Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAIL
Judicial Watch e-mail ^ | January 17, 2002 | JW

Posted on 01/17/2002 10:38:33 AM PST by litany_of_lies

GOVERNMENT ADMITS 1.8 MILLION E-MAIL FOUND AS A RESULT OF JUDICIAL WATCH‚S EXPOSING HIDDEN CLINTON-GORE E-MAIL ˆ RESTORED AT A COST OF OVER $12 MILLION

E-MAILGATE UPDATE

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that the government, in a court filing January 9, 2002, has admitted that it found 1,844,242 e-mail from the Clinton-Gore White House. This e-mail has never been searched in response to subpoenas and documents requests from Judicial Watch, Congress, and independent counsels. The e-mail were restored at a cost to taxpayers thus far of $12,066,346. The e-mail, which is in the custody of the National Archives, must now be searched pursuant to court orders.

Judicial Watch, which is prosecuting the Filegate $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were misused by the Clinton White House, first exposed the e-mail scandal in early 2000 through its client Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas. Another Judicial Watch client, former White House computer contractor Betty Lambuth, also testified (along with others) that high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing. These threats occurred in the middle of the Lewinsky scandal. The scandal was the subject of a months long evidentiary hearing that included the testimony of the late Charles Ruff, John Podesta, and Cheryl Mills. The court is in now considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings. A decision is expected soon.

„If not for Judicial Watch‚s heroic clients, this e-mail would have been lost forever. We are confident that the e-mail contains a treasure trove of information concerning Filegate, Chinagate, and, yes, even Enrongate. Any incriminating e-mail will be part of renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail,‰ stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chinastuff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last
To: deport
"Undoubtably the total of these emails won't be turned over to JW to let them do with as they see fit will they? Won't they have to be reviewed by someone in DOJ or whatever department to determine their relevance to the requested materials.

The Justice Dept. will turn over to JW the total amount of documents responsive to its FOIA request. These shrink-wrapped boxes will stay in JW's office until such time as JW decides that it is worth its time to actually open them and see what is inside. That time will often never come. JW really doesn't care what the documents are because it is not actually interested in discovery of information. JW has TONS of unopened boxes in its office.

Even if it opened the boxes, Judicial Watch does not have the manpower or expertise to make sense of what the e-mails or other documents represent.
81 posted on 01/17/2002 4:58:35 PM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
Thanks.... I understand what you meant now.
82 posted on 01/17/2002 5:12:42 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
JW really doesn't care what the documents are because it is not actually interested in discovery of information.

Is it fair to say that the Bush administration, with its vast and mighty resources, is not interested in the discovery of information either and "really doesn't care"?

83 posted on 01/17/2002 5:30:52 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
Since I have no personal knowledge of what goes on in the Bush administration, I don't feel qualified to answer your question. My personal belief, unemcumbered by any personal knowledge, is that they are concerned, but that they have a set of priorities which I might not share.
84 posted on 01/17/2002 5:51:29 PM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
hi iwo jima
I like your last post cause it expresses how I see it too
Love, Palo
85 posted on 01/17/2002 6:57:59 PM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: willa
We need an investigation done by those outside of the government, such as Judicial Watch.

Judicial Watch is not the answer. These are CRIMINAL matters and whoever does the investigation needs the full force of the government to support that investigation. That is the only way we will get to the truth. NO EXCUSES. We MUST expect more of OUR PARTY, otherwise we might as well admit that we only have a ONE PARTY system.

86 posted on 01/17/2002 7:46:20 PM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
bump
87 posted on 01/17/2002 7:51:17 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
"You dont actually believe that Bush is going to do anything about it, do you?"

Not if history reflects the future.

88 posted on 01/17/2002 7:55:12 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Am I wrong?

Yes you are, Klayman has pursued this on behalf of Sheryl Hall, his client, who was one of those threatened with all sorts of nastiness by clinton cronies if they revealed the cover up of hiding these emails. Judge Lamberth insisted on their recovery.

89 posted on 01/17/2002 7:55:54 PM PST by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
"Nothing would be done about it"

Maybe before 9/11 - but not after ...!! America has found her backbone, her resolve and her will to fight!!

90 posted on 01/17/2002 8:09:17 PM PST by Sueann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
The DOJ really doesn't care what the documents are because it is not actually interested in discovery of information. The DOJ has TONS of unopened boxes in its office.

The DOJ is doing excactly what Janet Ashcroft is supposed to have it do. Faith in the system. ha ha.

91 posted on 01/17/2002 8:18:14 PM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Thanks for the ping. This is great news! Go Larry go!
92 posted on 01/17/2002 8:39:01 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
But will the emails become public record? Didn't this article say that they haven't even been examined yet?
93 posted on 01/17/2002 8:47:13 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
"Let's see, this means that something to obsess the media will happen and the building that is housing these papers will 'have a fire destroying some documents, although it's not understood at this time what they are', will happen"

Looks like a job for the Clinton LIEbrary. I'm betting that a lot of possible "evidence" will end up in that building, to be preserved for history of course, and that a mysterious and destructive fire will unfortunately destroy all those pieces of evidence valueable documents and the Clintons, as always, will be deeply saddened by the arson loss.

94 posted on 01/17/2002 8:54:13 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Registered
No I'm not paying that much for your url!!! ain't no way...........lol


95 posted on 01/17/2002 8:54:15 PM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
Ooooo, new logo, new look. Hard to keep up with.
96 posted on 01/17/2002 9:09:42 PM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
Any incriminating e-mail will be part of renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail....

I'm going to just keep repeating this over and over and maybe, just maybe it might come true.

Thanks for the ping ChaseR.

97 posted on 01/17/2002 9:35:20 PM PST by Bullish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: KLT
Post 43: Bravo!
98 posted on 01/18/2002 7:43:55 AM PST by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
be back bumper
99 posted on 01/18/2002 7:46:44 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
The criminality of the Clinton gang has been so widespread and so deep that I believe that there will eventually be hundreds of convictions for perjury and obstruction of justice.

you're very optomistic. imo, like the original whitewater, the statutes will run before anything of consequence comes out of this.

100 posted on 01/18/2002 8:18:05 AM PST by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson