Posted on 01/23/2002 5:05:23 AM PST by Radioheart
|
Naked Greens
By Lowell Ponte |
| Now that new scientific evidence is turning against them, many Greens to advance their own selfishness, ideology and hypocrisy are now turning against science. continue… |
Deus Vult! 'Pod
The enviralists as part of the left wing must have control of the mediots to succeed.
Recently, we have reversed the left wing's attempt to PC the proposed Firemen's statute of the 3 firemen raising the flag after 9/11 at the WTC. This was the same revisionist tactic/strategy used 24/7 by the enviral Nazis. Just lie and reverse reality with phoney data!
These leftists have studied their role models the first Nazis. They know that to get their way, they must revise history and data with a supporting media. Then they can use spotted owls or short nose sucker fish to rurally cleanse America to protect something that doesn't need to be protected.
Their lies and perverted non data must be supported by a compliant media to create an Endangered Species. Once that fake Endangered Species is created, then they can rurally cleanse farmers, ranchers, loggers or who ever lives in the proposed new Druid Cathedral. Then they use our tax $'s to facilitate the rural cleansing!
It will take decades to reverse their damages and potential to cause damage as they attempt to rurally cleanse Americans from their new Druid Cathedrals!
Want to read something that is frightening? Creating a Dumbed-Down Populace - to Accept Global Governance
It's a long piece, but it explains clearly what we have been watching for 50 years, the HOW, the Who and the WHY behind it!
That's a bad bet. I'm 28.
I got an excellent graduate education, but in high school and college I learned in spite of my education.
I did plan to major in Biology, due to the enjoyment I had in high school (girls' school, no less). HOWEVER, the labs bored me out of my mind, so I broke off the idea of majoring in anything with labs!! I do like to read about physics.
the "bell curve" for women has a smaller variance than the one for men when it comes to mathematics.
Interesting insight. [My girlfriends and I who were "good" in math after all didn't win any Nobel prizes for theoretical mathematics! ;) ]
I won't dispute this as a premise. However, girls are capable of mastering at least standard arithmetic (the disparaged long division, multiplication tables, etc.) geometry, and algebra, and should be required to do so. There is no reason to invent a dummied-down fuzzy intuitive math to enhance their self-esteem or supposed access to power. Similarly, boys should take Engligh, foreign language, and read the classics . . . Everyone needs the basics. Math is also important in the development of logical thinking. If women (and men!) want to vote, they need to learn how to think logically, IMHO.
The feminists tho don't seem to realize that it is not a problem that people have different strengths; let's cooperate using everyone's strengths, not level-down to everyone's weaknesses.
Personally, I think everyone also should take logic, calculus, and probability/statistics. ;)
I think you are referring to Bush country from the last election map . . .
Hell yes! Heck--boys AND girls can master FAR more than they are required to today. I once saw on-line a seventh grade test dating from the early 1900's that today's high school graduates would have failed.
My wife is actually better at math than I am (we're both PhD chemists), but I managed to learn enough higher math to "make the grade". It just took a little more "skull sweat" to do so.
My point with the "cave man/woman" analogy is that the center for the Gaussian distribution is just a few points higher for males (for math) and a few points higher for females (for language), but obviously, MOST folks of both sexes CAN learn sufficient of both to do well.
The problem isn't the learning ability of humans--it is lousy teaching theories and methods.
Actually, it's the Field's Medal (unless you are involved in physics or economics somehow). Nobel is for wimps! :)
Same distribution in my family. ;) However, he did suffer from poor preparation in high school. Proving your basic point that education is letting our kids down -- both boys and girls.
Weelll, I "could" plead the same excuse. I went to a little old rural school in south Louisiana, while my wife went to private Catholic schools in the "big city". Kind of a double advantage on her part--the Catholic brothers and sisters weren't disadvantaged by "popular education theories"--they used what worked--enforcement of discipline and practice drill, drill, drill.
Yep, it was excellent. I have the video. Took a few weeks to get here, but it's absolutely excellent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.