Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants
New York Times ^

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001



January 9, 2002

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.

The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years.

The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs.

The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here.

But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems — a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting.

As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance — specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president.

Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive.

"This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office."

As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters.

Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way."

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim.

James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this."

The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996."

Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice.

"This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-265 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: SentryoverAmerica
Now who dares to call President Bush a "conservative"? Anyone? Anyone?

All I want to know is where do the rights of AMERICAN CITIZENS BEGIN? And a big NO on your question. Looks like GW is selling out the conservative base for the hope that a good percentage of Hispanics will vote for him...as if. If GW doesn't shut down the ongoing invasion from Mexico he won't get my vote next time around. It's that simple.

42 posted on 01/09/2002 7:10:53 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WarHawk42
Bush is riding high on his war popularity right now but it isn't going to last into the next election. America's attention span isn't that long and if the economy doesn't improve dramatically he will lose the next election.

You'd think that GW would have learned from his dad's mistakes.

43 posted on 01/09/2002 7:13:40 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: WRhine
All I want to know is where do the rights of AMERICAN CITIZENS BEGIN?

I thought they pretty much eliminated what was left of our rights when they passed the 'Patriot" bill.

Aren't you considered a terrorist by the FBI?  I am.

WarHawk42

45 posted on 01/09/2002 7:16:48 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: WarHawk42
I repeat. It ain't gonna happen that he gets 50% of the Latino vote nation wide. The republican party is self destructing and they don't have the sense to know it. They have deserted there base trying to win democrat votes which they will never do in numbers large enough to do them any good.

Well put. That is exactly what they are doing. They don't call the Republican Party the Stupid Party for nothing. You can't out pander the socialists. They will beat you every time and drag you left in the process.

47 posted on 01/09/2002 7:18:24 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
Street language "socialism" by conservatives often refers to the growing waste and the lack of efficient and well run government departments. It refers to excessive tax rates and excessive wealth transfer.

Yes, you're right: this is the "street use" of the word in conservative circles nowadays.

I think this is unfortunate, since it obscures an important distinction between the phenomena you are describing--which people used to call "creeping socialism" or "welfare-state capitalism"--and outright socialism in the sense of "public ownership of the means of production," which is a hugely different economic system from the one we have.

I just think it clouds our thinking not to acknowledge this difference.

48 posted on 01/09/2002 7:20:03 PM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
You'd think that GW would have learned from his dad's mistakes.

Republican politicians seen to have a learning deficiency.:)

WarHawk42

49 posted on 01/09/2002 7:20:10 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sailor4321
"If they're here legally what's the problem?"

Simple. If they're here legally, where are their sponsors - the people who got these aliens here by signing a pledge to keep them from becoming "public charges?"

Simple. We don't want to be the welfare office for every poor Third World nation dumping its poorest on us. Look at all the Russian retirees who came after Russia's pension system collapsed.

IMMIGRATION resource library: public-health facts, court decisions, local INS numbers!

50 posted on 01/09/2002 7:20:36 PM PST by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
Don't know if you saw the latest buzz about Buchannon but, like him or hate him, the data and figures he used came from statisticians, think tanks, etc. and the facts are dead on and frightful.

Yes, I have been all over the threads concerning Pat Buchannon's book the "Death of the West". Pat speaks the unholy truth that uncontrolled 3rd world immigration is destroying Western Civilization. His book seems to be getting very good reviews. Hard to argue with the facts in his book as much of it comes from the UN of all places. I plan on buying it soon.

51 posted on 01/09/2002 7:25:34 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bob R; RonDog; *Hugh Hewitt; CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; susangirl...
The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.

I've got my 2002 ballot in one hand, and a lighter in the other. If the Republicans think they can win by outbidding the Democrats for the Latino vote, they can do it without me in their party.

I oppose food stamps for citizens, let alone immigrants. The 1996 Welfare Reform Act was one of the great success stories of the last 30 years. I did not vote for Dubya for this kind of feel-good, big gov betrayal, and I won't vote for him or any Republican during his term if this proposal happens.

And I have a big mouth.

Hugh Hewitt, are you listening?


52 posted on 01/09/2002 7:27:25 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
Don't know if you saw the latest buzz about Buchannon but, like him or hate him, the data and figures he used came from statisticians, think tanks, etc. and the facts are dead on and frightful.

Buchanan is right.  It just isn't PC to think that way.  The demonization of him will have to go ahead at warp speed.:)

WarHawk42

53 posted on 01/09/2002 7:28:05 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: codeword
GWB can speak Spanish and hand out my money all he wants, but when it comes time to pull the lever, the minorities will be reminded by the DNC that it's all just "windowdressing", and they will continue to vote for the Dems.
54 posted on 01/09/2002 7:28:56 PM PST by kwyjibo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: codeword
Not everyone on this site misuses the word "socialism" in a way that would include the policies of George W. Bush.

In a confused, reality impaired way you are correct. A more appropriate description of the policy decisions of the Bush Adminsitration would be social-statist.

---max

55 posted on 01/09/2002 7:29:39 PM PST by max61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Each day some worse news comes out of Washington. I feel like we are losing it.

Just about ready to just give up!!

56 posted on 01/09/2002 7:29:40 PM PST by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: codeword
I agree with you. My confidence has eroded considerably about Bush's domestic policy with Hispanics since he took office. On the other hand, I realize that he has to make concessions in this area to muster votes for the next election. I try to console myself with the notion that this is something he has to do to get back in, and that it sure beats the alternative...
57 posted on 01/09/2002 7:30:19 PM PST by ZDaphne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kwyjibo
... but when it comes time to pull the lever, the minorities will be reminded by the DNC that it's all just "windowdressing", and they will continue to vote for the Dems.

Maybe. But I think President Bush has a whole crowd of pollsters and analysts and advisors that are telling him otherwise, and he is listening.

58 posted on 01/09/2002 7:31:05 PM PST by codeword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ZDaphne
Why can't the alternative be Alan Keyes?
59 posted on 01/09/2002 7:32:03 PM PST by kwyjibo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: WarHawk42
Aren't you considered a terrorist by the FBI? I am.

I probably was during the Clinton administration for having the unmitigated gall to call Clinton and his band of communist thugs for what they were/are....criminals and traitors. I certainly hope that I'm not with GW.

60 posted on 01/09/2002 7:32:20 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson