Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001
January 9, 2002White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal ImmigrantsBy ROBERT PEARASHINGTON, Jan. 9 The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law. The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years. The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs. The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here. But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting. As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president. Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive. "This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office." As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters. Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way." Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim. James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this." The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996." Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice. "This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family." |
All I want to know is where do the rights of AMERICAN CITIZENS BEGIN? And a big NO on your question. Looks like GW is selling out the conservative base for the hope that a good percentage of Hispanics will vote for him...as if. If GW doesn't shut down the ongoing invasion from Mexico he won't get my vote next time around. It's that simple.
You'd think that GW would have learned from his dad's mistakes.
I thought they pretty much eliminated what was left of our rights when they passed the 'Patriot" bill.
Aren't you considered a terrorist by the FBI? I am.
WarHawk42
Well put. That is exactly what they are doing. They don't call the Republican Party the Stupid Party for nothing. You can't out pander the socialists. They will beat you every time and drag you left in the process.
Yes, you're right: this is the "street use" of the word in conservative circles nowadays.
I think this is unfortunate, since it obscures an important distinction between the phenomena you are describing--which people used to call "creeping socialism" or "welfare-state capitalism"--and outright socialism in the sense of "public ownership of the means of production," which is a hugely different economic system from the one we have.
I just think it clouds our thinking not to acknowledge this difference.
Republican politicians seen to have a learning deficiency.:)
WarHawk42
Simple. If they're here legally, where are their sponsors - the people who got these aliens here by signing a pledge to keep them from becoming "public charges?"
Simple. We don't want to be the welfare office for every poor Third World nation dumping its poorest on us. Look at all the Russian retirees who came after Russia's pension system collapsed.
IMMIGRATION resource library: public-health facts, court decisions, local INS numbers!
Yes, I have been all over the threads concerning Pat Buchannon's book the "Death of the West". Pat speaks the unholy truth that uncontrolled 3rd world immigration is destroying Western Civilization. His book seems to be getting very good reviews. Hard to argue with the facts in his book as much of it comes from the UN of all places. I plan on buying it soon.
I've got my 2002 ballot in one hand, and a lighter in the other. If the Republicans think they can win by outbidding the Democrats for the Latino vote, they can do it without me in their party.
I oppose food stamps for citizens, let alone immigrants. The 1996 Welfare Reform Act was one of the great success stories of the last 30 years. I did not vote for Dubya for this kind of feel-good, big gov betrayal, and I won't vote for him or any Republican during his term if this proposal happens.
And I have a big mouth.
Hugh Hewitt, are you listening?
Buchanan is right. It just isn't PC to think that way. The demonization of him will have to go ahead at warp speed.:)
WarHawk42
In a confused, reality impaired way you are correct. A more appropriate description of the policy decisions of the Bush Adminsitration would be social-statist.
---max
Just about ready to just give up!!
Maybe. But I think President Bush has a whole crowd of pollsters and analysts and advisors that are telling him otherwise, and he is listening.
I probably was during the Clinton administration for having the unmitigated gall to call Clinton and his band of communist thugs for what they were/are....criminals and traitors. I certainly hope that I'm not with GW.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.