Posted on 01/22/2002 5:43:47 AM PST by blam
Inventor says he's found free energy
January 22 2002 at 07:07AM
By Kevin Smith
Dublin - It has been a pipe-dream of inventors since Leonardo da Vinci, but has the secret of free energy now been found in Ireland?
A cold stone outhouse on a windswept Irish hillside may seem an unlikely setting for the birthplace of such an epoch-making discovery, but it is here that an Irish inventor says he has developed a machine that will do no less than change the world.
The 58-year-old electrical engineer, who lives in the Irish republic and intends - for "security and publicity-avoidance reasons" - to keep his identity a secret, has spent 23 years perfecting the Jasker Power System.
It can be built to scale using off-the-shelf components It is an electro-mechanical device he says is capable of nothing less than replenishing its own energy source.
The Irishman is not alone in making such assertions. The Internet is awash with speculation about free or "zero point" energy, with many claiming to have cracked the problem using magnets, coils, and even crystals.
"These claims come along every 10 years or so and nothing ever comes of them. They're all cases of 'voodoo science'," said Robert Park, professor of physics at the University of Maryland in the United States. The makers of the Jasker - a name derived from family abbreviations - say it can be built to scale using off-the-shelf components and can power anything that requires a motor
. "The Jasker produces emission-free energy at no cost apart from the installation. It is quite possibly the most significant invention since the wheel," said Tom Hedrick, the only person involved with the machine willing to give his name.
There is mounting urgency in the quest for alternatives Hedrick, chief executive of a company set up with a view to licensing the device in the United States, said the technology shattered preconceived laws of science.
"It's a giant leap forward. The uses of this are almost beyond imagination."
Not surprisingly, this topic is red hot with controversy - sharply dividing a world scientific community still on its guard after the "Cold Fusion" fiasco of 1989 when a group of Utah researchers scandalised the scientific world with claims - quickly found to be unsupported - that the long-sought answer to the problem of Cold Fusion had been discovered.
Experts contacted by Reuters were wary, citing the first law of thermodynamics which, in layman's terms, states that you can't get more energy out than you put in.
"I don't believe this. It goes against fundamentals which have not yet been disproved," said William Beattie, senior lecturer in electrical engineering at Queen's University in Belfast, Northern Ireland.
"These people (Jasker) are either Nobel prize-winners or they don't know what they're dealing with. The energy has to come from somewhere."
Undaunted, the inventor says that once powered-up, his device can run indefinitely - or at least until the parts wear out, adding that he has supplied all his own domestic power needs free for 17 months.
But he is keen to head off the notion that he has tapped into the age-old myth of perpetual motion.
"Perpetual motion is impossible. This is a self-sustaining unit which at the same time provides surplus electrical energy."
In a demonstration for Reuters, a prototype - roughly the size of a dish-washer - was run for about 10 minutes using four 12-volt car batteries as an initial power source.
Emitting a steady motorised hum, the machine powered three 100-watt light bulbs for the duration.
A multimeter reading of the batteries' voltage before the device started up showed a total of 48.9 volts. When it was switched off, a second reading showed 51.2 volts, indicating that, somehow, they had been reimbursed.
The machine went on to run for around two hours while photographs were taken, with no diminution in the brightness of the light bulbs, which remained lit during a short power cut.
"The draw on the batteries was estimated at more than 4.5 kilowatts. With any existing technology the batteries would have been drained flat in one and a half minutes," sai the inventor.
Modern theories of zero point energy have their roots in quantum physics and encompass the fraught areas of "anti-gravity machines" and "advanced propulsion" research.
Contributors to the debate range from serious exponents of quantum science to those who insist free energy secrets have been imparted to them by aliens.
Still others seem convinced that the US government is conspiring to suppress such discoveries.
Nick Cook, aerospace consultant to Janes Defence Weekly and author of The Hunt For Zero Point is not as quick as some to dismiss the possibilities.
"Zero point energy has been proven to exist, the question is whether it can be tapped to provide usable energy. And to that end, I think it's possible, yes. There are a lot of eminent scientists now involved in this field and they wouldn't be if there wasn't anything to it," he said.
"In my experience opinion in this field is extremely polarised... people either go with this area of investigation in their minds or they don't, and if they don't they tend to pooh-pooh it vehemently. It's very difficult to get an objective assessment," he said.
"Basically, no one wants to be the first to stick his head above the parapet."
Impervious to scepticism, Jasker's makers see the first practical application of their technology as a stand-alone generator for home use, although the automotive industry could also be a near-term target given the huge investment in developing substitutes for petrol-fuelled engines.
With world oil reserves running down, there is mounting urgency in the quest for alternatives.
If the Jasker men really are onto something, it could be the most important Irish invention since Guinness.
- Reuters
About the term "outhouse," in real English (as opposed to American "English") the word means any building away from the main house, not just the little place with a half-moon in the door. In this story it clearly means a workshop of some sort.
Yes, but for some eminently profitable. Numerous dried out husks of "free" internet companies and now Enron come to mind. Lot's of Rolexes(sp?) and Mercedes were purchased until the bubble burst.
Like an earlier poster said, I don't know if there is anything to this or not, but let's face facts, each new invention had it's birth in the mind of someone, somebody else called a crackpot.
Examples? Well, Bell and his Telephone, Ford and his "Horseless Carriages", and let's not forget Ron Popeel and his Pocket Fisherman.
This Guy MAY have done what no one else has successfully done before. Does this by default make him crazy, or render what work he has claimed to have achieved invalid simply because it hasn't been accomplished before?
Look at Tucker, and his Tucker Automobile. By today's standards it's a relic, but keep in mind, the Tucker, at it's time, was light years ahead of the competition. Things we take for granted in cars, such as seatbelts, were in the Tucker, and not in ANY of the other cars on the road at the time.
The bottom line is that the spark of invention has to begin somewhere. Who are we to say it CAN'T be done, simply because it hasn't so far?
How sad a place would this world be if no one ever attempted to do anything that no one else had done before. Think of it. 200 years ago, things we take for granted today would be the stuff of skeptics and naysayers ridicule. Where would we be if people like the Wright Brothers, Edison, Bell, and countless others had listened to the jeers of "Crackpot" and "Lunatic", or heeded that ever repeated phrase "It's Impossible"
OK, I'll get off my soapbox now...
Ummmm... I've got a spare room here you can stay in when you go broke! :)
From guys unwilling even to share their names.
I've seen too many of these things come down the pike even to waste breath refuting them.
Ayn Rand put that in her book. Possibly modeling the character on Nikola Tesla. She was possibly a philosopher, but probably not a scientist.
Oh, come on, Eileen...
Ginger ("IT", "Segway") may have disappointed a lot of people, but at least it's a real product that's kind of cool from a kid's point of view.
I't's incredibly easy to set up a public demonstration of free energy. Happens all the time. A lot harder to get the device to work when an outsider tries to duplicate it.
One last thought. During the atomic spy trials, a lot of folks thought that the greatest secret of the atomic bomb was the fact that it COULD be built. Prior to its demonstration, a lot of folks thought there were too many practical difficulties. If anyone ever demonstrates that free energy is actually possible, there are tens of thousands of engineers capable of duplicating it.
Violations of these 2 is a mandatory 5 years but he's likely to only get time served and probation.... So what good are the darn laws if they aren't going to be enforced......
Only when someone else is buying ;-P
What happens if it has military or national security applications (or implications), and is deemed something that would be dangerous to same if it was allowed to fall into the hands of the country's adversaries?
(I know the answer, but frankly, I'm not inclined to subject myself to the pile-on I'd get if I provided it, but I figure your creds should shield you from -- nay, staunch -- the onslaught.)
The Office of Patents and Trademarks [if he files in the US] will classify the device as perpetual motion anyway and reject the claims out of hand. He might get a design patent for a magnet configuration, but nothing more.
But look at the key word in your statement. Duplicate.
I'm not saying I'm betting the farm on this guys invention, but rather I'm very hopeful that he HAS done it. Think of the possibilities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.