Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants
New York Times ^

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001



January 9, 2002

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.

The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years.

The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs.

The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here.

But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems — a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting.

As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance — specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president.

Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive.

"This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office."

As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters.

Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way."

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim.

James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this."

The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996."

Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice.

"This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-265 next last
To: codeword
Bush's political advisors are not fools. They know that Latinos are not naturally leftist or liberal as a group. The only reason they vote Democrat is that the Dems have targeted them with pro-Latino propaganda and legislation. So the Republicans can play this game, too. Perhaps Bush will only get a few votes this way, but remember how close the last election was. Every vote he can grab from the Democrats is vitally important to his re-election.

I see. So you win by emulating your opponents odious practices? So why doesn't Bush just become a Democrat and "get a few" more votes?? This is precisely what is wrong with the Republican Party. It's about power and not about principle.

Every time some poor fool like me raises this question, we are immediately "shhhhed!" into silence by our betters, who patiently explain to us that this is all strategery that is beyond our ken to comprehend. I mean Karl Rove is REALLY smart! "I know, I know!" they assure us, "I know he looks like he's caving but he's really doing the opposite! Isn't it brilliant? He's beating them at their own game!" (furious head scratching on our part ensues). Uhhh...Ok...if you say so.

121 posted on 01/09/2002 9:43:49 PM PST by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
TOLERANCE IS LAME!! Isn't it?? UGH!! George, George, George...UGH!
122 posted on 01/09/2002 9:46:13 PM PST by MoJo2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
No habla englais.
123 posted on 01/09/2002 9:49:49 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
We don't call them The Stupid Party for nothing.

It's debatable if they are smart enough to reach the lofty level of being stupid.LOL

WarHawk42

124 posted on 01/09/2002 9:50:35 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: WarHawk42
The first priority should have been the safety of this country from within. Afghanistan wasn't going anywhere. The borders and weeding out the bad seeds already here should have been the most important item on the agenda. Unfortunately it still isn't.

Yes, it's like the main duties of the FBI and other law enforcement is to baby-sit the nefarious aliens here some of which are true terrorists that wish to do America more harm while we insanely let more of them in. Bin Laden is right about one thing...he and his murderous kind can afford to bide their time and hit us again as soon as we let our guard down. That PIG knows our government is PC and thus has ZERO backbone in controlling immigration. GW seems to prove OBL right. Well, if another terrorist attack occurs, the blood will be on GW's hands.

125 posted on 01/09/2002 9:50:50 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
No habla englais.

Yeah, well, you don't have to worry about that anymore.

126 posted on 01/09/2002 9:52:22 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Grover Norquist and Spencer Abraham have designed the open borders policy. But it's Dubya's fault for heeding their bad advice.
127 posted on 01/09/2002 9:52:32 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: glc1173@aol.com
We don't want to be the welfare office for every poor Third World nation dumping its poorest on us.

We don't want to be, but we are just that. And Bush is looking to increase the freebies.

128 posted on 01/09/2002 9:56:03 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
I've done that the last two elections.
129 posted on 01/09/2002 9:56:50 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
But it's Dubya's fault for heeding their bad advice.

The only one at fault is bush.  His record in Texas and his speeches on the election trail laid out his plans for Mexico.  He was all for open borders and told us so before he was ever elected.

No surprise.

WarHawk42

130 posted on 01/09/2002 10:06:52 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Bin Laden is right about one thing...he and his murderous kind can afford to bide their time and hit us again as soon as we let our guard down. That PIG knows our government is PC and thus has ZERO backbone in controlling immigration.

Yes he is right about that.  He may not be around to see it, but he is right.  The only question is how many attacks will it take before we get serious about protecting this nation.

WarHawk42

131 posted on 01/09/2002 10:10:29 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
I see. So you win by emulating your opponents odious practices? So why doesn't Bush just become a Democrat and "get a few" more votes?? This is precisely what is wrong with the Republican Party. It's about power and not about principle.

How true and well said! I've been thinking that this country needs another party that isn't wedded to the big money in DC, which in reality neutralizes the differences between the parties where it counts. On the matters of immigration, trade and even taxes and spending to some extent, there is virtually no difference in the parties. I'd be a lot more patient with the Republican party if I saw a steady shift back to its roots but alas what is happening is that the democratic party continues to drag the republicans to the left. What conservative that believes in the U.S. constitution needs this? I don't particularly like the Reform Party either but sooner or later a true new party, a Conservative Party, is going to emerge that will drive a wedge between the two major parties on a whole host of issues that go underrepresented in Washington. It is not a matter of if but when.

132 posted on 01/09/2002 10:11:59 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Opting out (that is, staying home or voting for a single-digit type) is not the answer. But it seems some here are planning to do just that. And, of course, if they aren't going to be in the ballgame, they are hardly in a position to complain about the calls.

I understand what you're saying, but I am fed up with this invasion and the administration that is only encouraging it. Why should I help reward their betrayal with my vote? I won't be voting for Bush again at the rate he's going, I'll vote for an independent.

133 posted on 01/09/2002 10:19:33 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
That way we're sure the money is going for food and the farmers benefit too.

Food stamps are issued by the Dept. of Agriculture. Food stamps are a farm subsidy, nothing more nothing less, always have been.

134 posted on 01/09/2002 10:27:42 PM PST by lewislynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Celtjew Libertarian
It strikes me that President Bush's policy with regard to Hispanics has not been that different from his policy when he was governor of Texas. He came out against many of the ballot measures that Pete Wilson pushed in California.

This Texan believes Bush was much more like Gray Davis in this area, and as for Pete Wilson, I wish we had him as president instead of Bush. I understand that he made an effort to curb immigration and the freebies for them, the polar opposite of Bush imo.

135 posted on 01/09/2002 10:31:41 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
Well, if another terrorist attack occurs, the blood will be on GW's hands.

Yes, it will.

136 posted on 01/09/2002 10:37:19 PM PST by dougherty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: dougherty
Why should I help reward their betrayal with my vote? I won't be voting for Bush again at the rate he's going, I'll vote for an independent.

As long as they can take your vote for granted why should they change?  They count on that, they set the system up to be that way.  Your vote is the only weapon you have short of a gun.  They demonize the other party to keep you voting for them.

I didn't vote for either of the lame stream party's the last time.  Neither earned my vote.  It doesn't look like bush will the next time either and I'm sure the democrats won't.  That only leaves a third party or staying home.  I will cast my vote for the best candidate running.  I won't stay home.

WarHawk42

137 posted on 01/09/2002 10:37:34 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
All those people who think immigrants are going to save the Social Security program need to read this, that what really will happen is the taxpayers will be supporting them instead. There should be no welfare or food stamps, the minute you do that they tell all their relatives and friends back home and then they come looking for the same.

That is exactly what is at the core of this insanity of doling out welfare to immigrants. It just encourages more of them to illegally enter this country to feed at the public trough. A true New American Experience but too bad if you are a taxpayer. The stupidity of this is staggering. It’s like we don’t learn from past mistakes or what happened on 9/11. I didn't vote for Bush to be president of Mexico and the greater 3rd World.

138 posted on 01/09/2002 10:46:20 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
It wouldn't surprise me if the GOP moves to a center/small-l-libertarian position and a new conservative party rises. Even though I'd probably remain with the GOP, I'd still celebrate this shift, because we'd end up with the remaining Democrats, an approx. 10% fringe rump of the real America-haters, socialists, and Greens, out of power, except maybe for a few inner city and college-town Congresscritters.

We might disagree on what is good for America, but at least we'd agree that this nation is on the side of good.

139 posted on 01/09/2002 11:02:28 PM PST by Celtjew Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: WarHawk42
Now the Democrats will just up the ante - restoration of cash welfare payments, Medicaid and SSI.
140 posted on 01/09/2002 11:51:28 PM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson