Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds
Telegraph UK | 3 Feb 2002 | Damien McElroy

Posted on 02/03/2002 11:52:50 AM PST by The Old Hoosier

A DECISION by President Bush to suspend £24 million of United States funding to a United Nations body accused of assisting forced abortions in China is threatening to cloud his visit to Beijing this month.

By withholding the money from the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), Mr Bush has made clear his opposition to China's extreme population control methods. Beijing is hoping to extend the controls, which restrict the majority of couples to one child, for another generation.

Beijing is furious with Mr Bush, who has been swayed by reports implicating the UNFPA in abuses of the one-child policy. China's foreign ministry told The Telegraph that the US had not made the "correct choice".

"The allegations by some American congressmen on the UNFPA's support for China's forced abortion and sterilisation operations is totally groundless," said a spokesman. "Some Americans, acting regardless of the facts, have lobbied for the US to cancel its donation to the UNFPA. This is with ulterior intentions, and is unfavourable for international co-operation in population control."

Allegations about UNFPA collusion with Chinese officials responsible for forcing women to terminate unauthorised pregnancies came late last year from the Population Research Institute (PRI), an American right-to-life research group.

Scott Weinberg, the PRI director of government affairs, conceded, however, that the administration would suffer a backlash from the powerful pro-China lobby if Mr Bush criticised the one-child policy while visiting the country.

"If Bush makes the UNFPA issue into a question of China's one-child policy and into an attempt to reform Communist China, then we lose, because the China lobby is too powerful here," he said. "Bush would never bring up UNFPA publicly, and highly unlikely privately, during such a trip." Conservative members of the US Congress note that the President did not mention the issue on a trip to Shanghai in October. His decision on January 12 to halt UNFPA funding has angered China, however, and is set to inject a sour note into this month's visit, starting on February 21.

The trip has been portrayed by Beijing as marking the 30th anniversary of Richard Nixon's groundbreaking visit to China in 1972.

The PRI has campaigned to persuade Congress that the UN agency is ineligible for US financing because it supports abortion services abroad. US law prohibits grants of federal funds to any organisation involved in providing abortions overseas, and Mr Bush, in one of his first official acts, made clear that he - unlike President Clinton - would respect the restriction.

A PRI researcher, Josephine Guy, recently visited China incognito and claims to have witnessed a forced abortion in a county designated as a model family planning regime by the UNFPA.

Ms Guy gained access to Sihui county's family planning bureau to photograph the local UNFPA desk. At a local hospital later, she interviewed a 19-year-old woman minutes before family planning officials took her behind a curtain to perform a termination. "Would she like to keep her baby?" Ms Guy asked the teenager's friends as she was led away. "Oh, yes," came the reply, "but the law forbids it."

Steve Mosher, the head of the PRI, said the photographs and testimony obtained by Ms Guy proved that the UN body was violating its pledges not to assist abortion programmes. "The UNFPA has repeatedly been caught promoting abortion and sterilisation under circumstances where informed consent is lacking, and even outright coercion is involved," he said.

A report issued by his group included pictures of houses that had been demolished by Chinese family planning officials in retaliation for the occupants' refusal to abide by the one-child policy.

Sarah Craven, of the UNFPA Washington office, said the agency had negotiated with the Chinese for two years to ensure that its county programmes were not tainted by the zealotry or malpractice common in the implementation of the one-child policy.

"Our main goal is to show the Chinese that they can meet demographic goals without resorting to human-rights violations or coercion," she said.

In the drive to stabilise China's population at 1.6 billion by 2050, there have been millions of victims. Besides ordering abortions and sterilisations, family planning officials often grow wealthy from fines levied on people with no chance of legal redress.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: The Old Hoosier
F the Chicoms.
41 posted on 02/03/2002 4:08:42 PM PST by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
US law prohibits grants of federal funds to any organisation involved in providing abortions overseas, and Mr Bush, in one of his first official acts, made clear that he - unlike President Clinton - would respect the restriction.

A promise made, a promise kept.

42 posted on 02/03/2002 4:36:37 PM PST by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Beijing is furious with Mr Bush,

Since when can China can be furious with us giving them MONEY? Too many foreigners expecting that we're supposed to work for them.

I shouldn't be surprised though, we have that same mind-set here in America.

43 posted on 02/03/2002 5:01:43 PM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnChained
Amurka is ratcheting down the loose screws... one click of the wrench at a time.

click... click... click... click...

"are we there yet?"

click... click... click... click...

44 posted on 02/03/2002 6:30:13 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Robert ... every click is YOUR life winding down.

See ya.

45 posted on 02/03/2002 9:06:47 PM PST by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
I don't think I get you af.
46 posted on 02/03/2002 9:19:15 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
My comment was meant to mean bush is doing what it takes little by little... what was that from you?

A threat or something?

47 posted on 02/03/2002 9:21:03 PM PST by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Prince Caspian
"China's foreign ministry told The Telegraph that the US had not made the 'correct choice'".

"A most interesting choice of words."

Arrogant little bastards, aren't they.

48 posted on 02/03/2002 10:40:00 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
See also:

China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds
ForeignAffairs News
Source: The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.)
Published: 02/03/2002 Author: Damien McElroy
60 comments.

A DECISION by President Bush to suspend £24 million of United States funding to a United Nations body accused of assisting forced abortions in China is threatening to cloud his visit to Beijing this month. By withholding the money from the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), Mr Bush has made clear his opposition to China's extreme population control methods. Beijing is hoping to extend the controls, which restrict the majority of couples to one child, for another generation. Beijing is furious with Mr Bush, who has been swayed by reports implicating the UNFPA in abuses of the one-child policy. ...

11613492 posted on 2/2/02 5:21 PM pacific by Pokey78


49 posted on 02/04/2002 12:42:02 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Forcing an abortion on a woman is an abomination and I don't want one cent of my tax money to pay for it.

Nor do I!!! Well said!!!

50 posted on 02/04/2002 5:29:48 AM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier, borghead
Gee, I thought the Chinese were such proud people. I did not know that they were begging for US handouts to do their dirty deeds. What happenned to the 5000 year history and the vision to rule the world? This must really put a dent in their self esteem - I wonder how borghead is coping.
51 posted on 02/05/2002 5:34:04 AM PST by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
I don't think Bush has actually made the final decision on this. He probably will after his visit to China (if he makes it now he'll really piss them off). And it's not likely that he'll wait so he can get advice from Jiang Zemin. I think we've won this battle, but it's important for FReepers to keep calling the White House and leaving the comment, "Mr. President, please give zero to UNFPA!"
52 posted on 02/07/2002 1:20:22 PM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson