer "prove it" about every evil and/or felonious action the Clintons take would make a Clinton hung jury a victory for the Clintons. This is sad, but I believe it is true, at least right now.

[MeekOneGOP]

One thing I would guess about the Clintons is that they probably are smart enough not to have left much of a trail of really hard evidence. The dems. who sneer "prove it" about every evil and/or felonious action the Clintons take would make a Clinton hung jury a victory for the Clintons. This is sad, but I believe it is true, at least right now.

The phrase that comes to mind is "there's not one SHRED of evidence". . .Well of course NOT, they even burned the shredded paper!