Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Bird
"....while their military capabilities get up to speed."

The best of the majority of the Chinese military weaponry fielded to date is probably not as good as those U.S. third generation weapons we've already deemed obsolete and have long ago discarded. This case was proven in Iraq and Bosnia. The only new W.S. the Chinese have worth mentioning besides the new-yet-to-be-deployed Dong-Fang 41 ICBM is the Russian-built Shkval V-11 torpedo-missile, and as far as we now know, the Chinese have yet to take possession of any subs having the capacity to launch these fish while submerged. Personally speaking, I'm glad America doesn't depend upon mobile missile launchers as our means of nuclear deterrence because having these things hot and mobile near populated areas is asking for disaster - either from accident (unintentional fuel detonation from wear/exposure or mishandling) or by attack (from agressors).

24 posted on 01/08/2002 10:24:15 AM PST by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: azhenfud
I agree. Interestingly, the one military asset that China has an abundance of is personnel, but they can't move them anywhere. Without a blue water navy, world domination becomes difficult.
25 posted on 01/08/2002 10:30:18 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson