Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Call for Flag Amendment Unanimous Among the States
US Newswire ^ | 01.11.01 | US Newswire

Posted on 01/11/2002 7:51:13 AM PST by callisto

To: National Desk
Contact: Mary Kay Rutledge of the Citizens Flag Alliance,
317-630-1384; Web site: http://www.cfa-inc.org/

INDIANAPOLIS, Jan. 11 /U.S. Newswire/ -- After years of political hardball, a determined group of Vermont legislators stepped to the plate Thursday and hit a home run for flag protection.

JRS 9, a joint resolution calling for an amendment to the United States Constitution that would allow Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag, passed both chambers of the Vermont state legislature. The measure urges Congress to explore "all avenues available, which may include a constitutional amendment" to protect the U.S. flag from physical desecration.

With this action Vermont becomes the 50th state to formally call on Congress, by resolution, to propose a flag amendment and send it to the states for ratification.

"We deeply admire the courage of Vermonters for having labored over a decade to finally win this day," said Major General Patrick H. Brady, chairman of the Board of the Citizens Flag Alliance, a coalition of more than 140 organizations that have championed flag protection since 1994. "Their success is attributable to their persistence in doing what is right, the same persistence that will move the flag amendment off Capitol Hill and back to state legislatures where, once and for all, the people will have the final say on legal protection for their flag."

Brady said that he hoped Congress hears the voice of the people in Vermont and across the Nation. "With the level of patriotism what it is today, it is inconceivable to me that the Senate will continue to thwart the will of the people. There are few issues today that enjoy the degree of support of the flag amendment. There is no other issue on Capitol Hill that has the endorsement of 80 percent of the American people, an overwhelming majority in both the U.S. House and Senate, and 100 percent of the state legislatures."

The issue has traveled the nation. It has been debated in every chamber of every state's legislature, every one of which has moved favorably in their call for the amendment, noted Brady. "Every state's legislature has taken the matter through a similar winding process of introductions, cosponsorship, hearings, debates, and votes. And everyone has come to the same conclusion: The people of the United States deserve the right to decide if they want to protect Old Glory."

With passage of the flag protection amendment (HJ Res. 36) in the House of Representatives last July, Brady offered, "it's time for the Senate to listen to the people and approve the proposed flag amendment. Then, let's hear from the people across America as the amendment is debated in ratification."

------ Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady (USA-Ret.) is the chairman of the Indianapolis-based Citizens Flag Alliance (CFA). The CFA is a broad-based national coalition of 142 organizations committed to seeking passage of a constitutional amendment which would return to the American people the right to protect their flag. Brady was awarded the Medal of Honor for his service in the Vietnam War during which time he rescued over 5,000 casualties of war.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 01/11/2002 7:51:13 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: callisto
Woohoo! First step in silencing dissent!
2 posted on 01/11/2002 7:56:16 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
They'll wipe their ass with the Constitution, while trying to convince us that they are "patriotic".
3 posted on 01/11/2002 7:56:38 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
They'll wipe their ass with the Constitution, while trying to convince us that they are "patriotic".

Would wrapping themselves in the flag for political gain constitute "desecration"?
4 posted on 01/11/2002 7:57:45 AM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: callisto
How about a "restoration and protection of the Constitution" act?
5 posted on 01/11/2002 7:57:54 AM PST by thesharkboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
A resolution asking Congress to propose an amendment is worthless. Had the states wanted to do something about this (bogus) issue, they could have passed a resolution demanding "A Convention for Proposing Amendments...as Part of This Constitution". That would have been a horse of a different color.
6 posted on 01/11/2002 7:59:56 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: callisto
I'm sure that the BATF will be put in charge of the 5am no-knocks to round up all the flag desecrators!!
8 posted on 01/11/2002 8:05:10 AM PST by TexRef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
"Would wrapping themselves in the flag for political gain constitute "desecration"?...........well said.
9 posted on 01/11/2002 8:05:35 AM PST by Rustynailww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Publius
Is there an approach they could take with this unanimous resolution that could equate, or translate, with the call for a convention to amend the constitution?
10 posted on 01/11/2002 8:09:51 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Brady was awarded the Medal of Honor for his service in the Vietnam War during which time he rescued over 5,000 casualties of war.

It's really sad that someone like that should turn around and try to shit on the very freedoms he was supposedly trying to protect.

11 posted on 01/11/2002 8:11:25 AM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Absolutely not. The wording must be in the form of an application to Congress for a Convention for Proposing Amendments under Article V, otherwise it is not valid for that purpose. These "advisory" resolutions from the states are a way for politicians to go on the record in favor of patriotism without doing anything substantive.
12 posted on 01/11/2002 8:13:24 AM PST by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
"Here they go, expecting us to waste vast amounts of political capital on a quixotic crusade to crush the relatively rare dissent. If one passed, I'd never fly one again like I do now, and I'd be tempted to burn a flag out of spite for the new law."

I personally would never, ever be tempted to burn the American flag, there is no greater disrespect to this nation and the people who fought and died for the freedoms you enjoy now, then to Desecrate the Flag, by any means. While I am sure it means very little to you, you (sir/Madam) just lost any respect I could ever feel for you.

God Bless America

13 posted on 01/11/2002 8:16:31 AM PST by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thesharkboy
How about a "restoration and protection of the Constitution" act?

Seconded!

14 posted on 01/11/2002 8:18:22 AM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: callisto
This is wrong all over the place.
15 posted on 01/11/2002 8:19:02 AM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener
Yeah, the flag is a symbol of our country, not our god...sticks and stones can break our bones, but burnin' ol' glory won't stop us! - an' kain't hurt us, neither!
16 posted on 01/11/2002 8:22:53 AM PST by kickme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: callisto
Great. Get ready for the "War on Flag desecration". I can see it now, officers from the "Department of Homeland Defense" snooping around burned out bonfires, trashcans, and bar-b-cues, just to make sure they find no remnents of a burnt flag. Lets not forget 4am no-knock raids to make sure you didn't try to hide the evidence inside.
18 posted on 01/11/2002 8:25:15 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson