Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's Role in WTC Attack on America is Revealed
PR Newswire, via drudge ^ | 1/8/02 | Gordon Thomas

Posted on 01/08/2002 8:10:03 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat

China's Role in WTC Attack on America is Revealed By Veteran Foreign Correspondent Gordon Thomas

TEMPE, Ariz., Jan. 8 /PRNewswire/ -- China will use the current global crisis to launch itself as a new Super-Power and become America's new major enemy, according to Gordon Thomas, an internationally recognized expert on intelligence matters.

On September 11, 2001, the same day the World Trade Center and Pentagon were hit by terrorists, a Chinese Peoples Liberation Army transport aircraft from Beijing landed in Kabul with the most important delegation the ruling Taliban had ever received, says Thomas. He describes the ongoing threat from China in his new book, "Seeds of Fire: China and the Story Behind the Attack on America" ($25.95, Dandelion Books) available in bookstores, or at http://www.dandelionbooks.com .

"Hours later, CIA Director George Tenet received a coded 'red alert' message from Mossad's Tel Aviv headquarters that presented what he called a 'worst case scenario' -- that China would use a ruthless surrogate, bin-Laden, to attack the United States," says Thomas, who has over thirty years of experience as a foreign affairs reporter and investigative journalist.

The Chinese delegation had come to sign the contract with Afghanistan that Osama bin-Laden had asked for, that would provide the Taliban with missile-tracking, state of the art communications, and air defense systems in exchange for the Taliban's promise to end the attacks by Muslim extremists in China's north-western regions.

"China by 2015 will have deployed tens to several tens of missiles with nuclear warheads targeted against the US," predicts a CIA briefing paper to the Bush Administration, according to Thomas. "Seeds of Fire" devotes over 100 pages of never before published official documents pertaining to China's global take-over strategies.

Thomas also exposes the secret dealings between Russia and China. He reveals reasons for the ever-closer relationship developing between Israel's Mossad and China's Secret Intelligence Service that enabled America's ultra-secret plans to be stolen from Los Alamos.

Thomas is known most recently for his international best-seller, "Gideon's Spies." He has written over 38 best-selling books that have sold over 45 million copies in 36 countries. Dandelion Books has already sold "Seeds of Fire" foreign rights to 30 countries with 2 more pending. Anvil Studios has just acquired the film rights for the book.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Diddle E. Squat
..and our fools in D.C. give them "most favored nation status."
21 posted on 01/08/2002 9:44:44 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
"I have to state I'm NOT pro-PRC, and nor do I believe the PRC is no threat to the US...it is. But there is just an amazing amount of BS out there overhyping China's military, claiming hundreds of thousands of PRC troops are all over the world, and the new hobby horse is linking China to Al Qaeda directly."

You are probably right - to fight effectively for a cause one must, for the most part, believe in the system demanding sacrifice. From what I see and hear, the CCP (of which the PLA is only their lap-dog) has enough trouble standing on its own merit among its supporters without the added detriment of a conflict with the U.S. which would serve only to quickly alienate the pro-democratic constituency (BTW, pro-democratic is not to be mistaken as pro-western). Besides, the Chinese aren't totally ingorant of the power of the U.S. - they probably know as well as any American citizen. The Chinese arsenal of NW's compared to America's would be much similar to the man going to a gunfight armed only with a pocket knife. Their possession of warheads as a world nuclear power seems to be primarily as an antidotal sense of security and parity. They can't use them offensively in any capacity without a U.S. and/or world reprisal leading to the total destruction of their country.

22 posted on 01/08/2002 9:54:17 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chemainus
If China were out to conquer the U.S., the last thing they would do is kick us in the shins to piss us off and put us on alert. China thinks long-term, and therefore would more likely bide their time quietly while their military capabilities get up to speed. Right now, they suck.

The real fallacy, I think, is the premise that the Chinese want to take over the U.S. at all. They (their leadership) are not idealogues. They want power and money, yes, but they don't buy Marxism any more than I do. A Chinese attack on the U.S. is unlikely, unless instigated by a lunatic military fringe. Now Taiwan......

23 posted on 01/08/2002 9:59:43 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
"....while their military capabilities get up to speed."

The best of the majority of the Chinese military weaponry fielded to date is probably not as good as those U.S. third generation weapons we've already deemed obsolete and have long ago discarded. This case was proven in Iraq and Bosnia. The only new W.S. the Chinese have worth mentioning besides the new-yet-to-be-deployed Dong-Fang 41 ICBM is the Russian-built Shkval V-11 torpedo-missile, and as far as we now know, the Chinese have yet to take possession of any subs having the capacity to launch these fish while submerged. Personally speaking, I'm glad America doesn't depend upon mobile missile launchers as our means of nuclear deterrence because having these things hot and mobile near populated areas is asking for disaster - either from accident (unintentional fuel detonation from wear/exposure or mishandling) or by attack (from agressors).

24 posted on 01/08/2002 10:24:15 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
I agree. Interestingly, the one military asset that China has an abundance of is personnel, but they can't move them anywhere. Without a blue water navy, world domination becomes difficult.
25 posted on 01/08/2002 10:30:18 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Air Dominance. Air Dominance.
Airman Wang vs. Airman Olsen testifies to this, my friend....
26 posted on 01/08/2002 11:09:57 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat; Prodigal Daughter
Parts of this story have appeared on FreeRepublic at other times in different links.

Perhaps the Chinese remember Clinton accidently bombing their embassy.  Just perhaps...

27 posted on 01/08/2002 11:36:27 AM PST by 2sheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Hmmm. I think it was an older story. Seems like it came out a week or two after 911. China had stolen a LOT of this VERY high-tech equipment from british labs and was using it to bribe OBL and Al'Queda to not attack them. Don't remember the source tho.
28 posted on 01/08/2002 12:58:56 PM PST by America's Resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Diddle E. Squat; golitely; chemainus; America's Resolve
That similar article was posted here last month...

Book says China involved in 9-11 attacks -- Beijing used bin Laden to assault U.S., claims author

29 posted on 01/08/2002 1:43:50 PM PST by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Mr. Bird #23 Disagree completely...take a look at how many civilizations, with whom the Chinese have come in contact, have disappeared. Count them. How many hundreds did you get? Your opinion is understandable but it is based on Western thinking and surprisingly the Chinese and Muslims share one thing...Eastern thought.
30 posted on 01/08/2002 7:11:43 PM PST by chemainus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: spycatcher
That similar article was posted here last month...

Ah knew, ah say, ah knew that looked familiah!

31 posted on 01/08/2002 8:39:04 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson