Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

How long before a Larry Klayman/Judicial Watch cruise celebrating Larry and the rest of his Enron posse?
1 posted on 01/11/2002 4:26:47 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: summer; Howlin; Miss marple; mombonn; Sabertooth
A Klayman ping.
2 posted on 01/11/2002 4:27:24 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Klayman is like Drudge. He will jump on anything he feels will draw a crowd. With Bush in office, it's time for both of them to switch sides.
4 posted on 01/11/2002 4:30:35 PM PST by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Tom Fitton, the group's president, said: "The White House has a nice little scandal on its hands with Enron and they have only themselves to blame. Their reaction certainly has shades of Bill Clinton."

The dishonesty and unscrupulousness of Judicial Watch are more reminiscent of Clinton's tactics, actually, but thanks for your concern, Tom and Larry.

5 posted on 01/11/2002 4:31:21 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Before they go shooting off their mouth, they might want to check and see the list of donations to all the politicians.. I don't know if Enron missed anyone from what I saw.
6 posted on 01/11/2002 4:32:51 PM PST by Clintons Are White Trash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
But Mr Fitton yesterday called on the White House to be more open. "Conservatives are very uncomfortable about the relations between the Bush White House and Enron and I doubt you will see many coming forward to defend the conduct, at least so far."

Really, he does not speak for me and from what I have read he sure does not sound like he speaks for many of the conservatives here. It should read "Democrats are very...." BTW where was the Barf Alert?
7 posted on 01/11/2002 4:35:11 PM PST by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Brilliant Democrat deduction by Judicial Watch: Guilt by association not by action.

You knew him, he telephoned you, you must be guilty!

What morons: had the Bush Administration bailed out Enron like Clinton and Rubin bailed out Long Term Capital Management (with taxpayer dollars) to save Rubin's partners at Goldman Sachs millions, then the Democrats and Klayman, I guess, would have howled insider-dealing and cronyism to high heavens. Since they didn't lift a finger to help Enron when Lay called in the week before bankruptcy, they are guilty because they were once in the same business, came from the same state, had talked to them on occasion in the past, and like multitudes of Democrats took campaign contributions (sorry, Enron, money wasted).

Nice trick for Democrats and Klayman scandal mongers: It's a scandal if you do help them and it's a scandal if you don't help them. You are guilty because of who you are. It's all your fault because you haven't spent your entire life sucking from the government teat like good people should.

9 posted on 01/11/2002 4:40:01 PM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78; Deport; Howlin, Miss Marple, A Citizen Reporter
Klayman and his group turned on Bush a long time ago -- the Brits are way behind. If Klayman isn't financed by the RATS, I would be surprised. I still maintain he is a front for them. He filed lawsuits, got discovery evidence and provided the clinton lawyers with his evidence, and the clintons were able to find out the evidence against them and the lawsuits always seemed to get thrown out or disappeared.

Klayman gave the impression he was after the clintons but I firmly believe nothing came out that wasn't going to come out anyways, but they used Klayman to get it out there, he made tons of money off conservatives, and did absolutely nothing to bring down the clintons. In allowing Klayman to get the information out, the vast right wing conspiracy could be blamed. Note how he does press releases now against the Bush Administration to make headlines! Something is rotten and I believe it is JW!

As they say -- that's my story and I am sticking to it until someone proves otherwise because it is the only thing that makes sense!

13 posted on 01/11/2002 4:44:36 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
"He was particularly critical of Mr Cheney's efforts to prevent the release of the minutes of meetings he and his staff held with Mr Lay and other Enron executives in the process of formulating the administration's energy policy." . . .Conservatives are uncomfortable with this Administration's relationship with Enron?.

Were all the people at JW thrown from the same horse?

Way to many quick-on-the-draw judgements from JW. . .too bad.

14 posted on 01/11/2002 4:48:03 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Blah blah blah blah.....barf barf barf...people talk, ergo coruption! Larry strikes again!!
15 posted on 01/11/2002 4:48:06 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Judicial Watch would normally support a conservative president such as Mr Bush.

Larry Klayman is to conservatives as Pee Wee Herman is to wholesome children's television.

16 posted on 01/11/2002 4:51:14 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Well, what a big surprise. You know, Larry used to be very tight with this website. He's made appearances at events, and all. Since yesterday there have been hundreds of research threads posting the connections that Democrats had with Enron, as well as Republicans. Yet, Larry didn't see them? I wonder why? And I wonder how many doners to Judical Watch, Larry has taken from this very site.
17 posted on 01/11/2002 4:51:30 PM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Larry Clymerman's turn in the barrel is coming up really soon. He will be so occupied he won't even have time to sue his invalid mother.
18 posted on 01/11/2002 4:51:44 PM PST by hgro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Apparently the Telegraph hadn't known much about Klayman's lawsuits. He's targeted Bush before this.

What can you say about a man who would sue his own mother?

20 posted on 01/11/2002 5:03:10 PM PST by 3catsanadog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Hey, maybe JW can start looking into the business practices of bogus "noprofit" corporations that raise a lot of money then spend very little of it on what they said they were going to. Some of these outfits surround themselves with lavish offices and pay themselves a lot of money.

Yep! We need nonprofit corp. reform in America to stop these people from enriching themselves or pushing their own little political agendas. And JW is perfect to lead the way since they really understand this kind of thing.

21 posted on 01/11/2002 5:05:25 PM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Actually, a liberal's take on this might be that the conservatives are trying to whitewash themselves. Larry ought to let Waxman do his thing. It'll look better if the Democrats can't find anything than if Klayman can't find anything.
22 posted on 01/11/2002 5:17:06 PM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78; Iwo Jima; nopardons; marajade; Miss Marple
Everybody that THIS surprises, please raise your hand!
25 posted on 01/11/2002 5:31:05 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple; PhiKapMom

They can't even get their spin correctly. Enron doesn't own the baseball stadium even though the did put up or agreed to a $100 million fee. The stadium is owned by the Harris County-Houston Sports Authority as far as I know and is leased to the Houston McLane Company, Inc. DBA Houston Astros Baseball Club.....

Now Brown and Root was the General Contractor and is a subsidary of Haliburton. Guess they wanted Houston to use a non local company.... sheesh.

31 posted on 01/11/2002 5:39:26 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
If the Admin is involved or knew beforehand what was going to happen and conservatives become the whore apologists like the clinton traitors, then consevatives are no better than the people we complain about.

I'll withhold judgement, but, if the Admin was involved, they MUST be held accountable. Please Mr. Bush, NO COVER-UPS on this one. Give it the light of day and get it off the liberal attack agenda.

35 posted on 01/11/2002 5:43:08 PM PST by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Did you say Larry Clymer? LOL!
56 posted on 01/11/2002 6:33:40 PM PST by sokit2mebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78
Klayman is a pig if he's attacking Bush
75 posted on 01/11/2002 7:00:13 PM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson