Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Was a Second Home for Enron Officials (huge gag alert)
The Salt Lake Tribune ^ | 1/11/2001 | Robert Reno (related to Janet?)

Posted on 01/11/2002 11:56:44 AM PST by Utah Girl

    President Bush says he has had "no contact with Enron officials in the past six weeks."
    That's a relief. It shows he has sense enough to know when a corporation has turned radioactive and is best approached at the end of a 10-foot pole. Still, this leaves almost an entire year in which Enron officials waltzed in and out of the White House enjoying an unusual degree of access. The Washington Post reports that Vice President Dick Cheney or his aides found time to meet with Enron officials on six occasions in 2001.
    On the face of it, this may not even seem excessive for an administration in which corporate interests have been given an extraordinary degree of influence. And besides, David S. Addington, the vice president's counsel, wrote a letter insisting that "Enron did not communicate information about its financial position in any of the meetings with the vice president or with the National Energy Development Group's support staff."
    That's a relief as well. Since Enron's financial troubles weren't discussed, this presumably shows Enron wasn't looking for some squalid favor that would permit it to avoid one of the most spectacular bankruptcies in history.
    It was probably just seeking to influence some government action that would advance the general interests of Enron, perhaps relief from some obnoxious regulation promulgated in the Clinton administration that stood between Enron and its ambitions to become the world's largest corporation. And in the energy-friendly Bush administration, what more logical place to come than the White House?
    Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., can be forgiven his cynicism about these Enron meetings. He said, "It shows Enron far exceeded the access provided by the White House to other parties interested in energy policy." Certainly, it exceeds the access that would be granted to, say, a bunch of high-minded old ladies in hand-knitted sweaters pleading against a rape of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Anyway, White House officials said the Enron meetings reflected nothing more sinister than the "open and inclusive" policy of the vice president's energy task force. They made it sound like all the meetings had taken place in plain sight on the White lawn.
    Anyway, the Enron meetings continued until just days before the company started to collapse. Cheney's aides met with executives of Enron's German subsidiary on Aug. 7 and with Enron officials on Oct. 10. Six days later, Enron's troubles became news, and the shell of its assets became transparent to the world.
    A little more than a month later, Enron announced $55 million in bonuses to 500 key employees. Another 4,000 employees got pink slips and $4,500 in severance pay to console them for 401(k) balances that had become close to worthless because the bulk of it was in Enron shares.
    This gave off an odor of favoritism until it was explained that somebody had to be induced to stay around and pick over the bones of Enron's carcass for what assets could be preserved. The $55 million began to look like a small price to pay for this, considering that last year the corporation had $101 billion in sales.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Just a few lies in this piece, but who's counting?
1 posted on 01/11/2002 11:56:45 AM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Janet Reno's brother is who I always go to for unbiased reporting on the Bush administration.

Uh, not.

2 posted on 01/11/2002 11:58:31 AM PST by spqrzilla9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Utah Girl
Even if the story is 100% true, what laws were broken? Is he really saying, "Enron had unprecedented access to White House officials to influence policy beneficial to the company goal of becomming the worlds largest company. As a result, they went bankrupt." I thought the objective of "buying influence" is to become successful not become a spectacular failure....great logic Robert.
4 posted on 01/11/2002 12:02:12 PM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Robert Reno IS Janet Reno's brother.
5 posted on 01/11/2002 12:03:19 PM PST by Holden Magroin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
He also has his column in Newsday, the Long Island paper.
6 posted on 01/11/2002 12:06:20 PM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl

You can email Robert Reno and tell him what you think. He is a NewsDay columnist.

7 posted on 01/11/2002 12:06:56 PM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Since when did the regime of the "Former Occupant of the Oval Office, 1993-2001" ever deny immediate and full welcome of the Enron officials to the White House? Obviously, a player as large as Enron has to have close access to the high seats of power, and the fact that Bush did contact them, when it became apparent he stood a very good chance of occupying the White House, was more an economic consideration than a political decision. Enron had seen what happens to corporations who did not play the butt-smooching game, and they did not want to be left on the outside. This strategy worked, for a while. But then the Democrats got pretty much turned out of office, and all the traps and landmines they laid began going off.
8 posted on 01/11/2002 12:07:18 PM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Blah Blah Blah. Just Democrats still mad that they failed in their attempt to steal the election.
9 posted on 01/11/2002 12:07:32 PM PST by jf55510
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
For the story behind the story...

Wednesday, Jan. 9, 2002 1:09 a.m. EST

Janet Reno Kin Outraged Over Bush-Enron Scandal

The brother of former Attorney General Janet Reno complained bitterly on Tuesday that President George Bush is escaping "deserved heat" for his ties to collapsed Texas-based energy giant Enron.

In his regular column for Newsday, Robert Reno decried what he said were "the Bush family's intimate connections to Enron [and] the company's vast contributions to Bush campaigns," saying "you need a crow bar to separate Enron's allegiance to both Bush administrations."

Protests that investigators haven't been tough enough on the White House are something new for Mr. Reno.

In contrast to his call for a tougher Enron probe, the Newsday columnist regularly defended his sister's decision not to appoint an independent counsel to probe the Clinton White House's Chinagate scandal.

But that was then, this is now.

And now - without identifying himself as the brother of a key Clinton Cabinet member or noting that his sister is running against first brother Jeb Bush for Florida governor - Robert Reno says the Bush family's ties to Enron deserve far more scrutiny.

"It's as if Bush has been inoculated with an immunity no known virus can invade," he fumed.

"Only in the Bush-can-do-no-wrong atmosphere of current Washington does such a scandal resist the sort of smelly exposure and inquiry that accompanied every misjudgment of the eight years of Bill Clinton."

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
Bush Administration
Clinton Scandals

10 posted on 01/11/2002 12:07:53 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I think we should freep them with a lot of dem connections to Enron.
11 posted on 01/11/2002 12:08:10 PM PST by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Where the hell was all this outrage in the press when Clinton was selling nuclear secrets to the Chicoms? Sheesssshhhh!
12 posted on 01/11/2002 12:09:27 PM PST by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
White House Coffee Guest List, March 5, 1996
13 posted on 01/11/2002 12:09:33 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Enron_List, click below:
  click here >>> Enron_List <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)

Note there's a link for the whole bump list- consider directing lurkers & newcomers there to show them just how vast an amount of research & opinion is here on-site.

14 posted on 01/11/2002 12:13:14 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
If my sister had been Bubba Hump's attorney general and let him get away with as many unsavory things as Janet did, I don't think I'd say boo about Enron. I'd be ashamed to.
15 posted on 01/11/2002 12:13:29 PM PST by RichInOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Every word Robert Reno is a frustrated, spittle-covered lie, including 'and' and 'the'.
16 posted on 01/11/2002 12:17:38 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thanks. I've found a few more Enron articles, and I'll try to remember to ping the Enron_list.
17 posted on 01/11/2002 12:17:51 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The real story that interests people here is that top officials, who always had huge salaries, walk away with giant bonuses while the little guys lose their jobs and their life savings.

The fact that Enron officials met with Cheney and other White House officials isn't a scandal...they didn't save the company when it was on its way out. The only problem I can see is that until recently GWB has advocated that workers should be allowed to put a portion of Social Security money in the stock market to assure a financially secure retirement...that is not a plan when the big guys walk away with millions.

It isn't a Republican or Democratic issue...it's more of a populist issue that the powers that be just don't play by the rules anymore.

18 posted on 01/11/2002 12:19:37 PM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Personally, I don't care if Enron executives and "administration official" are blood relatives. Show me the quid pro quo!
19 posted on 01/11/2002 12:33:46 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Wonderful! We can use that bump list as proof positive that FR is much more than a conservative opinion site; it's a valuable tool for serious research and de-spinning.
20 posted on 01/11/2002 12:38:30 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson