Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslim Woman Sues over Drivers License [FL: Show your face on driver license photo; FL Woman: No]
The Orlando Sentinel ^ | Jan. 30, 2002 | P. Gutierrez and A. Rippel

Posted on 01/29/2002 11:01:29 PM PST by summer

Muslim woman sues state over drivers license



By Pedro Ruz Gutierrez and Amy Rippel |
Sentinel Staff Writers
Posted January 30, 2002

WINTER PARK -- A 34-year-old woman is suing the state for suspending her Florida drivers license after she refused to have her photo taken without an Islamic veil.

Sultaana Freeman, a former evangelist preacher who converted to Islam about five years ago and wears the traditional niqab, says her religion doesn't allow her to show her face to strangers.

She filed suit earlier this month asking an Orange County judge to review her case.

"I don't show my face to strangers or unrelated males," Freeman said in an interview Tuesday at the office of her American Civil Liberties Union attorney. Only her emerald-green eyes and mascara showed through her veil.

The niqab is different from a hijab, or partial head covering, which doesn't hide the face and which some Muslim women wear for their drivers license photos.

Freeman, who is on an apparent collision course with the state, is bracing for a possible showdown on the fundamental freedoms of the U.S. Constitution.

"Florida law requires a full facial view of a person on their drivers license photo," said Robert Sanchez, a spokesman for the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. "We have no choice but to enforce it."

Florida law says license applicants shall be issued "a color photographic or digital imaged drivers license bearing a full-face photograph."

ACLU lawyer Howard Marks argues that the law is vague. "I don't think the state statutes mandate a photograph," he said.

Marks said he also will cling to a state law on religious freedom that states the "government shall not substantially burden a person's exercise of religion. "

Barry University Professor Robert Whorf said the state is probably within its right to ask for a full-facial photograph. "It makes common sense if the state of Florida were discriminating against her because of her religion; that would more likely be unconstitutional," he said. "If the state of Florida's rationale for insisting the veil not cover the face is for law-enforcement purposes that apply to everyone, then clearly the state of Florida is not discriminating against anyone for religious reasons."


To husband Abdul-Malik, also known as Mark Freeman, the state's action is an infringement on his and his wife's rights.

"It's a reflection of Sept. 11," said Abdul-Malik, 40, a 1980 Edgewater High School graduate and 1984 Florida State University graduate.

The Freemans said they only want recognition that their interpretation of Islam requires women to cover their faces.

Sultaana Freeman said she never had trouble in Illinois, where she worked as a civil engineer with the state's utilities company. That state, without objection, issued her license with a photo that showed only her eyes.

Her Florida license was issued with her face covered last February, but the state demanded a new photo without her veil in November. State record checks began after Sept. 11.

Altaf Ali, executive director of the Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said he knows of three other times Muslim women were refused Florida drivers licenses because of their headdresses. "I'm sure there's a lot more that's happening and not getting reported," he said.

Ali is asking the state to clarify its policy on religiously mandated clothes, and he wants the state to train employees about Muslim needs.

Yasmin Khan, 39, of West Palm Beachsaid she tangled with motor-vehicle officials when she was refused a drivers license in mid-December. Khan, a native of Trinidad and a Muslim, said she pulled her headdress back to her hairline -- as far as her religious beliefs would allow -- for the Dec. 17 photo but was told she needed to remove it completely. When she refused, she was denied a drivers license, she said.

"I decided to call anybody and everybody because I needed my license. I have kids, and I need to leave my home," she said.

Two days later, after getting help from local politicians, Khan was photographed with her hijab pulled back for her new drivers license.

In Daytona Beach earlier this month, Najat Tamim-Muhammad, 41, was refused a Florida identification card because she declined to remove her hijab.

Two years ago, Tamim-Muhammad, a native of Morocco, removed her headdress for the ID photo, but her husband said she did it only because she spoke no English and was unsure of her legal rights.

Idris Muhammad, her husband, said they plan to go back to the office to explain to a supervisor why she cannot remove the hijab. They hope to have the photo taken at that time.

"We understand the fear that comes with dealing with people you don't know or understand," he said. "In my opinion, it violates our equal rights under the law. Most people, when you sit down and explain why the women wear the hijab and the seriousness of not having it on, understand."

Amy C. Rippel can be reached at arippel@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5736. Pedro Ruz Gutierrez can be reached at pruz@orlandosentinel.com or 407-420-5620.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 561-568 next last
Comment #221 Removed by Moderator

To: Unbeliever
Uh, don't most muslim nations FORBID women to operate motor vehicles?

Same thought here, Unbeliever.

222 posted on 01/30/2002 6:00:20 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: mmmmmmmm....... donuts
How about giving the option of a thumbprint? That a form of ID where she can wear her burqa.

I thought about that, but my point remains -- are you also giving ME the option of a thumbprint? And, will a thumbprint from her be acceptable instead of a mug shot if arrested? And, do I get to bypass the mug shots too?

Unless you are going to do this for EVERYEONE please do NOT do it JUST for her and those like her. Many people in this country would LOVE a little more privacy, and if you are allowing her to give thumbprints instead of full face photos, then, I WANT THAT RIGHT TOO.
223 posted on 01/30/2002 6:02:04 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

Comment #224 Removed by Moderator

To: Xenalyte
Re your post #220 -- I think we should mark our calendars for that.
225 posted on 01/30/2002 6:02:54 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
Perhapes this creature does not belong in civilized society. She could move to Arabia, and get a camel driving license which does not require a picture,
226 posted on 01/30/2002 6:04:09 AM PST by imperator2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Can I be your first convert?
227 posted on 01/30/2002 6:06:33 AM PST by Attillathehon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WindRiverShoshoni
LOL! ROFL! Now there's a real lawyer liberal! The plain words don't mean what they say!
228 posted on 01/30/2002 6:06:49 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: summer
Can't blame them though since most Muslim women look like a cross between a camel and the back of a police dog.
229 posted on 01/30/2002 6:08:19 AM PST by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte;GeronL;summer
I'm in too! When do we celebrate the Feast of Maximum Occupancy?

I believe you are referring to one of the movable feasts. That is right after Frank Costanza's Festivus this year.

230 posted on 01/30/2002 6:09:04 AM PST by bwteim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: EverOnward
My ambivalence towards muslims has turned to total disgust.

Same here.
231 posted on 01/30/2002 6:09:21 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: summer
In my home state, driving is considered a privilege, not a right.

I imagine most others are like that. Your license can be revoked or not granted if you refuse to meet the requirements.

232 posted on 01/30/2002 6:09:43 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
I'm *very* tired of hearing their 'poor me' routine. waa waa waa...if you don't love America then leave. Sheesh!
233 posted on 01/30/2002 6:10:24 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: summer
bump
234 posted on 01/30/2002 6:10:53 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
SubGenius is the way to go. Most of the morality laws impinge on the religion. And it's already fairly well established (almost 30 years old now).

What are the laws like in FL? In AZ driving is classified a priviledge not a right, so if they run into something like this they can just tell the person to go away. If FL is setup that way that's the best defense "you don't have to drive, bye bye".

235 posted on 01/30/2002 6:12:58 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: baltoga
Hmm, I say no driver license, but give her a license to ride a camel..

Best idea yet -- fair and sensitive to her Islamic religion, and she can't complaint she has no means of private transportation. Now, if Mayor Hood in Orlando would just start building camel paths instead of bike paths, we'd have this all wrapped up.
236 posted on 01/30/2002 6:14:54 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: summer
Driving is a privilege. She can go back to her country and get a license to drive a camel. I digress, she has no rights in her country, that is why she is here taking advantage of our system.
237 posted on 01/30/2002 6:16:12 AM PST by all4one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Message to Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Iran: "ALL YOUR OIL WELLS ARE BELONG TO US"
238 posted on 01/30/2002 6:16:23 AM PST by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UberVernunft
Forget leather, go with latex -- looks better and feels better. Or so I've heard.

Gotta say no . . . leather is IT! It molds to you after a few wearings so well that no one else can wear your piece (I offer my corset as Exhibit A). Plus, it doesn't stick to you like latex does, and that's a definite consideration down here in 100-degree, 90%-humidity Houston.
239 posted on 01/30/2002 6:16:45 AM PST by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: bwteim
Yes, bwteim, I nominate you to keep track of all holiday matters as we establish this new religion. Also, I could use some approriate Festivus recipes for main dishes and desserts, if we are going to celebrate this year together, buffet-style. Let me know.
240 posted on 01/30/2002 6:17:14 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 561-568 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson