Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001
January 9, 2002White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal ImmigrantsBy ROBERT PEARASHINGTON, Jan. 9 The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law. The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years. The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs. The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here. But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting. As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president. Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive. "This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office." As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters. Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way." Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim. James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this." The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996." Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice. "This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family." |
Bush's political advisors are not fools. They know that Latinos are not naturally leftist or liberal as a group. The only reason they vote Democrat is that the Dems have targeted them with pro-Latino propaganda and legislation. So the Republicans can play this game, too. Perhaps Bush will only get a few votes this way, but remember how close the last election was. Every vote he can grab from the Democrats is vitally important to his re-election.
I see. So you win by emulating your opponents odious practices? So why doesn't Bush just become a Democrat and "get a few" more votes?? This is precisely what is wrong with the Republican Party. It's about power and not about principle.
Every time some poor fool like me raises this question, we are immediately "shhhhed!" into silence by our betters, who patiently explain to us that this is all strategery that is beyond our ken to comprehend. I mean Karl Rove is REALLY smart! "I know, I know!" they assure us, "I know he looks like he's caving but he's really doing the opposite! Isn't it brilliant? He's beating them at their own game!" (furious head scratching on our part ensues). Uhhh...Ok...if you say so.
It's debatable if they are smart enough to reach the lofty level of being stupid.LOL
WarHawk42
Yes, it's like the main duties of the FBI and other law enforcement is to baby-sit the nefarious aliens here some of which are true terrorists that wish to do America more harm while we insanely let more of them in. Bin Laden is right about one thing...he and his murderous kind can afford to bide their time and hit us again as soon as we let our guard down. That PIG knows our government is PC and thus has ZERO backbone in controlling immigration. GW seems to prove OBL right. Well, if another terrorist attack occurs, the blood will be on GW's hands.
Yeah, well, you don't have to worry about that anymore.
We don't want to be, but we are just that. And Bush is looking to increase the freebies.
The only one at fault is bush. His record in Texas and his speeches on the election trail laid out his plans for Mexico. He was all for open borders and told us so before he was ever elected.
No surprise.
WarHawk42
Yes he is right about that. He may not be around to see it, but he is right. The only question is how many attacks will it take before we get serious about protecting this nation.
WarHawk42
How true and well said! I've been thinking that this country needs another party that isn't wedded to the big money in DC, which in reality neutralizes the differences between the parties where it counts. On the matters of immigration, trade and even taxes and spending to some extent, there is virtually no difference in the parties. I'd be a lot more patient with the Republican party if I saw a steady shift back to its roots but alas what is happening is that the democratic party continues to drag the republicans to the left. What conservative that believes in the U.S. constitution needs this? I don't particularly like the Reform Party either but sooner or later a true new party, a Conservative Party, is going to emerge that will drive a wedge between the two major parties on a whole host of issues that go underrepresented in Washington. It is not a matter of if but when.
I understand what you're saying, but I am fed up with this invasion and the administration that is only encouraging it. Why should I help reward their betrayal with my vote? I won't be voting for Bush again at the rate he's going, I'll vote for an independent.
Food stamps are issued by the Dept. of Agriculture. Food stamps are a farm subsidy, nothing more nothing less, always have been.
This Texan believes Bush was much more like Gray Davis in this area, and as for Pete Wilson, I wish we had him as president instead of Bush. I understand that he made an effort to curb immigration and the freebies for them, the polar opposite of Bush imo.
Yes, it will.
As long as they can take your vote for granted why should they change? They count on that, they set the system up to be that way. Your vote is the only weapon you have short of a gun. They demonize the other party to keep you voting for them.
I didn't vote for either of the lame stream party's the last time. Neither earned my vote. It doesn't look like bush will the next time either and I'm sure the democrats won't. That only leaves a third party or staying home. I will cast my vote for the best candidate running. I won't stay home.
WarHawk42
That is exactly what is at the core of this insanity of doling out welfare to immigrants. It just encourages more of them to illegally enter this country to feed at the public trough. A true New American Experience but too bad if you are a taxpayer. The stupidity of this is staggering. Its like we dont learn from past mistakes or what happened on 9/11. I didn't vote for Bush to be president of Mexico and the greater 3rd World.
We might disagree on what is good for America, but at least we'd agree that this nation is on the side of good.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.